Scheichel Florian, Popadic Branko, Ungersboeck Karl, Marhold Franz
1Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of St. Poelten; and.
2Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems an der Donau, Lower Austria, Austria.
J Neurosurg. 2018 Nov 23;131(4):1227-1234. doi: 10.3171/2018.6.JNS18467. Print 2019 Oct 1.
Unilateral evacuation of bilateral chronic subdural hematomas (bcSDHs) is associated with higher retreatment rates than an initial bilateral intervention. One reason for that is a possible progression in the size of the contralateral side after unilateral treatment. Thus, the authors focused their study on finding predictors of the need for contralateral retreatment.
All patients who had undergone unilateral or bilateral evacuation of bcSDHs in the Department of Neurosurgery at the University Hospital of St. Poelten during a 5-year period (7/2012 to 6/2017) were retrospectively identified. The preoperative hematoma volume was calculated using the XYZ/2 method.
Of a total of 103 patients with bcSDHs, 61 patients underwent bilateral evacuation and 42 patients underwent unilateral evacuation. The retreatment rate after bilateral evacuation was significantly lower than that after unilateral evacuation (14.8% vs 31%, respectively; p = 0.049). Contralateral retreatment after unilateral evacuation was necessary in 9 patients (21.4%). The preoperative contralateral hematoma volume was significantly higher in those patients who needed contralateral retreatment after initial unilateral evacuation (68.4 cm3 vs 27.4 cm3, respectively; p < 0.001). Furthermore, the so-called volume relation ratio created by dividing the smaller by the larger hematoma volume was significantly higher when contralateral retreatment became necessary (0.56 vs 0.21, respectively; p < 0.001).
Patients needing evacuation of bcSDHs should be considered for primary bilateral evacuation if the hematoma volume on the smaller side is greater than 40 cm3 and the subsequent volume relation ratio is greater than 0.4.
双侧慢性硬膜下血肿(bcSDHs)单侧引流与初次双侧干预相比,再治疗率更高。其原因之一可能是单侧治疗后对侧血肿大小可能会进展。因此,作者将研究重点放在寻找对侧再治疗需求的预测因素上。
回顾性确定在圣珀尔滕大学医院神经外科5年期间(2012年7月至2017年6月)接受bcSDHs单侧或双侧引流的所有患者。术前血肿体积采用XYZ/2法计算。
在总共103例bcSDHs患者中,61例接受了双侧引流,42例接受了单侧引流。双侧引流后的再治疗率显著低于单侧引流后(分别为14.8%和31%;p = 0.049)。单侧引流后有9例患者(21.4%)需要对侧再治疗。初次单侧引流后需要对侧再治疗的患者术前对侧血肿体积显著更高(分别为68.4 cm³和27.4 cm³;p < 0.001)。此外,当需要对侧再治疗时,用较小血肿体积除以较大血肿体积得出的所谓体积关系比显著更高(分别为0.56和0.21;p < 0.001)。
如果较小侧血肿体积大于40 cm³且随后的体积关系比大于0.4,对于需要bcSDHs引流的患者应考虑进行初次双侧引流。