Monahan Ken, Coffin Samuel, Lawson Mark, Saliba Linda, Rutherford Ray, Brittain Evan
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Echocardiography. 2019 Jan;36(1):119-124. doi: 10.1111/echo.14209. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
The degree of correlation of pulmonary transit time (PTT) between contrast echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) across the spectrum of cardiac disease has not been quantified. In addition, the degree to which PTT estimates are affected by variation in location and size of regions of interest (ROI) is unknown.
Pulmonary transit time was obtained using an inflection point technique from individuals that underwent contrast echocardiography and cardiac MRI. Right ventricular, left atrial, and left ventricular ROIs were evaluated, and two sizes for each ROI were used. The Spearman correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis were used for comparisons between modalities. Bland-Altman plots were also used to measure the impact of ROI size and location on transit times.
Fourteen participants (age: 27-64 years; LV ejection fraction: 30%-60%) underwent both studies a median of 1 week apart. The correlation between modalities was significant for PTT (r = 0.65; P = 0.01) and normalized PTT (r = 0.80; P = 0.001). Cardiac MRI yielded transit times consistently higher than contrast echocardiography (bias ~ 1.4 seconds), but the discordance was not dependent on transit time magnitude. Low bias was observed for comparisons of ROI size and location (<0.5 seconds).
Contrast echocardiography underestimates transit time measurements obtained by cardiac MRI, although the discrepancy was systematic and may have been contributed to by the interval between imaging studies. ROI location and size did not impact transit time values, suggesting that ROIs could be placed without intensive training, a step toward incorporation of real-time PTT measurement into echocardiographic laboratory workflow.
在整个心脏病谱中,对比超声心动图与心脏磁共振成像(MRI)之间肺循环时间(PTT)的相关程度尚未得到量化。此外,感兴趣区域(ROI)的位置和大小变化对PTT估计值的影响程度尚不清楚。
采用拐点技术从接受对比超声心动图和心脏MRI检查的个体中获取肺循环时间。对右心室、左心房和左心室ROI进行评估,并为每个ROI使用两种大小。使用Spearman相关系数和Bland-Altman分析进行不同检查方法之间的比较。Bland-Altman图也用于测量ROI大小和位置对循环时间的影响。
14名参与者(年龄:27 - 64岁;左心室射血分数:30% - 60%)接受了这两项检查,两项检查的间隔时间中位数为1周。不同检查方法之间的相关性在PTT方面显著(r = 0.65;P = 0.01),在标准化PTT方面也显著(r = 0.80;P = 0.001)。心脏MRI得出的循环时间始终高于对比超声心动图(偏差约1.4秒),但这种不一致并不取决于循环时间的大小。在比较ROI大小和位置时观察到低偏差(<0.5秒)。
对比超声心动图低估了心脏MRI获得的循环时间测量值,尽管这种差异是系统性的,可能是由于成像检查之间的时间间隔所致。ROI的位置和大小并未影响循环时间值,这表明放置ROI无需强化训练,这是朝着将实时PTT测量纳入超声心动图实验室工作流程迈出的一步。