• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有多种医疗保健需求的患者,以及优先考虑处境较差的患者。

Patients with multiple needs for healthcare and priority to the worse off.

机构信息

Division of Health Care Analysis, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping university, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Bioethics. 2019 Feb;33(2):261-266. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12535. Epub 2018 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1111/bioe.12535
PMID:30480809
Abstract

There is a growing body of literature which suggests that decisions about healthcare priority setting should take into account the extent to which patients are worse off. However, such decisions are often based on how badly off patients are with respect to the condition targeted by the treatment whose priority is under consideration (condition-specific severity). In this paper I argue that giving priority to the worse off in terms of condition-specific severity does not reflect the morally relevant sense of being worse off. I conclude that an account of giving priority to the worse off relevant for healthcare priority setting should take into account how badly off patients are when all of their conditions are considered (holistic severity).

摘要

越来越多的文献表明,医疗保健优先事项的决策应该考虑到患者的困境程度。然而,此类决策往往基于患者在接受优先考虑的治疗所针对的疾病方面的严重程度(疾病特异性严重程度)。在本文中,我认为根据疾病特异性严重程度来优先考虑病情更严重的患者,并不能反映出在道德上更严重的困境。我的结论是,对于医疗保健优先事项设置而言,优先考虑更严重的患者的理由应该考虑到当所有病情都被考虑在内时患者的困境程度(整体严重程度)。

相似文献

1
Patients with multiple needs for healthcare and priority to the worse off.有多种医疗保健需求的患者,以及优先考虑处境较差的患者。
Bioethics. 2019 Feb;33(2):261-266. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12535. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
2
Treatment-as-prevention needs to be considered in the just allocation of HIV drugs.在公正分配艾滋病毒药物时,需要考虑治疗即预防的理念。
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Dec;11(12):48-50. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.613524.
3
A step toward pluralist fairness.迈向多元公平的一步。
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Dec;11(12):46-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.613527.
4
Inequalities in HIV care: chances versus outcomes.艾滋病护理中的不平等:机会与结果
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Dec;11(12):42-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.615890.
5
Creating moral conflict through an inequality sensitive summary measure.通过一个对不平等敏感的汇总指标制造道德冲突。
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Dec;11(12):44-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.613526.
6
Two sorts of health maximization: average view and total view.两种健康最大化:平均观点和总体观点。
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Dec;11(12):41-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.613522.
7
[Ethical basis of priority setting in healthcare].[医疗保健中确定优先次序的伦理基础]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Sep;53(9):867-73. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1116-x.
8
Rethinking patient involvement in healthcare priority setting.重新思考患者在医疗保健优先级设定中的参与。
Bioethics. 2020 May;34(4):403-411. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12730.
9
Inequalities and healthcare reform in Chile: equity of what?智利的不平等与医疗改革:何种公平?
J Med Ethics. 2008 Sep;34(9):e13. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.022715.
10
Attitudes towards priority-setting and rationing in healthcare -- an exploratory survey of Swedish medical students.瑞典医学生对医疗保健中确定优先次序和资源分配的态度——一项探索性调查
Scand J Public Health. 2009 Mar;37(2):122-30. doi: 10.1177/1403494808100276. Epub 2009 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The Ethical Basis of Severity as a Priority Setting Criterion in Healthcare-Egalitarian or Prioritarian?医疗保健中以严重程度作为优先排序标准的伦理基础——平等主义还是优先主义?
J Bioeth Inq. 2025 Sep 11. doi: 10.1007/s11673-025-10472-1.
2
Severity as a moral qualifier of malady.严重性作为疾病的道德修饰语。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Mar 31;24(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00903-2.
3
Severity as a Priority Setting Criterion: Setting a Challenging Research Agenda.严重性作为优先设置标准:制定具有挑战性的研究议程。
Health Care Anal. 2020 Mar;28(1):25-44. doi: 10.1007/s10728-019-00371-z.