Dept of Respiratory Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK.
Eur Respir J. 2019 Jan 3;53(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00869-2018. Print 2019 Jan.
The aim of this study was to compare radiology-based prediction models in rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease (RAILD) to identify patients with a progressive fibrosis phenotype.RAILD patients had computed tomography (CT) scans scored visually and using CALIPER and forced vital capacity (FVC) measurements. Outcomes were evaluated using three techniques, as follows. 1) Scleroderma system evaluating visual interstitial lung disease extent and FVC values; 2) Fleischner Society idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) diagnostic guidelines applied to RAILD; and 3) CALIPER scores of vessel-related structures (VRS). Outcomes were compared to IPF patients.On univariable Cox analysis, all three staging systems strongly predicted outcome (scleroderma system hazard ratio (HR) 3.78, p=9×10; Fleischner system HR 1.98, p=2×10; and 4.4% VRS threshold HR 3.10, p=4×10). When the scleroderma and Fleischner systems were combined, termed the progressive fibrotic system (C-statistic 0.71), they identified a patient subset (n=36) with a progressive fibrotic phenotype and similar 4-year survival to IPF. On multivariable analysis, with adjustment for patient age, sex and smoking status, when analysed alongside the progressive fibrotic system, the VRS threshold of 4.4% independently predicted outcome (model C-statistic 0.77).The combination of two visual CT-based staging systems identified 23% of an RAILD cohort with an IPF-like progressive fibrotic phenotype. The addition of a computer-derived VRS threshold further improved outcome prediction and model fit, beyond that encompassed by RAILD measures of disease severity and extent.
本研究旨在比较基于影像学的类风湿关节炎相关间质性肺疾病(RAILD)预测模型,以识别具有进行性纤维化表型的患者。RAILD 患者的计算机断层扫描(CT)进行了视觉评分,并使用 CALIPER 和用力肺活量(FVC)测量。使用以下三种技术评估结果,如下所述。1)硬皮病系统评估视觉间质性肺疾病程度和 FVC 值;2)Fleischner 协会特发性肺纤维化(IPF)诊断指南应用于 RAILD;3)CALIPER 血管相关结构(VRS)评分。将结果与 IPF 患者进行比较。在单变量 Cox 分析中,所有三种分期系统均强烈预测结果(硬皮病系统风险比(HR)3.78,p=9×10;Fleischner 系统 HR 1.98,p=2×10;4.4%VRS 阈值 HR 3.10,p=4×10)。当硬皮病和 Fleischner 系统相结合时,称为进行性纤维化系统(C 统计量为 0.71),它们确定了一个具有进行性纤维化表型的患者亚组(n=36),与 IPF 相似的 4 年生存率。多变量分析中,在调整患者年龄、性别和吸烟状况后,与进行性纤维化系统一起分析时,4.4%VRS 阈值独立预测结果(模型 C 统计量为 0.77)。两个基于 CT 的视觉分期系统的结合确定了 RAILD 队列中有 23%的患者具有类似 IPF 的进行性纤维化表型。计算机衍生的 VRS 阈值的加入进一步提高了预后预测和模型拟合,超出了 RAILD 疾病严重程度和程度的测量范围。