Çini Nilsu, Umay Cenk, Özdemir Okan, Çetin İlknur Alsan, Epik Hakan, Demiral Ayşe Nur
Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. Lütfi Kırdar Kartal Training and Research State Hospital, Kartal, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Dokuz Eylül University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey.
J Cancer Res Ther. 2018 Oct-Dec;14(6):1389-1396. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.193108.
Dosimetric comparison of three different techniques in female lymphoma patients who had radiotherapy (RT) to the neck and mediastinum.
Retrospective clinical study.
Computerized tomography-simulator images of eight patients were obtained retrospectively. Using 6 MV-X photon energy, RT plans were formed with three different techniques (anterior posterior-posterior anterior 2-field three-dimensional conformal RT [AP-PA 2-field 3D-CRT], 4-field 3D-CRT and "forward" plan intensity modulated RT [FPIMRT]). Comparisons were in terms of homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), and inhomogeneity coefficient for planning target volume (PTV); mean lung dose, V, V, V, V for lung; D, V, V, V for heart; D, V, V, V for breast; D for spine; D, V, V, V, V for thyroid.
Since nonparametric tests had to be used due to the study population being < 30, Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were implemented in trilateral and bilateral comparison of techniques, respectively. For statistical significance, P value was required to be <0.05.
When FPIMRT was compared with AP-PA and 4-field techniques with respect to, HI (AP-PA/FPIMRT P: 0.017; 4-field/FPIMRT P: 0.03) and CI (AP-PA/FPIMRT P: 0.018; 4-field/FPIMRT P: 0.042), FPIMRT was more advantageous. In addition, FPIMRT was found more useful in terms of D (AP-PA/FPIMRT P: 0.012; 4-Field/FPIMRT P: 0.012) for spinal cord and D (AP-PA/FPIMRT P: 0.012; 4-field/FPIMRT P: 0.012) for thyroid.
FPIMRT was superior in terms of PTV homogeneity and conformity. However, it was observed that for normal tissues, FPIMRT was advantageous only for spinal cord and thyroid; but it was not the most advantageous technique for some of the dose-volume parameters of the breast, lung, and heart.
对接受颈部和纵隔放疗的女性淋巴瘤患者的三种不同技术进行剂量学比较。
回顾性临床研究。
回顾性获取8例患者的计算机断层扫描模拟图像。使用6兆伏-X光子能量,采用三种不同技术(前后-后前两野三维适形放疗[AP-PA两野3D-CRT]、四野3D-CRT和“正向”计划调强放疗[FPIMRT])制定放疗计划。比较内容包括均匀性指数(HI)、适形指数(CI)以及计划靶区(PTV)的不均匀系数;肺的平均剂量、V、V、V、V;心脏的D、V、V、V;乳腺的D、V、V、V;脊髓的D;甲状腺的D、V、V、V、V。
由于研究人群小于30例,必须使用非参数检验,在技术的三边和双边比较中分别实施Friedman检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验。为具有统计学意义,要求P值小于0.05。
当将FPIMRT与AP-PA和四野技术在HI(AP-PA/FPIMRT P:0.017;四野/FPIMRT P:0.03)和CI(AP-PA/FPIMRT P:0.018;四野/FPIMRT P:0.042)方面进行比较时,FPIMRT更具优势。此外,发现FPIMRT在脊髓的D(AP-PA/FPIMRT P:0.012;四野/FPIMRT P:0.012)和甲状腺的D(AP-PA/FPIMRT P:0.012;四野/FPIMRT P:0.012)方面更有用。
FPIMRT在PTV均匀性和适形性方面更具优势。然而,观察到对于正常组织,FPIMRT仅在脊髓和甲状腺方面具有优势;但对于乳腺、肺和心脏的一些剂量-体积参数,它并非最具优势的技术。