Suppr超能文献

情绪调节、应对方式、自我反思和洞察力在法医环境中工作人员与被诊断患有人格障碍的患者互动中的作用。

The role of emotion regulation, coping, self-reflection and insight in staff interaction with patients with a diagnosis of personality disorder in forensic settings.

作者信息

Oostvogels Inez, Bongers Ilja L, Willems Arno

机构信息

De Woenselse Poort, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

GGzE Centre for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Nov;25(9-10):582-600. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12506.

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Interaction between staff and patients with a diagnosis of personality disorder in forensic settings is important for quality of care, but research is lacking on what determines this interaction. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: Insight, emotion-focused coping and emotion regulation of staff influence the interaction between staff and these patients. Staff who understand their own thoughts, feelings and behaviour better (more insight) needed less support, encouragement or back-up from their patients. Staff who cope by getting upset, blaming themselves or fantasizing about solutions (emotion-focused coping) on the contrary needed more support from their patients. Emotion regulation had an impact on the relation between coping and hostile staff behaviour. When staff get upset (emotion-focused coping) and try to think differently about the situation (reappraisal), this makes them behave in a more hostile manner towards their patients. When staff suppress their emotions and also distract themselves or engage in social activities (avoidance-focused coping), they behave in a less hostile manner towards their patients. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: In order to provide compassionate care for their patients, staff ought to be trained in self-compassion. This may help them not to get upset, blame themselves or fantasize about solutions and to understand their own thoughts, feelings and behaviour better. As a result, staff may need less support, encouragement or back-up from their patients. Context is important: Staff ought to suppress their emotions when emotions run high, but only when they also care for themselves by distracting themselves or engaging in social activities. Facing and regulating their emotions by changing what they think about the situation (reappraisal) may be more appropriate once emotions have settled down. This may help staff to remain compassionate towards their patients in the long run and avoid burn-out or compassion fatigue due to ignoring their own needs and boundaries. ABSTRACT: Introduction Research is lacking on what determines interaction between staff and patients with a diagnosis of personality disorder in forensic settings. Aim To test whether coping, self-reflection, insight and emotion regulation are related to the behaviour of staff towards these patients, and to test the possible moderating and mediating effect of emotion regulation. Method Using a cross-sectional design, 76 direct care staff of a forensic clinic completed questionnaires on all variables. Relations were tested using simple linear regression, mediation and moderation analyses. Results Insight and emotion-focused coping of staff were related to seeking less and more support from patients, respectively. Emotion regulation by reappraisal combined with emotion-focused coping was associated with more hostile behaviour by staff, and suppression combined with avoidance-focused coping with less hostile behaviour. Conclusion Insight, emotion-focused coping and emotion regulation of staff influence the quality of care of patients with a diagnosis of personality disorder in forensic settings. Future research ought to include contextual factors. Implications for practice Enhancing self-compassion may improve insight and reduce emotion-focused coping. Context is important: Taking the needs of staff into account may involve suppressing emotions combined with avoidance in a highly emotional situation while facing and reappraising the situation when emotions are low.

摘要

关于该主题已知的信息

在法医环境中,工作人员与被诊断患有 personality disorder 的患者之间的互动对于护理质量很重要,但缺乏关于决定这种互动因素的研究。本文对现有知识的补充:工作人员的洞察力、以情绪为中心的应对方式和情绪调节会影响工作人员与这些患者之间的互动。那些能更好地理解自己的想法、感受和行为(更有洞察力)的工作人员需要患者提供的支持、鼓励或帮助更少。相反,那些通过心烦意乱、自责或幻想解决方案来应对(以情绪为中心的应对方式)的工作人员则需要患者更多的支持。情绪调节对应对方式与工作人员敌对行为之间的关系有影响。当工作人员心烦意乱(以情绪为中心的应对方式)并试图对情况进行不同的思考(重新评估)时,这会使他们对患者表现出更敌对的行为。当工作人员压抑自己的情绪,同时分散自己的注意力或参与社交活动(以回避为中心的应对方式)时,他们对患者的行为就不那么敌对。对实践的启示:为了为患者提供富有同情心的护理,工作人员应该接受自我同情方面的培训。这可能有助于他们不心烦意乱、不自责或幻想解决方案,并更好地理解自己的想法、感受和行为。因此,工作人员可能需要患者提供的支持、鼓励或帮助更少。背景很重要:当情绪高涨时,工作人员应该压抑自己的情绪,但前提是他们也要通过分散注意力或参与社交活动来照顾自己。一旦情绪稳定下来,通过改变对情况的看法来面对和调节情绪(重新评估)可能更合适。这可能有助于工作人员从长远来看对患者保持同情心,并避免因忽视自己的需求和界限而导致倦怠或同情疲劳。摘要:引言缺乏关于在法医环境中决定工作人员与被诊断患有 personality disorder 的患者之间互动因素的研究。目的测试应对方式、自我反思、洞察力和情绪调节是否与工作人员对这些患者的行为相关,并测试情绪调节可能的调节和中介作用。方法采用横断面设计,一家法医诊所的 76 名直接护理人员完成了关于所有变量的问卷调查。使用简单线性回归、中介分析和调节分析来测试关系。结果工作人员的洞察力和以情绪为中心的应对方式分别与从患者那里寻求更少和更多的支持相关。重新评估与以情绪为中心的应对方式相结合的情绪调节与工作人员更多的敌对行为相关,而压抑与以回避为中心的应对方式相结合则与更少的敌对行为相关。结论工作人员的洞察力、以情绪为中心的应对方式和情绪调节会影响法医环境中被诊断患有 personality disorder 的患者的护理质量。未来的研究应该包括背景因素。对实践的启示增强自我同情可能会提高洞察力并减少以情绪为中心的应对方式。背景很重要:考虑工作人员的需求可能包括在情绪高度激动时压抑情绪并结合回避,而在情绪低落时面对并重新评估情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验