Suppr超能文献

脐动脉和子宫动脉连续波与脉冲多普勒S/D比值的比较。

Comparison of continuous-wave and pulsed Doppler S/D ratios of umbilical and uterine arteries.

作者信息

Mehalek K E, Berkowitz G S, Chitkara U, Rosenberg J, Berkowitz R L

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Oct;72(4):603-6.

PMID:3047610
Abstract

Continuous-wave and pulsed Doppler ultrasound measurements of blood flow velocity waveforms of both uterine and umbilical arteries were performed on 85 patients to assess the correlation between these two measurements techniques. Peak systolic to end-diastolic (S/D) ratios measured by continuous-wave devices were not statistically different (P greater than .05) from those measured by a pulsed Doppler device. The S/D ratios of the umbilical artery measured by each device showed a strong correlation, whether measured by one observer (r = 0.93) or two observers (r = 0.89). Uterine artery ratios showed a weaker, although still significant, correlation (r = 0.57). Pulsed Doppler is not routinely necessary for the identification and measurement of umbilical and uterine artery S/D ratios.

摘要

对85例患者进行了子宫动脉和脐动脉血流速度波形的连续波和脉冲多普勒超声测量,以评估这两种测量技术之间的相关性。连续波设备测量的收缩期峰值与舒张末期(S/D)比值与脉冲多普勒设备测量的结果无统计学差异(P>0.05)。无论由一名观察者(r = 0.93)还是两名观察者(r = 0.89)测量,每种设备测量的脐动脉S/D比值均显示出很强的相关性。子宫动脉比值显示出较弱但仍显著的相关性(r = 0.57)。对于脐动脉和子宫动脉S/D比值的识别和测量,脉冲多普勒并非常规必需。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验