Parr Justin M, Chouhan Prem, Wagels Michael
Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Apr;89(4):E132-E136. doi: 10.1111/ans.14922. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
Free tissue reconstruction is reliable in suitable patients but patient selection remains a challenge for the reconstructive surgeon. The anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap and pedicled pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMF) are two common reconstructive options for a lateral temporal bone resection defect. The threshold at which free tissue reconstruction should be considered over locoregional reconstruction is not defined. We sought to define reconstructive flap choice in the setting of medical comorbidities that may dissuade free tissue transfer.
A retrospective analysis of lateral temporal bone defects at a single institution was undertaken. The primary outcomes were flap survival, surgical complications and durations of surgery and stay. Data regarding medical comorbidities and potential confounders were examined.
Sixty patients with lateral temporal bone defects were identified. Twenty-four (40%) patients underwent PMMF reconstruction and 36 (60%) were reconstructed with ALT. The former were significantly older (73 versus 62 years), though with similar Anesthesiologists Risk Classification System status. Free-flap reconstruction resulted in significantly less flap loss (two versus six) but a longer operating time (790 versus 671 min).
Patients suffering head and neck cancer with medical comorbidities can make selection of a suitable reconstruction difficult. We found that while patients undergoing ALT reconstruction were typically younger, the comorbidity profile of those patients was similar to patients undergoing PMMF reconstruction. ALT flaps were more reliable than the PMMF, lending credence to the view that free tissue transfer should be the preferred reconstructive option in suitable candidates and defects.
对于合适的患者,游离组织重建是可靠的,但患者选择仍然是重建外科医生面临的一项挑战。股前外侧(ALT)游离皮瓣和带蒂胸大肌肌皮瓣(PMMF)是颞骨外侧切除术后缺损的两种常见重建选择。在何种阈值下应优先考虑游离组织重建而非局部区域重建尚无定论。我们试图确定在存在可能阻碍游离组织移植的内科合并症情况下的重建皮瓣选择。
对单一机构的颞骨外侧缺损进行回顾性分析。主要结局指标为皮瓣存活情况、手术并发症以及手术时间和住院时间。对内科合并症和潜在混杂因素的数据进行了检查。
共确定60例颞骨外侧缺损患者。24例(40%)患者接受了PMMF重建,36例(60%)接受了ALT重建。前者年龄显著更大(73岁对62岁),尽管美国麻醉医师协会风险分级系统状态相似。游离皮瓣重建导致皮瓣丢失显著更少(2例对6例),但手术时间更长(790分钟对671分钟)。
患有内科合并症的头颈癌患者可能难以选择合适的重建方式。我们发现,虽然接受ALT重建的患者通常更年轻,但这些患者的合并症情况与接受PMMF重建的患者相似。ALT皮瓣比PMMF更可靠,这支持了在合适的候选患者和缺损情况下游离组织移植应作为首选重建方式的观点。