Suppr超能文献

非甾体抗炎药治疗的心血管安全性差异 - 一项全国范围内的骨关节炎患者研究。

Differences in cardiovascular safety with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy-A nationwide study in patients with osteoarthritis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019 May;124(5):629-641. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13182. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) and the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) used to relieve OA-associated pain have been linked independently to increased cardiovascular risk. We examined the risk of cardiovascular events associated with NSAID use in patients with OA. We employed linked nationwide administrative registers to examine NSAID use between 1996 and 2015 by Danish patients with OA aged ≥18 years. Using adjusted Cox proportional hazard analyses, we calculated the risk of the composite outcome of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and non-fatal ischaemic stroke/TIA, and of each outcome separately, up to 5 years after OA diagnosis. Of 533 502 patients included, 64.3% received NSAIDs and 38 226 (7.2%) experienced a cardiovascular event during follow-up. Compared with non-use, all NSAIDs were associated with increased risk of the composite outcome: hazard ratio (HR) for rofecoxib, 1.90 (95% confidence interval, 1.74-2.08); celecoxib, 1.47 (1.34-1.62); diclofenac, 1.44 (1.36-1.54); ibuprofen, 1.20 (1.15-1.25); and naproxen, 1.20 (1.04-1.39). Similar results were seen for each outcome separately. When celecoxib was used as reference, ibuprofen (HRs: 0.81 [CI: 0.74-0.90]) and naproxen (HRs: 0.81 [0.68-0.97]) exhibited a lower cardiovascular risk, even when low doses were compared. Low-dose naproxen and ibuprofen were associated with the lowest risks of the composite outcome compared to no NSAID use: HRs: 1.12 (1.07-1.19) and 1.16 (0.92-1.42), respectively. In patients with OA, we found significant differences in cardiovascular risk among NSAIDs. Naproxen and ibuprofen appeared to be safer compared to celecoxib, also when we examined equivalent low doses. In terms of cardiovascular safety, naproxen and ibuprofen, at the lowest effective doses, may be the preferred first choices among patients with OA needing pain relief.

摘要

骨关节炎 (OA) 和用于缓解 OA 相关疼痛的非甾体抗炎药 (NSAIDs) 已被独立证明与心血管风险增加有关。我们研究了 NSAIDs 在 OA 患者中的使用与心血管事件之间的关联。我们利用全国性的行政登记册,调查了 1996 年至 2015 年期间丹麦≥18 岁 OA 患者的 NSAIDs 使用情况。通过调整 Cox 比例风险分析,我们计算了 OA 诊断后 5 年内复合心血管死亡、非致死性心肌梗死和非致死性缺血性卒中和 TIA 结局以及每种结局的风险。在 533502 名患者中,64.3%接受了 NSAIDs 治疗,38226 名患者(7.2%)在随访期间发生了心血管事件。与未使用相比,所有 NSAIDs 均与复合结局的风险增加相关:罗非昔布的危险比(HR)为 1.90(95%置信区间,1.74-2.08);塞来昔布,1.47(1.34-1.62);双氯芬酸,1.44(1.36-1.54);布洛芬,1.20(1.15-1.25);和萘普生,1.20(1.04-1.39)。每个单独的结局也有类似的结果。当以塞来昔布为参考时,布洛芬(HRs:0.81 [CI:0.74-0.90])和萘普生(HRs:0.81 [0.68-0.97])显示出较低的心血管风险,即使与低剂量相比也是如此。与不使用 NSAIDs 相比,低剂量萘普生和布洛芬与复合结局的风险最低:HRs:1.12(1.07-1.19)和 1.16(0.92-1.42)。在 OA 患者中,我们发现 NSAIDs 之间的心血管风险存在显著差异。与塞来昔布相比,萘普生和布洛芬似乎更安全,即使我们检查等效的低剂量也是如此。就心血管安全性而言,在最低有效剂量下,萘普生和布洛芬可能是需要缓解疼痛的 OA 患者的首选一线药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验