Suppr超能文献

非紧急状况下的急诊科就诊:系统文献回顾。

Emergency department visits for nonurgent conditions: systematic literature review.

机构信息

RAND Corporation, Arlington, VA 22202, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2013 Jan;19(1):47-59.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A large proportion of all emergency department (ED) visits in the United States are for nonurgent conditions. Use of the ED for nonurgent conditions may lead to excessive healthcare spending, unnecessary testing and treatment, and weaker patient-primary care provider relationships.

OBJECTIVES

To understand the factors influencing an individual's decision to visit an ED for a nonurgent condition.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review of the US literature. Multiple databases were searched for US studies published after 1990 that assessed factors associated with nonurgent ED use. Based on those results we developed a conceptual framework.

RESULTS

A total of 26 articles met inclusion criteria. No 2 articles used the same exact definition of nonurgent visits. Across the relevant articles, the average fraction of all ED visits that were judged to be nonurgent (whether prospectively at triage or retrospectively following ED evaluation) was 37% (range 8%-62%). Articles were heterogeneous with respect to study design, population, comparison group, and nonurgent definition. The limited evidence suggests that younger age, convenience of the ED compared with alternatives, referral to the ED by a physician, and negative perceptions about alternatives such as primary care providers all play a role in driving nonurgent ED use.

CONCLUSIONS

Our structured overview of the literature and conceptual framework can help to inform future research and the development of evidence-based interventions to reduce nonurgent ED use.

摘要

背景

在美国,相当大比例的急诊部(ED)就诊是为了非紧急情况。将 ED 用于非紧急情况可能会导致过度的医疗保健支出、不必要的检查和治疗,以及患者与初级保健提供者关系的减弱。

目的

了解影响个人因非紧急情况前往 ED 的决策因素。

方法

我们对美国文献进行了系统的文献回顾。 多个数据库搜索了 1990 年后评估与非紧急 ED 使用相关因素的美国研究。 根据这些结果,我们制定了一个概念框架。

结果

共有 26 篇文章符合纳入标准。 没有 2 篇文章使用完全相同的非紧急就诊定义。 在相关文章中,被判断为非紧急的所有 ED 就诊的平均比例(无论是在分诊时前瞻性地还是在 ED 评估后回顾性地)为 37%(范围为 8%-62%)。 文章在研究设计、人群、对照组和非紧急定义方面存在异质性。 有限的证据表明,年龄较小、与替代方案相比 ED 更方便、医生转介至 ED 以及对替代方案(如初级保健提供者)的负面看法都在推动非紧急 ED 使用方面发挥了作用。

结论

我们对文献的结构化概述和概念框架可以帮助为未来的研究和制定基于证据的干预措施提供信息,以减少非紧急 ED 的使用。

相似文献

9
Comprehensive care programmes for children with medical complexity.针对患有复杂疾病儿童的综合护理方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 30;5(5):CD013329. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013329.pub2.

引用本文的文献

5
Parent Preferences for Acute Respiratory Tract Infection Care.家长对急性呼吸道感染护理的偏好。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2525904. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.25904.
7
Artificial intelligence, health empowerment, and the general practitioner scheme.人工智能、健康赋权与全科医生计划。
Digit Health. 2025 Jul 29;11:20552076251365006. doi: 10.1177/20552076251365006. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
10
Exploring Factors That Drive Nonurgent Emergency Department Use.探索促使非紧急情况患者前往急诊科就诊的因素。
J Patient Exp. 2025 Jul 23;12:23743735251362529. doi: 10.1177/23743735251362529. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

2
Rethinking emergency department visits.重新审视急诊科就诊情况。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Oct-Dec;33(4):290-5. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181f53424.
10
Nonurgent use of the emergency department.急诊科的非紧急使用。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2008 Oct-Dec;31(4):370-6. doi: 10.1097/01.JAC.0000336555.54460.fe.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验