Suppr超能文献

手术修复的死亡率与外伤性门静脉损伤患者的结扎相似。

The mortality for surgical repair is similar to ligation in patients with traumatic portal vein injury.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Ariz.

Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Ariz.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 May;7(3):399-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Nov 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Portal vein injury is uncommon, and the optimal treatment is controversial. We compared the outcomes of ligation vs repair of portal injury using the National Trauma Data Bank.

METHODS

Adult patients who suffered portal injury were identified from the National Trauma Data Bank (2002-2014) by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis codes. Patients were stratified by treatment modality into no surgery, ligation, and surgical repair using International Classification of Diseases procedure codes. Outcomes including hospital mortality, bowel resection, and length of stay between ligation and surgical repair were compared by Kruskal-Wallis or Fisher exact test as appropriate. Multivariable analyses were performed with logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 752 patients with portal vein injury, 345 patients (45.9%) underwent no surgery, 103 patients (13.7%) had ligation, and 304 (40.4%) underwent surgical repair. Overall mortality was 49%. Age, sex, Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale score, presenting blood pressure, and heart rate were similar between groups that underwent ligation and surgical repair. The hospital mortality (59.2% vs 47.7%; P = .08), bowel resection (1.9% vs 1.0%; P = .55), and length of stay (12.5 vs 15.0 days; P = .08) were also comparable between ligation and repair in univariate analysis. In multivariable analysis, hospital mortality for surgical repair was similar to ligation (risk ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-1.16; P = .16).

CONCLUSIONS

Portal vein injury is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Surgical repair showed a trend for lower postoperative mortality than ligation, but this was not statistically significant on multivariate analysis. Repair of a traumatic portal vein injury should be attempted, but ligation is an acceptable alternative without an increase in bowel resection rates or a statistically significant increase in mortality.

摘要

背景

门静脉损伤并不常见,其最佳治疗方法存在争议。我们使用国家创伤数据库比较了结扎与修复门静脉损伤的结果。

方法

通过国际疾病分类第九版诊断代码从国家创伤数据库(2002-2014 年)中确定患有门静脉损伤的成年患者。根据国际疾病分类手术代码,将患者分为未手术、结扎和手术修复组。通过 Kruskal-Wallis 或 Fisher 精确检验比较各组的住院死亡率、肠切除术和结扎与手术修复之间的住院时间。采用逻辑回归进行多变量分析。

结果

在 752 例门静脉损伤患者中,345 例(45.9%)未行手术,103 例(13.7%)行结扎术,304 例(40.4%)行手术修复。总体死亡率为 49%。行结扎和手术修复的患者年龄、性别、损伤严重程度评分、格拉斯哥昏迷评分、就诊时血压和心率相似。单变量分析显示,手术死亡率(59.2%比 47.7%;P=0.08)、肠切除术(1.9%比 1.0%;P=0.55)和住院时间(12.5 天比 15.0 天;P=0.08)也无差异。多变量分析显示,手术修复的住院死亡率与结扎术相似(风险比,0.69;95%置信区间,0.41-1.16;P=0.16)。

结论

门静脉损伤与较高的死亡率和发病率相关。手术修复的术后死亡率低于结扎术,但多变量分析无统计学意义。应尝试修复创伤性门静脉损伤,但结扎术也是一种可接受的选择,不会增加肠切除术的发生率或死亡率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验