• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[种植体-基台连接处微观形态差异的研究]

[Investigation of the micromorphological differences of the implant-abutment junction].

作者信息

Li Xiao-Na, Mattheos Nikos

机构信息

Special Clinic, Dalian Stomatological Hospital . Dalian 116021,Liaoning Province, China. E-mail:

出版信息

Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2018 Aug;27(4):360-364.

PMID:30483701
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the morphological micro-features of 3 commercially available implant-abutment joints, using compatible and original prosthetic components and to explore the correlation between the micromorphology and potential functional complications.

METHODS

Three abutments (one original and two compatibles) were torqued on original Straumann RN implants, according to the manufacturer's instructions. The implant-abutment units were sliced in the microtome and photographed under different magnifications through a scanning electron microscope. Calibration measurements were conducted under magnification corresponding to the area under assessment.

RESULTS

Major dimensional differences were identified between all studied contact areas of the three units. The tight contact in the implant shoulder was similar in all three units, but engagement of the internal connection and, in particular, the anti-rotation elements were seriously compromised in the compatible abutments. One compatible abutment demonstrated compromised engagement of the abutment screw as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Compatible abutments can present critical morphological differences from the original ones. The differences in the cross-sectional geometry result in large differences in the overall contact areas, both in terms of quality and quantity which could have serious implications from the long-term stability of the prosthesis.

摘要

目的

本初步研究旨在使用兼容和原装修复组件,研究3种市售种植体-基台连接的形态微观特征,并探讨微观形态与潜在功能并发症之间的相关性。

方法

根据制造商的说明,将三个基台(一个原装和两个兼容)拧在原装的士卓曼RN种植体上。将种植体-基台单元在切片机上切片,并通过扫描电子显微镜在不同放大倍数下拍照。在与评估区域相对应的放大倍数下进行校准测量。

结果

在三个单元的所有研究接触区域之间发现了主要尺寸差异。所有三个单元在种植体肩部的紧密接触相似,但兼容基台的内部连接,特别是抗旋转元件的啮合严重受损。一个兼容基台的基台螺钉啮合也受到损害。

结论

兼容基台可能与原装基台存在关键的形态差异。横截面几何形状的差异导致整体接触面积在质量和数量上存在很大差异,这可能对假体的长期稳定性产生严重影响。

相似文献

1
[Investigation of the micromorphological differences of the implant-abutment junction].[种植体-基台连接处微观形态差异的研究]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2018 Aug;27(4):360-364.
2
Investigating the micromorphological differences of the implant-abutment junction and their clinical implications: a pilot study.研究种植体-基台连接处的微观形态差异及其临床意义:一项初步研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Nov;27(11):e134-e143. doi: 10.1111/clr.12578. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
3
Micromorphological differences of the implant-abutment junction and in vitro load testing for three different titanium abutments on Straumann tissue level implants.三种不同钛基台在 Straumann 组织水平种植体上的种植体-基台连接部的微观形态差异和体外负载测试
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Dec;28(12):1523-1531. doi: 10.1111/clr.13021. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
4
Differences in micromorphology of the implant-abutment junction for original and third-party abutments on a representative dental implant.代表性种植体中原装和第三方基台的种植体-基台连接部微观形态的差异。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Jan;121(1):143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.015. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
5
In Vitro Characterization of Original and Nonoriginal Implant Abutments.原装和非原装种植体基台的体外特性研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Nov/Dec;33(6):1229-1239. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6921.
6
Load to failure of different titanium abutments for an internal hexagon implant.用于内六角种植体的不同钛基台的加载至失效试验
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Oct;114(4):513-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.012. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
7
Original vs compatible stock abutment- implant connection: An in vitro analysis of the internal accuracy and mechanical fatigue behaviour.原始与兼容基台-种植体连接:内部精度和机械疲劳行为的体外分析。
J Prosthodont Res. 2022 Jul 30;66(3):476-483. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00066. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
8
Fracture strength of zirconia implant abutments on narrow diameter implants with internal and external implant abutment connections: A study on the titanium resin base concept.带内连接和外连接的种植体基台的窄径氧化锆种植体的抗折强度:钛树脂基台概念的研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Apr;29(4):411-423. doi: 10.1111/clr.13139. Epub 2018 Mar 11.
9
Bending moments and types of failure of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal implant-abutment connections: a laboratory study.氧化锆和钛基台与内部种植体-基台连接的弯曲力矩和失效类型:一项实验室研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 May-Jun;27(3):505-12.
10
Original versus nonoriginal cast-to-gold abutment-implant connection: Analysis of the internal fit and long-term fatigue performance.原代与非原代铸造金基底-种植体连接体:内连接密合度与长期疲劳性能分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Jul;126(1):94.e1-94.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.020. Epub 2021 May 15.