• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意排斥效应与相对大小判断

The attentional repulsion effect and relative size judgments.

作者信息

Fortenbaugh Francesca C, Sugarman Alexander, Robertson Lynn C, Esterman Michael

机构信息

GRECC & Research Services, Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Feb;81(2):442-461. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1612-x.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-018-1612-x
PMID:30488191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6760903/
Abstract

Rapid shifts of involuntary attention have been shown to induce mislocalizations of nearby objects. One pattern of mislocalization, termed the Attentional Repulsion Effect (ARE), occurs when the onset of peripheral pre-cues lead to perceived shifts of subsequently presented stimuli away from the cued location. While the standard ARE configuration utilizes vernier lines, to date, all previous ARE studies have only assessed distortions along one direction and tested one spatial dimension (i.e., position or shape). The present study assessed the magnitude of the ARE using a novel stimulus configuration. Across three experiments participants judged which of two rectangles on the left or right side of the display appeared wider or taller. Pre-cues were used in Experiments 1 and 2. Results show equivalent perceived expansions in the width and height of the pre-cued rectangle in addition to baseline asymmetries in left/right relative size under no-cue conditions. Altering cue locations led to shifts in the perceived location of the same rectangles, demonstrating distortions in perceived shape and location using the same stimuli and cues. Experiment 3 demonstrates that rectangles are perceived as larger in the periphery compared to fixation, suggesting that eye movements cannot account for results from Experiments 1 and 2. The results support the hypothesis that the ARE reflects a localized, symmetrical warping of visual space that impacts multiple aspects of spatial and object perception.

摘要

非自愿注意力的快速转移已被证明会导致附近物体的定位错误。一种定位错误模式,称为注意力排斥效应(ARE),当外周预线索的出现导致随后呈现的刺激从线索位置被感知到偏移时就会发生。虽然标准的ARE配置使用游标线,但迄今为止,之前所有的ARE研究都只评估了沿一个方向的扭曲,并测试了一个空间维度(即位置或形状)。本研究使用一种新颖的刺激配置评估了ARE的大小。在三个实验中,参与者判断显示屏左侧或右侧的两个矩形中哪一个看起来更宽或更高。实验1和2中使用了预线索。结果显示,除了在无线索条件下左右相对大小的基线不对称外,预线索矩形的宽度和高度也有同等程度的感知扩展。改变线索位置会导致相同矩形的感知位置发生偏移,这表明使用相同的刺激和线索时,感知形状和位置会出现扭曲。实验3表明,与注视点相比,周边的矩形被感知为更大,这表明眼球运动不能解释实验1和2的结果。这些结果支持了这样一种假设,即ARE反映了视觉空间的局部对称扭曲,这种扭曲会影响空间和物体感知的多个方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1200/6760903/af8061ca109e/nihms-1013176-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1200/6760903/b90789e90538/nihms-1013176-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1200/6760903/b4a0f0dd9607/nihms-1013176-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1200/6760903/ff5ea83d7a28/nihms-1013176-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1200/6760903/085f031209ec/nihms-1013176-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1200/6760903/1664768da9dc/nihms-1013176-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1200/6760903/01c2462185f1/nihms-1013176-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1200/6760903/a731168d9720/nihms-1013176-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1200/6760903/af8061ca109e/nihms-1013176-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1200/6760903/b90789e90538/nihms-1013176-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1200/6760903/b4a0f0dd9607/nihms-1013176-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1200/6760903/ff5ea83d7a28/nihms-1013176-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1200/6760903/085f031209ec/nihms-1013176-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1200/6760903/1664768da9dc/nihms-1013176-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1200/6760903/01c2462185f1/nihms-1013176-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1200/6760903/a731168d9720/nihms-1013176-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1200/6760903/af8061ca109e/nihms-1013176-f0008.jpg

相似文献

1
The attentional repulsion effect and relative size judgments.注意排斥效应与相对大小判断
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Feb;81(2):442-461. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1612-x.
2
Depth modulation of the attentional repulsion effect.注意排斥效应的深度调制。
Perception. 2013;42(12):1333-43. doi: 10.1068/p7580.
3
Where does attention go when it moves? Spatial properties and locus of the attentional repulsion effect.注意力转移时会去往何处?注意力排斥效应的空间特性与位置
J Vis. 2010 Oct 27;10(12):33. doi: 10.1167/10.12.33.
4
Object-based attention in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)基于客体的注意
Vision Res. 2010 Mar 17;50(6):577-84. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 Jan 10.
5
Mislocalization of visual stimuli: independent effects of static and dynamic attention.视觉刺激的错位:静态和动态注意的独立影响。
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028371. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
6
Attentional repulsion effects produced by feature-guided shifts of attention.由注意力的特征引导转移产生的注意力排斥效应。
J Vis. 2020 Mar 17;20(3):10. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.3.10.
7
Multiple perceptual distortions and their modulation in leftsided visual neglect.左侧视觉忽视中的多种知觉扭曲及其调节
Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(7):1073-86. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00140-2.
8
Temporal course of position shift for a peripheral target.外周目标位置偏移的时间进程。
J Vis. 2011 May 11;11(6):6. doi: 10.1167/11.6.6.
9
Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.跨感觉模式的自愿和刺激驱动的空间注意机制之间的相互作用。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Dec;21(12):2384-97. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21178.
10
Inhibition of return shortens perceived duration of a brief visual event.返回抑制缩短了短暂视觉事件的感知持续时间。
Vision Res. 2016 Nov;128:39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Perception of the non-dominant hand as larger after non-judgmental focus on its details.非评判性地关注非主导手的细节后,会感觉该手更大。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 19;12(1):15670. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19919-6.
2
Attentional Capture from Looming Alters Perception.来自逼近的注意力捕获会改变感知。
Vis cogn. 2021 Jan 17;29(2):118-124. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2021.1874583.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in the distribution of sustained attention alter the perceived structure of visual space.持续注意力分布的变化会改变视觉空间的感知结构。
Vision Res. 2017 Feb;131:26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
2
The Perceived Size and Shape of Objects in Peripheral Vision.周边视觉中物体的感知大小和形状。
Iperception. 2016 Aug 17;7(4):2041669516661900. doi: 10.1177/2041669516661900. eCollection 2016 Jul-Aug.
3
Vision, Perception, and Attention through the Lens of Microsaccades: Mechanisms and Implications.
通过微眼跳视角看视觉、感知与注意力:机制及影响
Front Syst Neurosci. 2015 Dec 2;9:167. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00167. eCollection 2015.
4
Spatial distortions in localization and midline estimation in hemianopia and normal vision.偏盲和正常视力中定位及中线估计的空间扭曲
Vision Res. 2015 Jun;111(Pt A):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.022. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
5
Individual differences in visual field shape modulate the effects of attention on the lower visual field advantage in crowding.视野形状的个体差异调节了注意力对拥挤状态下下视野优势的影响。
J Vis. 2015 Feb 12;15(2):19. doi: 10.1167/15.2.19.
6
Spontaneous microsaccades reflect shifts in covert attention.自发性微扫视反映了隐蔽注意力的转移。
J Neurosci. 2014 Oct 8;34(41):13693-700. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0582-14.2014.
7
Spatial attention: differential shifts in pseudoneglect direction with time-on-task and initial bias support the idea of observer subtypes.空间注意:随着任务时间和初始偏差的增加,假性忽视方向的差异转移支持了观察者亚型的观点。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Nov;51(13):2747-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.030. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
8
Alteration of visual perception prior to microsaccades.微扫视前视觉感知的改变。
Neuron. 2013 Feb 20;77(4):775-86. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.014.
9
Attentional enhancement of spatial resolution: linking behavioural and neurophysiological evidence.注意增强空间分辨率:连接行为和神经生理学证据。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 Mar;14(3):188-200. doi: 10.1038/nrn3443.
10
Representational pseudoneglect in line bisection.代表性的线段二等分忽视。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):879-83. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0285-z.