Tyan Paul, Mourad Jamal, Wright Brian, Winter Marc, Garza Devon, Smith Rachael, Brink Janel, Wei Chapman, Moawad Gaby
University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
University of Arizona College of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Jan;232:70-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
High-risk pregnancy stratification and the use of Progesterone and prophylactic cerclage based on prior obstetrical outcomes and cervical length screening have been successful in curbing the impact of preterm birth. However, a large number of women will still suffer from preterm delivery even with optimal management. Experts agree that a transabdominal cerclage is the next best option for women who fail a transvaginal cerclage in a prior pregnancy. Our primary objective with this study is to assess the obstetric benefits and feasibility of robotic-assisted transabdominal cerclage in high-risk women projected to have poor obstetric outcomes.
A multicenter retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive patients undergoing a robotic-assisted transabdominal cerclage (RA-TAC) for obstetric indications at two urban teaching university hospital and one academically affiliated community hospital. High-volume gynecologic surgeons performed all transabdominal cerclage procedures (N = 68). To assess whether the transabdominal cerclage had any effect on subsequent pregnancies, we categorized gestational age into ordinal variables and used a two-proportion z-test to compare pregnancy outcomes and neonatal survival pre (n = 200) and post (n = 59) abdominal cerclage placement.
A total of 68 consecutive patients undergoing a RA-TAC for obstetric indications were selected. We compared 200 pregnancies pre-robot-assisted cerclage to 59 pregnancies post-robot-assisted cerclage. The odds of delivering after 34 and 37 weeks gestational age was 4.0 and 3.6 times greater post-robot-assisted cerclage, respectively (P < 0.001). The RA-TAC also had a significant effect on neonatal survival. The odds of neonatal survival was 12.6 times greater after RA-TAC placement when compared to prior pregnancy outcomes. Surgical outcomes were also favorable with no conversions to laparotomy or perioperative pregnancy loss.
The RA-TAC influences an increase in gestational age and improves neonatal survival in women projected to have poor pregnancy outcomes. The robot-assisted transabdominal cerclages provide excellent obstetric outcomes without the morbidity of a laparotomy or the technical challenges associated with a conventional straight-stick laparoscopy. This procedure is not intended to replace any other minimally invasive modality for cerclage placement but rather increase awareness of a less technically challenging option for transabdominal cerclage placement to help propagate the procedure to more patients.
基于既往产科结局和宫颈长度筛查进行高危妊娠分层,并使用黄体酮和预防性宫颈环扎术,已成功遏制早产的影响。然而,即使进行了最佳管理,仍有大量女性会发生早产。专家们一致认为,对于先前妊娠中经阴道宫颈环扎术失败的女性,经腹宫颈环扎术是次优选择。本研究的主要目的是评估机器人辅助经腹宫颈环扎术对预计产科结局不良的高危女性的产科益处和可行性。
对两家城市教学大学医院和一家学术附属社区医院中因产科指征接受机器人辅助经腹宫颈环扎术(RA-TAC)的连续患者进行多中心回顾性队列分析。高年资妇科外科医生实施了所有经腹宫颈环扎术(N = 68)。为了评估经腹宫颈环扎术对后续妊娠是否有任何影响,我们将孕周分类为有序变量,并使用双比例z检验比较宫颈环扎术前(n = 200)和术后(n = 59)的妊娠结局和新生儿存活率。
共选择了68例因产科指征接受RA-TAC的连续患者。我们将机器人辅助宫颈环扎术前的200次妊娠与术后的59次妊娠进行了比较。孕周在34周和37周后分娩的几率在机器人辅助宫颈环扎术后分别高出4.0倍和3.6倍(P < 0.001)。RA-TAC对新生儿存活率也有显著影响。与先前的妊娠结局相比,RA-TAC放置后新生儿存活的几率高出12.6倍。手术结局也良好,没有转为开腹手术或围手术期妊娠丢失。
RA-TAC可使预计妊娠结局不良的女性孕周增加,并提高新生儿存活率。机器人辅助经腹宫颈环扎术提供了良好的产科结局,且没有开腹手术的并发症或传统直棒式腹腔镜检查相关的技术挑战。本手术并非旨在取代任何其他用于宫颈环扎术的微创方式,而是提高对经腹宫颈环扎术技术难度较低的一种选择的认识,以帮助将该手术推广到更多患者。