• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响赫雷斯(西班牙)农村医院急诊科患者自行转诊的决定因素。

Determining factors for the increase in self-referrals to the Emergency Department of a rural hospital in Huelva (Spain).

机构信息

Intensive Medicine and Emergencies CMU, Riotinto Hospital, Huelva,Spain.

Economy Department, University of Huelva, Huelva,Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0207199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207199. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0207199
PMID:30485300
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6261549/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the increase of self-referral patients at the Emergency Department of Riotinto District Hospital (in Huelva, Spain) during a short period. The study focused on patients' profiles to identify key factors that explained the increase of self-referrals.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective descriptive study using patient's data from a hospital emergency department between 2003-2015, excluding the period 2012-14 due to the lack of records. Socio-demographic variables, type of referral, access to health services, hospital route, transfer time and organisational changes were analysed, among other factors. Descriptive statistics, chi-square test, and binary logistic regression analysis were used.

RESULTS

Self-referral patients to the hospital emergency department revealed a growing trend. Logistic regression model showed that the variables that best predict its occurrence were the health system changes from 2008 and the time it takes to get to the Extra-hospital Emergency Services, where those changes act as modifiers of the effect. From 2008, the likelihood of self-referral in towns with an Extra-hospital Emergency Service over 2 minutes away by car was of 76.43%. When including the triage level, the logistic regression model showed that 83.1% of patients referred themselves.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in the health system and in the time for patients to get to the reference hospital from their origin, affect the likelihood of self-referral to the emergency department. Once the patient's severity level was included, this variable, along with the time to get to the emergency department, modified the probability of self-referral to the emergency department. We found an increase in hospital services together with a reduction of resources in the primary care emergency system. This may have led to inefficiencies in the public health system, together with an increase in self-referrals and greater problems to service users.

摘要

目的

分析雷蒂罗区医院(位于西班牙韦尔瓦)急诊科在短时间内自我转诊患者增加的情况。该研究侧重于患者特征,以确定解释自我转诊增加的关键因素。

材料和方法

使用 2003-2015 年期间医院急诊部患者的数据进行回顾性描述性研究,由于记录缺失,排除了 2012-14 年期间的数据。分析了社会人口统计学变量、转诊类型、获得卫生服务的途径、医院途径、转诊时间和组织变化等因素。使用描述性统计、卡方检验和二元逻辑回归分析。

结果

医院急诊部自我转诊患者呈增长趋势。逻辑回归模型显示,预测其发生的最佳变量是 2008 年的卫生系统变化和到达医院外急诊服务的时间,这些变化是影响的修饰剂。自 2008 年以来,通过汽车前往外院急诊服务超过 2 分钟的城镇,自我转诊的可能性为 76.43%。当包括分诊级别时,逻辑回归模型显示 83.1%的患者自行转诊。

结论

卫生系统的变化和患者从原籍地到达参考医院的时间,影响了急诊部自我转诊的可能性。一旦包括患者的严重程度,除了到达急诊部的时间外,该变量还改变了急诊部自我转诊的概率。我们发现医院服务增加,而初级保健急诊系统的资源减少。这可能导致公共卫生系统效率低下,自我转诊增加,服务使用者面临更大的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4baf/6261549/2dce4701131e/pone.0207199.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4baf/6261549/f5c687758375/pone.0207199.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4baf/6261549/2dce4701131e/pone.0207199.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4baf/6261549/f5c687758375/pone.0207199.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4baf/6261549/2dce4701131e/pone.0207199.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Determining factors for the increase in self-referrals to the Emergency Department of a rural hospital in Huelva (Spain).影响赫雷斯(西班牙)农村医院急诊科患者自行转诊的决定因素。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0207199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207199. eCollection 2018.
2
Patient and care characteristics of self-referrals treated by the general practitioner cooperative at emergency-care-access-points in the Netherlands.荷兰全科医生合作社在急诊接入点治疗的自我转诊患者及护理特征。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 May 12;18(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0633-1.
3
What presents to a rural district emergency department: A case mix.农村地区急诊科就诊情况:病例组合分析。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2020 Jul 28;12(1):e1-e6. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2275.
4
[Qualitative approach to the increase for care demand on self-referral in a hospital emergency department.].[医院急诊科自我转诊护理需求增加的定性研究方法。]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2021 Jun 23;95:e202106087.
5
Emergency department referral patterns of Australian general practitioner registrars: a cross-sectional analysis of prevalence, nature and associations.澳大利亚全科医生注册实习生的急诊科转诊模式:患病率、性质及关联的横断面分析
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Feb;43(1):21-28. doi: 10.1071/AH17005.
6
Emergency department poisoning visits in children younger than 6 years: comparing referrals by a regional poison control center to referrals by other sources.6岁以下儿童急诊科中毒就诊情况:比较地区中毒控制中心的转诊与其他来源的转诊。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Dec;28(12):1343-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318276c07a.
7
Understanding the patient journey to the Emergency Department - A South Australian study.了解患者前往急诊科的就医过程——一项南澳大利亚的研究。
Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2015 May;18(2):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
8
Determinants of out-of-hours service users' potentially inappropriate referral or non-referral to an emergency department: a retrospective cohort study in a local health authority, Veneto Region, Italy.非工作时间服务使用者潜在不适当转诊至急诊科或不转诊的决定因素:意大利威尼托地区一个地方卫生当局的回顾性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 8;6(8):e011526. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011526.
9
Emergency Department Attendance after Telephone Triage: A Population-Based Data Linkage Study.急诊分诊后就诊情况:基于人群的资料链接研究。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):1137-1162. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12692. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
10
Referral patterns, delays, and equity in access to advanced paediatric emergency care in Vietnam.越南高级儿科急诊服务的转诊模式、延误情况和公平性。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Dec 15;16(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0703-y.

本文引用的文献

1
[On hospital emergency department crowding].[关于医院急诊科拥挤问题]
Emergencias. 2015;27(2):113-120.
2
Motives for self-referral to the emergency department: a systematic review of the literature.自我前往急诊科就诊的动机:文献系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec 9;16(1):685. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1935-z.
3
Self-referring patients at the emergency department: appropriateness of ED use and motives for self-referral.急诊科的自我转诊患者:急诊就诊的适宜性及自我转诊动机
Int J Emerg Med. 2014 Jul 16;7:28. doi: 10.1186/s12245-014-0028-1. eCollection 2014.
4
Access to general practice and visits to accident and emergency departments in England: cross-sectional analysis of a national patient survey.英格兰地区的全科医疗服务利用情况及急诊就诊情况:一项全国性患者调查的横断面分析
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Jul;64(624):e434-9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X680533.
5
[Use of emergency departments in rural and urban areas in Spain].[西班牙农村和城市地区急诊科的使用情况]
Semergen. 2015 Mar;41(2):63-9. doi: 10.1016/j.semerg.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
6
Access to primary care and visits to emergency departments in England: a cross-sectional, population-based study.英格兰的基本医疗服务可及性和急诊就诊情况:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 12;8(6):e66699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066699. Print 2013.
7
A regional survey to determine factors influencing patient choices in selecting a particular emergency department for care.一项区域性调查,旨在确定影响患者选择特定急诊科室进行治疗的因素。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;20(1):63-70. doi: 10.1111/acem.12063.
8
Emergency department visits for nonurgent conditions: systematic literature review.非紧急状况下的急诊科就诊:系统文献回顾。
Am J Manag Care. 2013 Jan;19(1):47-59.
9
Primary care access and its relationship with emergency department utilisation: an observational, cross-sectional, ecological study.基层医疗可及性及其与急诊科利用的关系:一项观察性、横断面、生态学研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Dec;61(593):e787-93. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X613124.
10
ED patients: how nonurgent are they? Systematic review of the emergency medicine literature.ED 患者:他们有多不急?急诊医学文献的系统评价。
Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Mar;29(3):333-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 Apr 24.