Jia Ni, Gu Guixiong, Zhao Lu, He Shousen, Xiong Fei, Chai Yuli, Quan Li, Hou Haiou, Dai Yaohua
Department of Early Child Development, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Soochow University, Jiangsu, China.
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2018;27(6):1294-1301. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.201811_27(6).0017.
To explore advantages and challenges for exclusive breastfeeding (EBF), compared to non-exclusive breastfeeding (nEBF).
Mothers from 7 cities in China were visited at 3, 10, 60, 120, and 180 days postpartum. Data about feeding practices, infant growth, and the macronutrient contents of human milk (HM) were collected.
130 lactating mothers attended 5 visits. 59 mothers (45.4%) exclusively breastfed infants for 0-4 month. Frequencies of breastfeeding per day were higher in the EBF group than the nEBF group at day 3, 10, 120 and 180, and were less than 8 times per day in the nEBF group. For Weight-for-age z scores, there were no differences between the two groups. Length-for-age z score was greater in the nEBF group at day 180 (0.74±1.05 vs 0.33±1.28). Weight-for-length z scores were greater in the EBF group at day 120 and 180 (day 120: 0.88±1.08 vs 0.36±1.1, day 180: 1.1±0.94 vs 0.54±1.07). The average protein and lactose contents of HM in the nEBF group were higher than in the EBF group at day 10.
For nEBF infants, intake of formula replaced intake of breastmilk, due to lack of breastfeeding frequency, which did not bring weight gain for nEBF infants. During the introduction of complementary foods, EBF infants needed complementary nutrients to support growth. Therefore, lactating mothers may need to provide appropriate complementary feeding and maternal leave extension to attend to their infant's nutritional requirements. The criteria for linear growth may also need to be more commensurate with breastfeeding and relevant to later health outcomes.
探讨纯母乳喂养(EBF)相较于非纯母乳喂养(nEBF)的优势与挑战。
对来自中国7个城市的母亲在产后3天、10天、60天、120天和180天进行访视。收集有关喂养方式、婴儿生长情况以及母乳(HM)中常量营养素含量的数据。
130名哺乳期母亲参加了5次访视。59名母亲(45.4%)纯母乳喂养婴儿0至4个月。在第3天、10天、120天和180天,EBF组每天的母乳喂养频率高于nEBF组,且nEBF组每天的母乳喂养频率低于8次。对于年龄别体重Z评分,两组之间没有差异。在第180天,nEBF组的年龄别身长Z评分更高(0.74±1.05对0.33±1.28)。在第120天和180天,EBF组的身长别体重Z评分更高(第120天:0.88±1.08对0.36±1.1,第180天:1.1±0.94对0.54±1.07)。在第10天,nEBF组母乳中的平均蛋白质和乳糖含量高于EBF组。
对于nEBF婴儿,由于母乳喂养频率不足,配方奶的摄入替代了母乳的摄入,这并未给nEBF婴儿带来体重增加。在引入辅食期间,EBF婴儿需要补充营养以支持生长。因此,哺乳期母亲可能需要提供适当的辅食喂养并延长产假,以满足婴儿的营养需求。线性生长的标准也可能需要更符合母乳喂养情况并与后期健康结果相关。