• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

是否到了从国家创伤数据库(National Trauma Data Bank)衡量并发症的时候了?近期报告趋势的纵向分析。

Is it time to measure complications from the National Trauma Data Bank? A longitudinal analysis of recent reporting trends.

机构信息

From the Department of Surgery (A.J.R., A.S.C., R.A.C.), San Francisco General Hospital; University of California (A.J.R., A.S.C., R.A.C.), San Francisco, California; Department of Surgery (M.J.C.), Denver Health Medical Center; and University of Colorado (M.J.C.), Denver, Colorado.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Feb;86(2):282-288. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002133.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000002133
PMID:30489507
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7269193/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Payers have approached select complications as never events, yet there is rationale that achieving a zero incidence of these events is impractical. Prior 2005 National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) analysis showed high rates (37%) of centers reporting no complications data making national estimates for determining standardized complication rates difficult to ascertain.

METHODS

The 2008-2012 NTDB National Sample Program nationally weighted files were used to calculate yearly national estimates. Rates were compared in all centers and those reporting complications data. Hospital characteristics were compared using Student t test. In 2011, an other complication category was introduced; overall rates were calculated with and without this category. Yearly estimates were reported for patients receiving care within centers reporting complications data.

RESULTS

From 2008-2012 NTDB, there were raw data on 3,657,884 patients. A total of 594,894 patients (16.3%) experienced one or more complications (82.7% one complication; 17.3% two or more complications). Excluding the other complication category, the overall weighted rate was 8.4% to 9.2%. Pneumonia was the most common complication (2.7-3.0%), occurring at twice the 2005 rate. The number of centers reporting no complications data dropped to 8.1% in 2011 (2008, 14.5%; 2009, 18.2%; 2010, 15.9%; 2012, 8.9%). By 2012, nearly all level I centers reported complications, whereas 46.4% of level IVs reported none (I 0.5%, II 2.7%, III 8.5%, p = 0.04). Data were reported the least frequently in nonteaching hospitals (15.8%, p = 0.007), those in the South (19.6%, p = 0.007), and those with less than 200 beds (23.6%, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Overall rates of complications from 2008 to 2012 were nearly twofold higher than 2005 data. Reporting has increased, and NTDB may provide a valuable platform for establishing rational and achievable measures for specific complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and epidemiological, level IV.

摘要

背景

支付方已将某些并发症视为永不发生事件,但也有合理的理由表明,实现这些事件的零发生率是不切实际的。在 2005 年之前的国家创伤数据库(NTDB)分析中,有 37%的中心报告没有并发症数据,这使得确定标准化并发症发生率的全国估计值变得困难。

方法

使用 2008-2012 年 NTDB 国家样本计划全国加权文件计算每年的全国估计值。在所有中心和报告并发症数据的中心比较了比率。使用学生 t 检验比较医院特征。2011 年引入了另一个并发症类别;计算时包括和不包括该类别,计算了总体比率。报告了在报告并发症数据的中心接受治疗的患者的年度估计值。

结果

2008-2012 年 NTDB 有 3657884 名患者的原始数据。共有 594894 名患者(16.3%)经历了一种或多种并发症(82.7%一种并发症;17.3%两种或多种并发症)。不包括其他并发症类别,总体加权率为 8.4%至 9.2%。肺炎是最常见的并发症(2.7-3.0%),发生率是 2005 年的两倍。报告无并发症数据的中心数量从 2008 年的 14.5%降至 2011 年的 8.1%(2009 年为 18.2%;2010 年为 15.9%;2012 年为 8.9%)。到 2012 年,几乎所有一级中心都报告了并发症,而 46.4%的四级中心则没有报告(一级为 0.5%,二级为 2.7%,三级为 8.5%,p=0.04)。非教学医院报告数据的频率最低(15.8%,p=0.007),南方医院报告数据的频率最低(19.6%,p=0.007),床位少于 200 张的医院报告数据的频率最低(23.6%,p=0.005)。

结论

2008 年至 2012 年的并发症总发生率几乎是 2005 年数据的两倍。报告有所增加,NTDB 可能为确定特定并发症的合理和可实现措施提供有价值的平台。

证据水平

预后和流行病学,IV 级。

相似文献

1
Is it time to measure complications from the National Trauma Data Bank? A longitudinal analysis of recent reporting trends.是否到了从国家创伤数据库(National Trauma Data Bank)衡量并发症的时候了?近期报告趋势的纵向分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Feb;86(2):282-288. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002133.
2
Hazards of benchmarking complications with the National Trauma Data Bank: numerators in search of denominators.将并发症与国家创伤数据库进行基准对比的风险:寻找分母的分子
J Trauma. 2008 Feb;64(2):273-7; discussion 277-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31816335ae.
3
Creating a nationally representative sample of patients from trauma centers.从创伤中心创建一个具有全国代表性的患者样本。
J Trauma. 2009 Sep;67(3):637-42; discussion 642-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b84294.
4
Failure to rescue as a center-level metric in pediatric trauma.未能抢救作为儿科创伤的中级指标。
Surgery. 2019 Jun;165(6):1116-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 May 7.
5
Facility disparities in reporting comorbidities to the National Trauma Data Bank.医疗机构在向国家创伤数据库报告合并症方面的差异。
Am J Surg. 2018 Sep;216(3):401-406. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.01.031. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
6
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Trauma Patients: Different Criteria, Different Rates.创伤患者的呼吸机相关性肺炎:不同标准,不同发生率。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Jun;17(3):363-8. doi: 10.1089/sur.2014.076. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
7
Injury mechanism, epidemiology, and Hospital trends of scapula fractures: A 10-year retrospective study of the National Trauma Data Bank.肩胛骨骨折的损伤机制、流行病学及医院趋势:一项对国家创伤数据库的10年回顾性研究
Injury. 2019 Feb;50(2):376-381. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.01.017. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
8
Practice Variation in Vena Cava Filter Use Among Trauma Centers in the National Trauma Database.国家创伤数据库中创伤中心之间腔静脉滤器使用的实践差异。
J Surg Res. 2020 Feb;246:145-152. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.09.004. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
9
Detecting the blind spot: complications in the trauma registry and trauma quality improvement.发现盲点:创伤登记与创伤质量改进中的并发症
Surgery. 2007 Oct;142(4):439-48; discussion 448-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.07.002.
10
NTDB™ data points. The National Sample Project: a new application of the NTDB.国家创伤数据库(NTDB™)数据点。国家样本项目:NTDB的一种新应用。
Bull Am Coll Surg. 2006 Feb;91(2):44.

引用本文的文献

1
Frailty independently predicts unfavorable discharge in non-operative traumatic brain injury: A retrospective single-institution cohort study.衰弱独立预测非手术性创伤性脑损伤患者不良出院结局:一项回顾性单机构队列研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 7;17(10):e0275677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275677. eCollection 2022.
2
Pediatric trauma venous thromboembolism prediction algorithm outperforms current anticoagulation prophylaxis guidelines: a pilot study.儿科创伤静脉血栓栓塞预测算法优于当前抗凝预防指南:一项试点研究。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2020 Mar;36(3):373-381. doi: 10.1007/s00383-019-04613-y. Epub 2020 Jan 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults - United States, 2005-2015.当前美国成年人吸烟状况 - 2005-2015 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Nov 11;65(44):1205-1211. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6544a2.
2
Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2017 Rates; Quality Reporting Requirements for Specific Providers; Graduate Medical Education; Hospital Notification Procedures Applicable to Beneficiaries Receiving Observation Services; Technical Changes Relating to Costs to Organizations and Medicare Cost Reports; Finalization of Interim Final Rules With Comment Period on LTCH PPS Payments for Severe Wounds, Modifications of Limitations on Redesignation by the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board, and Extensions of Payments to MDHs and Low-Volume Hospitals. Final rule.医疗保险计划;急性护理医院的住院病人前瞻性支付系统以及长期护理医院前瞻性支付系统和政策变更与2017财年费率;特定提供者的质量报告要求;毕业后医学教育;适用于接受观察服务受益人的医院通知程序;与组织成本和医疗保险成本报告相关的技术变更;关于严重伤口长期护理医院前瞻性支付系统支付的暂行最终规则征求意见稿的最终确定、医疗保险地理分类审查委员会重新指定限制的修改以及向临界接入医院和低容量医院的支付延期。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2016 Aug 22;81(162):56761-7345.
3
Estimated Lifetime Medical and Work-Loss Costs of Emergency Department-Treated Nonfatal Injuries--United States, 2013.2013 年美国急诊治疗非致命性损伤的预期终身医疗和工作损失成本。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Oct 2;64(38):1078-82. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6438a5.
4
Estimated Lifetime Medical and Work-Loss Costs of Fatal Injuries--United States, 2013.2013 年美国致命伤害的终生医疗和工作损失成本估算。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Oct 2;64(38):1074-7. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6438a4.
5
Benchmarking trauma centers on mortality alone does not reflect quality of care: implications for pay-for-performance.仅基于死亡率对创伤中心进行基准测试不能反映护理质量:对按绩效付费的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 May;76(5):1184-91. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000215.
6
Medicare program; hospital inpatient prospective payment systems for acute care hospitals and the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and Fiscal Year 2014 rates; quality reporting requirements for specific providers; hospital conditions of participation; payment policies related to patient status. Final rules.医疗保险计划;急性病医院的医院住院病人前瞻性支付系统、长期护理医院前瞻性支付系统及2014财年费率;特定提供者的质量报告要求;医院参与条件;与患者状态相关的支付政策。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2013 Aug 19;78(160):50495-1040.
7
Injuries.损伤
N Engl J Med. 2013 May 2;368(18):1723-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1109343.
8
National Trauma Institute prospective evaluation of the ventilator bundle in trauma patients: does it really work?国家创伤研究所对创伤患者呼吸机捆绑治疗的前瞻性评估:它真的有效吗?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Feb;74(2):354-60; discussion 360-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827a0c65.
9
"Never events": Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services complications after radical cystectomy.“Never events”:在根治性膀胱切除术之后,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的并发症。
Urology. 2013 Mar;81(3):527-32. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.09.050. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
10
Ventilator-associated pneumonia rates at major trauma centers compared with a national benchmark: a multi-institutional study of the AAST.主要创伤中心与国家基准相比的呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率:AAST 的多机构研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 May;72(5):1165-73. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31824d10fa.