• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高紧急优先级肝移植患者的结局:我们做的对吗?

Outcome of Liver Transplant Patients With High Urgent Priority: Are We Doing the Right Thing?

机构信息

Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2019 Jun;103(6):1181-1190. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002526.

DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000002526
PMID:30489481
Abstract

BACKGROUND

About 15% of liver transplantations (LTs) in Eurotransplant are currently performed in patients with a high-urgency (HU) status. Patients who have acute liver failure (ALF) or require an acute retransplantation can apply for this status. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of this prioritization.

METHODS

Patients who were listed for LT with HU status from January 1, 2007, up to December 31, 2015, were included. Waiting list and posttransplantation outcomes were evaluated and compared with a reference group of patients with laboratory Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (labMELD) scores ≥40 (MELD 40+).

RESULTS

In the study period, 2299 HU patients were listed for LT. Ten days after listing, 72% of all HU patients were transplanted and 14% of patients deceased. Patients with HU status for primary ALF showed better patient survival at 3 years (69%) when compared with patients in the MELD 40+ group (57%). HU patients with labMELD ≥45 and patients with HU status for acute retransplantation and labMELD ≥35 have significantly inferior survival at 3-year follow-up of 46% and 42%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Current prioritization for patients with ALF is highly effective in preventing mortality on the waiting list. Although patients with HU status for ALF have good outcomes, survival is significantly inferior for patients with a high MELD score or for retransplantations. With the current scarcity of livers in mind, we should discuss whether potential recipients for a second or even third retransplantation should still receive absolute priority, with HU status, over other recipients with an expected, substantially better prognosis after transplantation.

摘要

背景

在 Eurotransplant 进行的大约 15%的肝移植(LT)目前用于高紧急(HU)状态的患者。患有急性肝衰竭(ALF)或需要急性再次移植的患者可以申请此状态。本研究旨在评估这种优先级排序的效果。

方法

从 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日,将列入 LT 清单并具有 HU 状态的患者纳入研究。评估等待名单和移植后结果,并与实验室终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分(labMELD)≥40 分(MELD40+)的参考组患者进行比较。

结果

在研究期间,2299 名 HU 患者被列入 LT 清单。列入清单后 10 天,72%的所有 HU 患者接受了移植,14%的患者死亡。HU 状态为原发性 ALF 的患者在 3 年时的患者生存率(69%)明显优于 MELD40+组(57%)。HU 状态为 labMELD≥45 且 HU 状态为急性再次移植且 labMELD≥35 的患者在 3 年随访中生存率分别为 46%和 42%,明显较差。

结论

目前针对 ALF 患者的优先级排序在防止等待名单上的死亡率方面非常有效。尽管 HU 状态为 ALF 的患者的结果较好,但对于 MELD 评分较高的患者或再次移植的患者,生存率明显较差。考虑到目前肝脏短缺的情况,我们应该讨论是否应该仍然给予具有潜在接受第二次甚至第三次再次移植的患者绝对优先级,而 HU 状态使其在移植后具有明显更好的预后的其他接受者优先。

相似文献

1
Outcome of Liver Transplant Patients With High Urgent Priority: Are We Doing the Right Thing?高紧急优先级肝移植患者的结局:我们做的对吗?
Transplantation. 2019 Jun;103(6):1181-1190. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002526.
2
End-stage liver disease candidates at the highest model for end-stage liver disease scores have higher wait-list mortality than status-1A candidates.终末期肝病模型评分最高的候选者比状态 1A 候选者的等待名单死亡率更高。
Hepatology. 2012 Jan;55(1):192-8. doi: 10.1002/hep.24632. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
3
Liver transplantation in adults with acute liver failure: Outcomes from the Argentinean Transplant Registry.成人急性肝衰竭肝移植:来自阿根廷移植登记处的结果。
Ann Hepatol. 2019 Mar-Apr;18(2):338-344. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2018.11.003. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
4
Analysis of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score in a liver transplantation waiting list.肝移植等待名单中终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分分析
Transplant Proc. 2007 Oct;39(8):2511-3. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.07.023.
5
Mortality Analysis of Acute Liver Failure in Uruguay.乌拉圭急性肝衰竭的死亡率分析。
Transplant Proc. 2018 Mar;50(2):465-471. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.12.037.
6
Patients with acute liver failure listed for superurgent liver transplantation in France: reevaluation of the Clichy-Villejuif criteria.法国拟行超急诊肝移植的急性肝衰竭患者:克利希-维利若标准的再评估。
Liver Transpl. 2015 Apr;21(4):512-23. doi: 10.1002/lt.24092.
7
Prioritization for liver transplantation using the MELD score in Chile: Inequities generated by MELD exceptions.: A collaboration between the Chilean Liver Transplant Programs, the Public Health Institute and the National Transplant Coordinator.智利使用 MELD 评分进行肝移植的优先排序:MELD 例外产生的不公平:智利肝移植计划、公共卫生研究所和国家移植协调员之间的合作。
Ann Hepatol. 2019 Mar-Apr;18(2):325-330. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2018.11.001. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
8
Prevalence, Severity, and Impact of Renal Dysfunction in Acute Liver Failure on the US Liver Transplant Waiting List.美国肝移植等待名单上急性肝衰竭患者肾功能不全的患病率、严重程度及影响
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Jan;61(1):309-16. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3870-y. Epub 2015 Sep 19.
9
Outcomes for liver transplant candidates listed with low model for end-stage liver disease score.终末期肝病模型评分低的肝移植候选者的结局
Liver Transpl. 2015 Nov;21(11):1403-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.24307.
10
Analysis of the Liver Transplant Waiting List in Our Center.我们中心肝移植等待名单分析。
Transplant Proc. 2019 Sep;51(7):2413-2415. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.192.

引用本文的文献

1
'Fulminant hepatic failure' anesthesiologic considerations.暴发性肝衰竭的麻醉学考量
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2025 Aug 1;38(4):503-512. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001530. Epub 2025 May 26.
2
The BAR Score Predicts and Stratifies Outcomes Following Liver Retransplantation: Insights From a Retrospective Cohort Study.BAR 评分可预测和分层肝移植后结局:来自回顾性队列研究的见解。
Transpl Int. 2024 Jan 16;37:12104. doi: 10.3389/ti.2024.12104. eCollection 2024.
3
Invasive Fungal Infections: The Early Killer after Liver Transplantation.
侵袭性真菌感染:肝移植后的早期杀手
J Fungi (Basel). 2023 Jun 12;9(6):655. doi: 10.3390/jof9060655.
4
Liver transplantation for iatrogenic injuries secondary to cholecystectomy: a systematic review.胆囊切除术所致医源性损伤的肝移植:系统评价。
Int J Surg. 2023 Jul 1;109(7):2120-2128. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000430.
5
Results of Liver Retransplantation After Rescue Hepatectomy: A Single-Center Study.肝移植术后挽救性肝切除的结果:一项单中心研究。
Ann Transplant. 2023 Jun 6;28:e939557. doi: 10.12659/AOT.939557.
6
Predictors of Survival After Liver Transplantation in Patients With the Highest Acuity (MELD ≥40).最高紧急程度(MELD≥40)患者肝移植后的生存率预测因素。
Ann Surg. 2020 Sep 1;272(3):458-466. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004211.
7
Selection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients for Liver Transplantation: Should the Threshold for Expected Oncological Survival Be Lowered?肝细胞癌患者肝移植的选择:预期肿瘤学生存的阈值是否应降低?
Transplant Direct. 2019 May 29;5(6):e459. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000904. eCollection 2019 Jun.