University of California Cooperative Extension, University of California - Agriculture and Natural Resources, Alhambra, CA.
Tropical Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Homestead, FL.
J Econ Entomol. 2019 Mar 21;112(2):543-548. doi: 10.1093/jee/toy364.
Nephaspis oculata (Blatchley, 1917) is a whitefly predator which has been reported feeding on several whitefly species. In South Florida, it attacks rugose spiraling whitefly, an invasive pest of urban trees which was first reported in the United States in 2009. The management of rugose spiraling whitefly relies heavily on the use of insecticides which may negatively impact biological control agents. We studied the effect of bifenthrin (spray) and imidacloprid (drench) application on survival, fecundity, and behavior of N. oculata in the laboratory. Adult beetles survived significantly longer in control and systemic imidacloprid compared to bifenthrin treatment, but there was no significant difference between control and systemic imidacloprid applications. However, the fecundity of beetles in the imidacloprid treatment was significantly lower than the control. There was no significant difference between the survival of beetles in bifenthrin and control treatments 3 mo post application. Beetles avoided bifenthrin-treated leaves but did not avoid systemic imidacloprid-treated in a no-choice test. Also, beetles' feeding rate on bifenthrin-treated rugose spiraling whitefly nymphs was significantly lower in a no-choice test. In the choice test, there was a significant difference in feeding rates on whiteflies between choices of bifenthrin/control but no significant difference in the control/control or in imidacloprid/control treatments. The results from this study shows that while systemic imidacloprid has sublethal effects on N. oculata, it does not significantly affect mortality of adult beetles in the tri-trophic system tested. Therefore, using systemic imidacloprid and N. oculata for controlling rugose spiraling whitefly might be compatible or at least not significantly incompatible.
眼斑长足跳小蜂(Blatchley,1917 年)是一种捕食粉虱的天敌,已被报道取食多种粉虱。在南佛罗里达州,它攻击皱螺旋粉虱,这是一种入侵城市树木的害虫,于 2009 年首次在美国报道。皱螺旋粉虱的管理主要依赖于杀虫剂的使用,这可能会对生物防治剂产生负面影响。我们研究了在实验室中使用联苯菊酯(喷雾)和吡虫啉(灌根)对眼斑长足跳小蜂成虫存活、繁殖和行为的影响。与联苯菊酯处理相比,对照和内吸性吡虫啉处理的成虫存活时间明显更长,但对照和内吸性吡虫啉处理之间没有显著差异。然而,吡虫啉处理的成虫繁殖力明显低于对照。在应用后 3 个月,联苯菊酯和对照处理的成虫存活率之间没有显著差异。在无选择试验中,跳小蜂避开了联苯菊酯处理过的叶片,但没有避开内吸性吡虫啉处理过的叶片。此外,在无选择试验中,跳小蜂对处理过的皱螺旋粉虱若虫的取食率明显较低。在选择试验中,在联苯菊酯/对照和对照/对照处理之间,对粉虱的取食率存在显著差异,但在吡虫啉/对照处理之间没有显著差异。本研究结果表明,内吸性吡虫啉对眼斑长足跳小蜂具有亚致死作用,但在测试的三营养级系统中,不会显著影响成虫的死亡率。因此,使用内吸性吡虫啉和眼斑长足跳小蜂控制皱螺旋粉虱可能是兼容的,或者至少没有明显不兼容。