Suppr超能文献

肉眼血尿和镜下血尿

Gross and Microscopic Hematuria

作者信息

Leslie Stephen W., Hamawy Karim, Saleem Muhammad O.

机构信息

Creighton University School of Medicine

Lahey Health

Abstract

Hematuria, defined as the abnormal presence of blood in the urine, ranks among the most commonly diagnosed urological disorders, accounting for over 20% of all urological evaluations. While hematuria can be classified in multiple ways—eg, intermittent or constant, glomerular or nonglomerular, and symptomatic or asymptomatic—the most clinically useful distinction separates cases into gross (visible) and microscopic (invisible) hematuria. Microhematuria is defined as the detection of 3 or more urinary red blood cells (RBCs) per high-power field (HPF) on microscopic urinalysis without an apparent cause, while the urine’s visual appearance remains normal. Urinary dipstick findings alone do not provide a definitive diagnosis of microscopic hematuria and require confirmation through one or more microscopic urinalyses. Microscopic examination of urinary sediment must always accompany dipstick-positive findings to verify microhematuria. The absence of microscopic RBCs in strongly dipstick-positive samples suggests alternative causes, eg, myoglobinuria, hemoglobinuria from lysed erythrocytes, or other forms of pseudohematuria. Blood from recent urological procedures, urinary tract infections (UTIs), or contamination from rectal or vaginal bleeding must also be excluded. This approach addresses the relatively high incidence of false positives and negatives associated with dipstick testing alone. Microscopic hematuria can be further categorized into symptomatic microhematuria, asymptomatic microhematuria with proteinuria—indicative of potential glomerular disease—and asymptomatic microhematuria without proteinuria, which raises concern for possible urothelial malignancy. Microscopic urinalysis can also detect urinary infections and abnormal urinary sediment not identified by dipstick, eg, crystals, casts, and dysmorphic RBCs, thereby supporting the diagnosis of the underlying pathology. Enhancing primary care education on definitions of hematuria and initial diagnostic steps can reduce unnecessary testing and referrals while improving the management of patients with confirmed microhematuria. Renal or urothelial malignancy represents the most severe potential cause of hematuria. Evidence indicates that many patients with true microhematuria are not evaluated appropriately or referred promptly to urology, potentially delaying cancer diagnosis and worsening outcomes. One study found that only 41% of primary care patients with dipstick-diagnosed microscopic hematuria received confirmatory microscopic urinalysis, and of those, only 24% had 3 or more RBC/HPF, confirming microhematuria. Another study found that 84% of patients with positive microscopic urinalysis were not further evaluated or tested, highlighting dangerous lapses in guideline implementation. Addressing these gaps is critical to enable early diagnosis of life-threatening conditions and optimize patient outcomes. Multiple classifications stratify patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories. The most widely used and validated framework follows the updated 2025 American Urological Association Guideline on Microhematuria Risk Stratification. Some sources advocate for a more stringent requirement of at least 2 or 3 confirmed microscopic findings before confirming hematuria. In cases where only a single microscopic finding is present, periodic follow-up urinalyses for at least 1 year are recommended if no further workup is performed after the initial result.

摘要

血尿定义为尿液中异常出现血液。它是最常被诊断出的泌尿系统疾病之一,占所有泌尿系统评估的20%以上。虽然血尿有许多分类(例如,间歇性或持续性、肾小球性或非肾小球性、有症状或无症状),但临床上最有用的分类是肉眼血尿或镜下血尿(即微血尿)。肉眼血尿是指尿液中可见血液。微血尿是通过尿试纸条检测或显微镜尿分析发现尿中红细胞(RBC),尽管尿液外观正常。2020年美国泌尿外科学会微血尿指南用于诊断微血尿的最低标准是在未离心标本的显微镜检查中发现≥3个RBC/HPF且无法解释。制定该指南是因为单独使用尿试纸条时假阳性和假阴性的发生率相对较高。必须排除近期泌尿系统手术、尿路感染(UTI)的血液以及直肠或阴道出血的污染。在一项研究中,初级保健临床医生通过尿试纸条诊断为镜下血尿的患者中,只有41%进行了显微镜分析。在进行显微镜分析的患者中,只有24%的患者RBC/HPF>3。这表明加强对血尿定义的教育有助于避免不必要的检查和转诊。一些资料建议使用更严格的标准,即至少有2次甚至3次确诊的镜下血尿结果。在这种情况下,如果在初始诊断后未进行进一步检查,仅检测到单次镜下血尿结果时,建议至少进行一年的定期随访尿分析。镜下血尿可进一步细分为有症状的微血尿、伴有蛋白尿的无症状微血尿(提示肾小球疾病)和不伴有蛋白尿的无症状微血尿(提示可能存在尿路上皮恶性肿瘤)。显微镜尿分析还可以识别尿试纸条未检测到的泌尿系统感染和相关尿沉渣(如晶体和管型),这有助于诊断潜在的病理情况。尿试纸条阳性的尿液样本中未发现镜下红细胞提示肌红蛋白尿、红细胞溶解导致的血红蛋白尿或其他假性血尿原因。对尿沉渣进行显微镜检查必须始终确认尿试纸条对微血尿的初步诊断。血尿最严重和毁灭性的后果是恶性肿瘤。有许多分类方法将患者分为低、中、高风险;一个常用且经过验证的系统是2020年美国泌尿外科学会微血尿风险分层指南。有证据表明,大多数真正的镜下血尿患者没有被适当地转诊至泌尿外科,这可能导致恶性肿瘤的诊断延迟。

相似文献

3
Dipstick pseudohematuria: unnecessary consultation and evaluation.尿试纸法假性血尿:无需咨询和评估。
J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):560-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.049. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
10
Screening for Microscopic Hematuria in a Urogynecologic Population.筛查泌尿妇科人群中的镜下血尿。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jun;26(6):382-386. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000733.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验