College of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Surgery. 2019 Jun;165(6):1116-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 May 7.
Failure to rescue is defined as death after a complication and has been used to evaluate quality of care in adult trauma patients, but there are no published studies on failure to rescue in pediatric trauma. The aim of this study was to define the relationship among rates of mortality, complications, and failure to rescue at centers caring for pediatric (<18 years of age) trauma patients in a nationally representative database.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of the 2015 and 2016 National Trauma Data Bank. We included patients <18 years of age with an Injury Severity Score of ≥9. We excluded centers with <50 pediatric patients or that reported no complications. We calculated the complication, failure to rescue, mortality, and precedence rates by center and divided centers into tertiles of mortality. We compared complication and failure-to-rescue rates between high and low tertiles of mortality using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Of 62,190 patients from 284 centers, 2,204 patients had at least 1 complication for an overall complication rate of 4% (center level 0%-15%), and 120 patients died after a complication for an overall failure-to-rescue rate of 5% (center level 0%-67%). High-mortality centers had both higher failure-to-rescue rates (10% vs 0.6%, P < .001) and higher complication rates (5% vs 4%, P = .001) than lower-mortality hospitals. The overall precedence rate was 15% with a median rate of 0% (interquartile range 0%-25%).
Both complication and failure-to-rescue rates are low in the pediatric injury population, but both complication and failure-to-rescue rates are higher at higher-mortality centers. The low overall complication rates and precedence rates likely limit the utility of failure to rescue as a valid center-level metric in this population, but further investigation into individual failure-to-rescue cases may reveal important opportunities for improvement.
未抢救成功定义为并发症发生后的死亡,已被用于评估成人创伤患者的护理质量,但尚无关于儿科创伤患者未抢救成功的研究。本研究旨在通过全国代表性数据库中治疗儿科(<18 岁)创伤患者的中心的死亡率、并发症和未抢救成功的关系来定义未抢救成功。
我们对 2015 年和 2016 年国家创伤数据库进行了回顾性队列研究。纳入损伤严重度评分≥9 分的<18 岁患者。排除<50 名儿科患者或未报告并发症的中心。我们按中心计算并发症、未抢救成功、死亡率和优先顺序率,并将中心分为死亡率三分位数。我们使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较死亡率高和低三分位数中心的并发症和未抢救成功的发生率。
在 284 个中心的 62190 名患者中,有 2204 名患者至少有 1 种并发症,总体并发症发生率为 4%(中心水平为 0%-15%),120 名患者在并发症后死亡,总体未抢救成功发生率为 5%(中心水平为 0%-67%)。高死亡率中心的未抢救成功发生率(10%比 0.6%,P<0.001)和并发症发生率(5%比 4%,P=0.001)均高于低死亡率医院。整体优先顺序率为 15%,中位数为 0%(四分位间距为 0%-25%)。
儿科损伤人群的并发症和未抢救成功发生率均较低,但高死亡率中心的并发症和未抢救成功发生率均较高。总体较低的并发症发生率和优先顺序率可能限制了未抢救成功作为该人群中有效的中心级指标的实用性,但对个别未抢救成功病例的进一步调查可能会发现重要的改进机会。