Uribe Mari Carmen, Grier Harry J, Parenti Lynne R
Facultad de Ciencias, Laboratorio de Biología de la Reproducción Animal, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 México, D.F., Mexico.
Division of Fishes, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, P.O. Box 37012, MRC 159, District of Columbia.
J Morphol. 2018 Dec;279(12):1787-1797. doi: 10.1002/jmor.20901. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
The cyprinodontiform family Goodeidae comprises some 51 species, including subspecies, of freshwater fishes all of which are at risk or are extinct in the wild. It is classified in two allopatric subfamilies: the Goodeinae, endemic to the Mexican Plateau, and the Empetrichthyinae, known only from relict taxa in Nevada and southern California. The 41 species of goodeins are all viviparous and share a set of well-documented reproductive characters. In contrast, the recent species or subspecies of empetrichthyins are all oviparous and relatively poorly known, yet of critical interest in understanding the evolution of livebearing in the family. We previously described ovarian structure and oogenesis in empetrichthyins using archival museum specimens of females and here extend that study to males. Testicular characters of two species of empetrichthyins, Crenichthys baileyi, and Empetrichthys latos, are studied and compared directly with those of one species of viviparous goodeid, Ataeniobius toweri. The testis is a restricted spermatogonial type in both the Empetrichthyinae and the Goodeinae: spermatogonia are found solely at the distal termini of lobules, a diagnostic character of atherinomorph fishes. Morphology of the differentiation of germinal cells during spermatogenesis is similar in both subfamilies. In the oviparous C. baileyi and E. latos spermatozoa are free in the deferent ducts. In contrast, the spermatozoa of viviparous goodeids are organized into numerous bundles called spermatozeugmata, a characteristic of most fishes that practice internal fertilization. Differences between the goodeid subfamilies are interpreted relative to the oviparous versus viviparous modes of reproduction. Archival museum specimens are a reliable source of data on reproductive morphology, including histology, and may be the only specimens available of rare or extinct taxa.
鳉形目古氏鱼科约有51个物种,包括亚种,均为淡水鱼,目前所有物种在野外均面临濒危或已经灭绝。该科分为两个异域分布的亚科:仅分布于墨西哥高原的古氏亚科,以及仅在内华达州和南加利福尼亚州的残遗类群中发现的艾氏亚科。古氏亚科的41个物种均为胎生,具有一系列有充分文献记载的生殖特征。相比之下,艾氏亚科最近的物种或亚种均为卵生,人们对它们了解相对较少,但对于理解该科胎生现象的进化至关重要。我们之前利用馆藏雌性标本描述了艾氏亚科鱼类的卵巢结构和卵子发生过程,在此将研究扩展至雄性。对艾氏亚科的两种鱼类贝利氏泉脂鲤和宽体艾氏鱼的睾丸特征进行了研究,并直接与一种胎生古氏鱼——托氏无带鳉的睾丸特征进行了比较。艾氏亚科和古氏亚科的睾丸均为有限精原细胞类型:精原细胞仅存在于小叶的远端,这是银汉鱼目的一个诊断特征。两个亚科在精子发生过程中生发细胞分化的形态学特征相似。在卵生的贝利氏泉脂鲤和宽体艾氏鱼中,精子在输精管中是游离的。相比之下,胎生古氏鱼的精子被组织成许多束,称为精子束,这是大多数进行体内受精的鱼类的特征。古氏鱼亚科之间的差异与卵生和胎生的繁殖方式有关。馆藏标本是生殖形态学数据(包括组织学数据)的可靠来源,对于珍稀或已灭绝类群而言,可能是唯一可用的标本。