Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Miyakojima IGRT Clinic, Miyakojima-ku, Osaka, Japan.
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 27;13(11):e0208086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208086. eCollection 2018.
Stereotactic body radiation therapy with CyberKnife for prostate cancer has long treatment times compared with conventional radiotherapy. This arises the need for designing treatment plans with short execution times. We propose an objective function for plan quality evaluation, which was used to determine an optimal combination between small and large collimators based on short treatment times and clinically acceptable dose distributions. Data from 11 prostate cancer patients were used. For each patient, 20 plans were created based on all combinations between one small (⌀ 10-25 mm) and one large (⌀ 35-60 mm) Iris collimator size. The objective function was assigned to each combination as a penalty, such that plans with low penalties were considered superior. This function considered the achievement of dosimetric planning goals, tumor control probability, normal tissue complication probability, relative seriality parameter, and treatment time. Two methods were used to determine the optimal combination. First, we constructed heat maps representing the mean penalty values and standard deviations of the plans created for each collimator combination. The combination giving a plan with the smallest mean penalty and standard deviation was considered optimal. Second, we created two groups of superior plans: group A plans were selected by histogram analysis and group B plans were selected by choosing the plan with the lowest penalty from each patient. In both groups, the most used small and large collimators were assumed to represent the optimal combination. The optimal combinations obtained from the heat maps included the 25 mm as a small collimator, giving small/large collimator sizes of 25/35, 25/40, 25/50, and 25/60 mm. The superior-group analysis indicated that 25/50 mm was the optimal combination. The optimal Iris combination for prostate cancer treatment using CyberKnife was determined to be a collimator size between 25 mm (small) and 50 mm (large).
立体定向体部放射治疗(CyberKnife)治疗前列腺癌的治疗时间明显长于传统放疗。这就需要设计出执行时间短的治疗计划。我们提出了一种用于评估计划质量的目标函数,该函数用于在短治疗时间和可接受的临床剂量分布之间确定小准直器和大准直器的最佳组合。使用了 11 例前列腺癌患者的数据。对于每个患者,根据小(⌀ 10-25mm)和大(⌀ 35-60mm)虹膜准直器尺寸的所有组合,创建了 20 个计划。将目标函数分配给每个组合作为惩罚,惩罚值低的计划被认为更好。该函数考虑了达到剂量学计划目标、肿瘤控制概率、正常组织并发症概率、相对连续性参数和治疗时间。使用了两种方法来确定最佳组合。首先,我们构建了热图,代表为每个准直器组合创建的计划的平均惩罚值和标准偏差。考虑使用组合给出的计划具有最小的平均惩罚和标准偏差。其次,我们创建了两组优质计划:通过直方图分析选择 A 组计划,从每位患者中选择具有最低惩罚的计划选择 B 组计划。在这两组中,使用最频繁的小和大准直器被认为代表了最佳组合。从热图中获得的最佳组合包括将 25mm 作为小准直器,给出小/大准直器尺寸为 25/35、25/40、25/50 和 25/60mm。在优质组分析中,发现 25/50mm 是最佳组合。使用 CyberKnife 治疗前列腺癌的最佳虹膜组合被确定为介于 25mm(小)和 50mm(大)之间的准直器尺寸。