Suppr超能文献

红外热成像技术在颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断中的有效性如何?系统评价。

Is infrared thermography effective in the diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders? A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Oral Diagnosis, State University of Paraíba, Campina Grande, Brazil.

Department of Oral Diagnosis, State University of Paraíba, Campina Grande, Brazil.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019 Feb;127(2):185-192. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Sep 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to systematically review the scientific efficacy of infrared thermography (IT) on the diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs).

STUDY DESIGN

An electronic search was performed in 8 databases for publications up to May 2018. Additionally, a hand search of the reference lists was conducted. There were no restrictions on language or on year of publication. Two independent reviewers selected the studies, reviewed the abstract information, and assessed the quality. The methodology of the included articles was evaluated by using the QUADAS-2 tool.

RESULTS

Nine studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review. Four studies concluded that IT presents low accuracy or is not an accurate instrument for TMD diagnosis, but there was substantial variation in sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic curve values. Five studies concluded that IT appears to be promising or may be a complementary diagnostic aid in the evaluation of TMDs. These studies presented sensitivity values ranging from 70% to 90% and specificity values ranging from 62% to 92%. All studies were judged as being "at risk of bias" and as having "concerns regarding applicability."

CONCLUSIONS

The literature is still lacking in sufficient number of studies regarding the reliability of IT for the diagnosis of TMDs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在系统回顾红外热成像(IT)在诊断颞下颌关节紊乱(TMD)方面的科学疗效。

研究设计

对截至 2018 年 5 月的 8 个数据库进行电子检索。此外,还对手头文献进行了检索。研究无语言或出版年限限制。两位独立的评审员选择研究、审查摘要信息并评估质量。使用 QUADAS-2 工具评估纳入文章的方法学。

结果

符合纳入标准的研究有 9 项,被纳入系统评价。四项研究得出结论,认为 IT 准确度低或不是 TMD 诊断的准确仪器,但灵敏度、特异性和受试者工作特征曲线值存在较大差异。五项研究得出结论,认为 IT 似乎很有前途,或者可能是 TMD 评估的一种补充诊断辅助手段。这些研究的灵敏度值范围为 70%至 90%,特异性值范围为 62%至 92%。所有研究均被判定为“存在偏倚风险”和“对适用性存在担忧”。

结论

关于 IT 诊断 TMD 的可靠性,文献中仍然缺乏足够数量的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验