Suppr超能文献

心理倡导促进康复(PATH):家庭暴力服务环境中一种心理干预的随机对照试验。

Psychological advocacy towards healing (PATH): A randomized controlled trial of a psychological intervention in a domestic violence service setting.

机构信息

Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Nov 27;13(11):e0205485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205485. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Experience of domestic violence and abuse (DVA) is associated with mental illness. Advocacy has little effect on mental health outcomes of female DVA survivors and there is uncertainty about the effectiveness of psychological interventions for this population.

OBJECTIVE

To test effectiveness of a psychological intervention delivered by advocates to DVA survivors.

DESIGN, MASKING, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Pragmatic parallel group individually randomized controlled trial of normal DVA advocacy vs. advocacy + psychological intervention. Statistician and researchers blinded to group assignment. Setting: specialist DVA agencies; two UK cities. Participants: Women aged 16 years and older accessing DVA services.

INTERVENTION

Eight specialist psychological advocacy (SPA) sessions with two follow up sessions.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcomes at 12 months: depression symptoms (PHQ-9) and psychological distress (CORE-OM). Primary analysis: intention to treat linear (logistic) regression model for continuous (binary) outcomes.

RESULTS

263 women recruited (78 in shelter/refuge, 185 in community), 2 withdrew (1 community, control group; 1 intervention, refuge group), 1 was excluded from the study for protocol violation (community, control group), 130 in intervention and 130 in control groups. Recruitment ended June 2013. 12-month follow up: 64%. At 12-month follow up greater improvement in mental health of women in the intervention group. Difference in average CORE-OM score between intervention and control groups: -3.3 points (95% CI -5.5 to -1.2). Difference in average PHQ-9 score between intervention and control group: -2.2 (95% CI -4.1 to -0.3). At 12 months, 35% of the intervention group and 55% of the control group were above the CORE-OM -2clinical threshold (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.64); 29% of the intervention group and 46% of the control group were above the PHQ-9 clinical threshold (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.81).

LIMITATIONS

64% retention at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

An eight-session psychological intervention delivered by DVA advocates produced clinically relevant improvement in mental health outcomes compared with normal advocacy care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN registry ISRCTN58561170 Original Research 3675/3750.

摘要

背景

家庭暴力和虐待(DVA)的经历与精神疾病有关。倡导对女性 DVA 幸存者的心理健康结果几乎没有影响,而且对于这一人群的心理干预的有效性存在不确定性。

目的

测试由倡导者为 DVA 幸存者提供的心理干预的有效性。

设计、掩蔽、设置、参与者:正常 DVA 倡导与倡导+心理干预的平行组个体随机对照试验。统计员和研究人员对分组分配不知情。设置:专门的 DVA 机构;两个英国城市。参与者:年龄在 16 岁及以上,接受 DVA 服务的女性。

干预措施

八次专门的心理倡导(SPA)会议,两次随访。

测量

12 个月时的主要结果:抑郁症状(PHQ-9)和心理困扰(CORE-OM)。主要分析:连续(二项)结果的意向治疗线性(逻辑)回归模型。

结果

共招募 263 名女性(避难所/庇护所 78 名,社区 185 名),2 名退出(1 名社区,对照组;1 名干预组,庇护所组),1 名因违反方案被排除(社区,对照组),130 名干预组和 130 名对照组。招募于 2013 年 6 月结束。12 个月随访:64%。在 12 个月时,干预组女性的心理健康有更大的改善。干预组和对照组之间 CORE-OM 平均评分的差异:-3.3 分(95%CI-5.5 至-1.2)。干预组和对照组之间 PHQ-9 平均评分的差异:-2.2(95%CI-4.1 至-0.3)。在 12 个月时,干预组有 35%的人,对照组有 55%的人在 CORE-OM-2 临床阈值以上(OR 0.32,95%CI 0.16 至 0.64);干预组有 29%的人,对照组有 46%的人在 PHQ-9 临床阈值以上(OR 0.41,95%CI 0.21 至 0.81)。

局限性

12 个月时的保留率为 64%。

结论

与正常倡导护理相比,由 DVA 倡导者提供的八节心理干预在心理健康结果方面产生了具有临床意义的改善。

试验注册

ISRCTN 注册 ISRCTN58561170 原始研究 3675/3750。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeee/6258512/f415484ed367/pone.0205485.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验