Mehalek K E, Berkowitz G S, Chitkara U, Rosenberg J, Berkowitz R L
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Oct;72(4):603-6.
Continuous-wave and pulsed Doppler ultrasound measurements of blood flow velocity waveforms of both uterine and umbilical arteries were performed on 85 patients to assess the correlation between these two measurements techniques. Peak systolic to end-diastolic (S/D) ratios measured by continuous-wave devices were not statistically different (P greater than .05) from those measured by a pulsed Doppler device. The S/D ratios of the umbilical artery measured by each device showed a strong correlation, whether measured by one observer (r = 0.93) or two observers (r = 0.89). Uterine artery ratios showed a weaker, although still significant, correlation (r = 0.57). Pulsed Doppler is not routinely necessary for the identification and measurement of umbilical and uterine artery S/D ratios.
对85例患者进行了子宫动脉和脐动脉血流速度波形的连续波和脉冲多普勒超声测量,以评估这两种测量技术之间的相关性。连续波设备测量的收缩期峰值与舒张末期(S/D)比值与脉冲多普勒设备测量的结果无统计学差异(P>0.05)。无论由一名观察者(r = 0.93)还是两名观察者(r = 0.89)测量,每种设备测量的脐动脉S/D比值均显示出很强的相关性。子宫动脉比值显示出较弱但仍显著的相关性(r = 0.57)。对于脐动脉和子宫动脉S/D比值的识别和测量,脉冲多普勒并非常规必需。