Suppr超能文献

一种基于临床的预测肝门部胆管癌患者生存的新分期系统的结果与验证

Outcome and validation of a new clinically based staging system for predicting survival of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients.

作者信息

Laoveeravat Passisd, Jaruvongvanich Veeravich, Wongjarupong Nicha, Linlawan Sittikorn, Tanpowpong Natthaporn, Phathong Chonlada, Phatharacharukul Parkpoom, Treeprasertsuk Sombat, Rerknimitr Rungsun, Chaiteerakij Roongruedee

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital Bangkok Thailand.

Department of Internal medicine University of Hawaii Honolulu Hawaii USA.

出版信息

JGH Open. 2017 Oct 6;1(2):56-61. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12009. eCollection 2017 Oct.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Currently available staging systems for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are not applicable to patients with unresectable stage. A new clinical staging system for perihilar CCA (pCCA) subtype has been recently developed in a US cohort, with a good performance in predicting survival of all pCCA patients. We aimed to determine outcomes of pCCA patients and evaluate predictive performance of this staging system in an Asian population.

METHODS

All 141 patients diagnosed with pCCA between 2003 and 2012 were identified. Clinical information was retrospectively abstracted. Patients were classified into four stages based on the new staging system. Survival predictors were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 141 pCCA patients, 38 (27%), 101 (72%), and 2 (1%) received resection, palliative biliary drainage ± chemotherapy, and best supportive care, respectively. Survival predictors included resectable disease, tumor size, distant metastasis, and cancer antigen 19-9 ≥ 1000 U/mL. When classified by clinical stages, 13, 4, 99, and 25 patients were in stages I, II, III, and IV, with median survivals of 18.4, 7.3, 6.3, and 2.6 months; and hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.0 (reference), 1.7 (0.5-5.5), 3.2 (1.5-6.7), and 10.8 (4.6-25.0), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The clinical staging system has a limited performance in differentiating stage II pCCA patients from stage III patients in the Thai cohort. This can be due to differences in patient characteristics and treatment modalities between the Asian and White pCCA populations. However, the median survivals of patients with other stages are significantly different.

摘要

背景与目的

目前可用的胆管癌(CCA)分期系统不适用于不可切除阶段的患者。最近在美国队列中开发了一种针对肝门周围CCA(pCCA)亚型的新临床分期系统,在预测所有pCCA患者的生存方面表现良好。我们旨在确定pCCA患者的预后,并评估该分期系统在亚洲人群中的预测性能。

方法

确定了2003年至2012年间诊断为pCCA的所有141例患者。回顾性提取临床信息。根据新的分期系统将患者分为四个阶段。使用Cox比例风险分析来分析生存预测因素。

结果

在141例pCCA患者中,分别有38例(27%)、101例(72%)和2例(1%)接受了手术切除、姑息性胆管引流±化疗以及最佳支持治疗。生存预测因素包括可切除疾病、肿瘤大小、远处转移以及癌抗原19-9≥1000 U/mL。按临床分期分类时,I期、II期、III期和IV期分别有13例、4例、99例和25例患者,中位生存期分别为18.4个月、7.3个月、6.3个月和2.6个月;风险比(95%置信区间)分别为1.0(参考值)、1.7(0.5-5.5)、3.2(1.5-6.7)和10.8(4.6-25.0)。

结论

在泰国队列中,该临床分期系统在区分II期pCCA患者和III期患者方面性能有限。这可能是由于亚洲和白种人pCCA人群在患者特征和治疗方式上存在差异。然而,其他阶段患者的中位生存期有显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c7c/6207049/1e1f6c7d9d97/JGH3-1-56-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验