NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 25;8(11):e020433. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020433.
To evaluate the effectiveness of the online over 2 years, and examine the impact of intervention dose on outcomes.
Cluster randomised controlled trial.
Secondary schools in Australia.
1126 students (aged 14.9 years) from 11 schools.
Five schools were randomly allocated to the four-lesson internet-based module. This universal intervention uses cartoon storylines to deliver harm-minimisation information about ecstasy and new psychoactive substances (NPS). It was delivered during health education classes over 4 weeks. Six schools were randomised to the control group (health education as usual). Participants were not blinded to intervention allocation.
Students completed self-report surveys at baseline, post-test, 6, 12 and 24 months post-baseline. Intentions to use ecstasy and NPS (including synthetic cannabis and synthetic stimulants), knowledge about ecstasy and NPS and lifetime use of ecstasy and NPS were assessed. This paper reports the results at 24 months post-baseline.
Mixed effects regressions were conducted to analyse intervention effects from baseline to 24 months. Post hoc analyses using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting compared controls with students who: i) completed all four lessons ('full dose') and ii) partially completed the intervention (≤three lessons, 'incomplete dose').
Primary analyses found that controls were significantly more likely to intend on using synthetic cannabis compared with intervention group students (OR=3.56, p=0.01). Results from the weighted analyses indicated that controls reported significantly lower knowledge about ecstasy (p=0.001) and NPS (p=0.04) compared with the full-dose group. No significant differences were observed between the incomplete dose and control groups.
The online intervention was effective in modifying students' intentions to use synthetic cannabis up to 24 months; however, this study highlights the importance of delivering prevention programmes in full to maximise student outcomes.
ACTRN12613000708752.
评估为期 2 年以上的在线干预的效果,并考察干预剂量对结果的影响。
集群随机对照试验。
澳大利亚的中学。
11 所学校的 1126 名 14.9 岁的学生。
5 所学校被随机分配到四节课的基于互联网的 模块。这种普遍的干预措施使用卡通故事情节,提供关于摇头丸和新精神活性物质(NPS)的伤害最小化信息。它在 4 周的健康教育课期间提供。6 所学校被随机分配到对照组(常规健康教育)。参与者对干预分配不知情。
学生在基线、后测、6、12 和 24 个月后基线时完成自我报告调查。评估了使用摇头丸和 NPS(包括合成大麻和合成兴奋剂)的意图、关于摇头丸和 NPS 的知识以及摇头丸和 NPS 的终生使用情况。本文报告了基线后 24 个月的结果。
采用混合效应回归分析从基线到 24 个月的干预效果。使用逆概率治疗加权的事后分析比较了对照组和完成所有四节课(“全剂量”)和 ii)部分完成干预(≤三节课,“不完全剂量”)的学生。
主要分析发现,与干预组学生相比,对照组学生更有可能打算使用合成大麻(OR=3.56,p=0.01)。加权分析的结果表明,与全剂量组相比,对照组报告的摇头丸(p=0.001)和 NPS(p=0.04)知识明显较低。不完全剂量组与对照组之间没有观察到显著差异。
在线干预在 24 个月内有效改变了学生使用合成大麻的意图;然而,这项研究强调了充分提供预防计划以最大限度地提高学生成果的重要性。
ACTRN12613000708752。