Department of Pathophysiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2019 Mar;392(3):287-297. doi: 10.1007/s00210-018-1576-3. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
Liver injury, one of the major side effects of diclofenac (DIC), plagues thousands of patients who treated with it. Although involvements of metabolic factors, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial injury have been characterized, the exact immunomolecular mechanism of the hepatotoxicity of DIC still remains ambiguous. In this study, we investigated the role of chemokine receptors CCR2 and CCR5 in this progression. Ccr2, Ccr5, and Tnfr1/2-deficient mice, as well as wild type littermates, were administrated DIC or vehicle for 24 h, receptively. Hepatic expression of CCR2, CCR5, and their ligands were upregulated after DIC treatment. DIC-induced liver injury was augmented in Ccr2 mice than Ccr2 mice, a similar phenotype was observed in Ccr5-deficient mice. In addition, antagonists of CCR2 or CCR5 protected liver damage caused by diclofenac. Besides, the number of neutrophils present in the liver was gradually increased from 0 to 12 h after drug administration. However, the recruitment of neutrophils was dramatically lessened after blocking CCR2 or CCR5 signaling. Furthermore, TNF-α level in the liver was decreased in Ccr2 mice compared with Ccr2 mice. Intriguingly, in line with this, TNF receptor 1 and 2 double knockout mice showed markedly attenuated hepatotoxicity of DIC. These suggested that CCR2 and CCR5 mediated hepatotoxicity induced by diclofenac, TNF-α was responsible, at least in part, for it, and the pharmacological inhibition of CCR2 or CCR5 might serve as a novel therapeutic approach for DIC-induced hepatotoxicity.
肝损伤是双氯芬酸(DIC)的主要副作用之一,困扰着成千上万使用它治疗的患者。尽管已经确定了代谢因素、氧化应激和线粒体损伤的参与,但 DIC 肝毒性的确切免疫分子机制仍然不清楚。在这项研究中,我们研究了趋化因子受体 CCR2 和 CCR5 在这一进展中的作用。Ccr2、Ccr5 和 Tnfr1/2 缺陷小鼠以及野生型同窝小鼠分别接受 DIC 或载体处理 24 小时。DIC 处理后,肝组织中 CCR2、CCR5 及其配体的表达上调。与 Ccr2 小鼠相比,Ccr2 小鼠的 DIC 诱导的肝损伤增强,在 Ccr5 缺陷小鼠中观察到类似的表型。此外,CCR2 或 CCR5 的拮抗剂可保护双氯芬酸引起的肝损伤。此外,在给药后 0 至 12 小时,肝脏中中性粒细胞的数量逐渐增加。然而,阻断 CCR2 或 CCR5 信号后,中性粒细胞的募集明显减少。此外,与 Ccr2 小鼠相比,Ccr2 小鼠肝脏中的 TNF-α 水平降低。有趣的是,与此一致的是,TNF 受体 1 和 2 双敲除小鼠显示出 DIC 肝毒性明显减弱。这些表明 CCR2 和 CCR5 介导了双氯芬酸诱导的肝毒性,TNF-α 在其中起作用,至少部分起作用,而 CCR2 或 CCR5 的药理学抑制可能成为 DIC 诱导的肝毒性的一种新的治疗方法。