• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国贵州省东南部稻田甜水稻(Oryza sativa L.)遗传资源的保存现状及其影响因素。

Status and factors influencing on-farm conservation of Kam Sweet Rice (Oryza sativa L.) genetic resources in southeast Guizhou Province, China.

机构信息

Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China.

College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing, 100081, China.

出版信息

J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2018 Nov 29;14(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13002-018-0256-1.

DOI:10.1186/s13002-018-0256-1
PMID:30497534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6267802/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Kam Sweet Rice (KSR) is a special kind of rice landrace that has been cultivated for thousands of years in the borders of Guizhou, Hunan, and Guangxi Provinces of China, and is mainly distributed in southeast Guizhou Province of China currently. KSR has many unique qualities, including strong resistance to diseases, pests, and adverse abiotic conditions, difficulty of threshing, and well glutinous features. KSR germplasm resources are an indispensable material and cultural symbol in the production and daily life and customs of the Dong people. Related studies showed that numerous traditional KSR varieties and cultivation area of KSR decreased sharply from the Qing dynasty to 2015, but many KSR varieties are still conserved in Dong villages of southeast Guizhou Province compared to other areas. However, the number of KSR varieties that are conserved on farms in southeast Guizhou Province and factors influencing the erosion and conservation of KSR genetic resources is unclear. Therefore, this study was an on-farm conservation investigation of KSR genetic resource in China's major KSR producing areas-Liping, Congjiang, and Rongjiang counties in Guizhou Province and influencing factors analysis of KSR abandonment and conservation.

METHODS

The information of KSR conservation status and variety characteristics, typical villages, Dong's cultural customs, and factors influencing KSR abandonment and conservation was obtained using ethno-biology methods, mainly through field research interviews, including participatory observation, semi-structured interviews, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and cultural anthropology. The altitude, plant height, awn color and length, hull color, and rice color of 156 KSR accessions in 28 villages were recorded. The variety quantity and cultivation area of KSR were investigated in 33 ethnic villages. Questionnaire surveys were conducted in typical Dong villages to obtain local farmers' attitudes toward cultivation and protection of KSR. We randomly selected 26 farmers from Sizhai village and 30 farmers from Huanggang village and chose 3 social characteristics including age, gender, and education levels of farmers, and adopted the method of face-to-face interviewing to complete the questionnaires. Then, we analyzed the correlation and determined the significance between farmers with different social characteristics and farmers' attitudes to KSR development and protection using SPSS 17.0 software.

RESULTS

(1) On-farm conservation status of KSR: a total of 156 KSR varieties were collected from 28 ethnic minority villages from 13 townships (accounting for 21% of three counties) in Liping, Congjiang, and Rongjiang counties. KSR accessions accounted for more than 90% of local rice varieties in each village. According to local farmers, although the quantity of KSR varieties decreased more than 50% in the investigated villages compared to the past 10-20 years, some Dong villages have still cultivated KSR, accounting for more than 50% of the rice field area in 10 villages. This result showed that many KSR varieties are still conserved by in Dong villages, and these KSR varieties have a high genetic diversity of phenotypes. (2) Typical villages investigation: the cultivation area of KSR in Congjiang was the highest, 6.7 times larger than Liping and eight times larger than Rongjiang. In addition, the cultivation area of KSR in Dong villages was larger than that in other ethnic villages, and villages that had a higher planting area of KSR had more KSR accessions. (3) Farmers' attitude toward the development and conservation of KSR: Dong farmers hold the negative attitudes concerning the development of KSR resources, but they thought it is necessary to protect KSR landraces. Especially, a high level of education and female, young, and old farmers played more important roles in the cultivation and protection of KSR.

CONCLUSIONS

Until now, some Dong ethnic villages have still cultivated KSR for thousands of years in Qiandongnan area, although the number of varieties and the planting area of KSR have been greatly reduced. In addition, ethnic traditional culture and social customs were the main influencing factors of KSR conservation; economic, management, and policy factors were the main influencing factors of KSR abandonment. Through the analysis of the correlation between farmers with different social characteristics and their attitudes toward the cultivation, reasons for conservation and abandonment, development tendency, and protection of KSR, we found that a high level of education and female, young, and old farmers play more important role in the cultivation and protection of KSR. Therefore, in order to promote the protection and sustainable utilization of KSR, it is necessary to build on-farm conservation of KSR and improve the position of female farmers and the education level of young people, and encourage the old people to educate the middle-aged to conserve and protect KSR as well as Dong's traditional culture and social customs. This study is of great significance to promote better protection and optimal utilization of KSR and enable the public, government, and related researchers pay more attention to conserving ethnic traditional cultures.

摘要

背景

香禾糯(KSR)是一种特殊的水稻地方品种,在中国贵州、湖南和广西三省区的边境地区已经种植了数千年,目前主要分布在中国东南部的贵州省。KSR 具有许多独特的品质,包括对病虫害和不利非生物条件的强抗性、脱粒困难和良好的粘性。KSR 种质资源是侗族人民生产生活和风俗习惯中不可缺少的物质和文化符号。相关研究表明,从清朝到 2015 年,大量传统的 KSR 品种和 KSR 的种植面积急剧减少,但与其他地区相比,东南部贵州侗族村庄仍保存着许多 KSR 品种。然而,目前尚不清楚在东南部贵州农村地区农场中保存的 KSR 品种数量以及影响 KSR 遗传资源侵蚀和保护的因素。因此,本研究对中国主要 KSR 产区——贵州荔波、从江和榕江县的 KSR 遗传资源进行了农场保护调查,并分析了影响 KSR 弃耕和保护的因素。

方法

采用民族生物学方法,主要通过实地研究访谈,包括参与式观察、半结构式访谈、关键知情人访谈、焦点小组讨论和文化人类学,获取 KSR 保护现状和品种特征、典型村庄、侗族文化习俗以及影响 KSR 弃耕和保护的因素等信息。记录了 28 个村庄的 156 个 KSR 品种的海拔、株高、芒色和长度、颖壳颜色和米色。调查了 33 个民族村庄的 KSR 品种数量和种植面积。在典型的侗族村庄进行问卷调查,以了解当地农民对 KSR 种植和保护的态度。我们从宰荡村随机选择了 26 户农民,从黄岗村选择了 30 户农民,选择了 3 个社会特征,包括农民的年龄、性别和教育水平,并采用面对面访谈的方法完成了问卷。然后,我们使用 SPSS 17.0 软件分析了农民不同社会特征与农民对 KSR 发展和保护的态度之间的相关性,并确定了它们之间的显著性。

结果

(1)KSR 的农场保护现状:从荔波、从江和榕江县的 13 个乡镇(占三个县的 21%)的 28 个少数民族村庄共收集到 156 个 KSR 品种。每个村庄的 KSR 品种占当地水稻品种的 90%以上。根据当地农民的说法,尽管与过去 10-20 年相比,调查村庄的 KSR 品种数量减少了 50%以上,但一些侗族村庄仍在种植 KSR,占 10 个村庄稻田面积的 50%以上。这表明许多 KSR 品种仍在侗族村庄中得到保护,这些 KSR 品种具有高度的表型遗传多样性。(2)典型村庄调查:从江的 KSR 种植面积最高,是荔波的 6.7 倍,是榕江的 8 倍。此外,侗族村庄的 KSR 种植面积大于其他民族村庄,种植面积较大的村庄拥有更多的 KSR 品种。(3)农民对 KSR 发展和保护的态度:侗族农民对 KSR 资源的发展持消极态度,但他们认为保护 KSR 地方品种是必要的。特别是,受教育程度较高、女性、年轻人和老年人在 KSR 的种植和保护中发挥了更重要的作用。

结论

直到现在,在中国东南部的黔东南地区,一些侗族村庄仍然种植 KSR 已有数千年的历史,尽管 KSR 的品种数量和种植面积已经大大减少。此外,民族传统文化和社会习俗是 KSR 保护的主要影响因素,而经济、管理和政策因素是 KSR 弃耕的主要影响因素。通过对不同社会特征的农民与他们对 KSR 种植、保护、发展趋势和保护的态度之间的相关性进行分析,我们发现受教育程度较高、女性、年轻人和老年人在 KSR 的种植和保护中发挥了更重要的作用。因此,为了促进 KSR 的保护和可持续利用,有必要建立 KSR 的农场保护,并提高女性农民和年轻人的地位,鼓励老年人教育中年人和保护 KSR 以及侗族传统文化和社会习俗。本研究对于促进 KSR 的更好保护和优化利用具有重要意义,使公众、政府和相关研究人员更加关注保护民族传统文化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/ebcc7eb0b7b0/13002_2018_256_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/4eb081a1184c/13002_2018_256_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/1c225fa2155a/13002_2018_256_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/eba073396394/13002_2018_256_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/328eeeadc0c9/13002_2018_256_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/92420f928af6/13002_2018_256_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/fdd082ff6915/13002_2018_256_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/c3635cf4e181/13002_2018_256_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/8d597049c360/13002_2018_256_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/7883ccc2e8f4/13002_2018_256_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/5d0df7ac6d53/13002_2018_256_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/b283b081787a/13002_2018_256_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/ebcc7eb0b7b0/13002_2018_256_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/4eb081a1184c/13002_2018_256_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/1c225fa2155a/13002_2018_256_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/eba073396394/13002_2018_256_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/328eeeadc0c9/13002_2018_256_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/92420f928af6/13002_2018_256_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/fdd082ff6915/13002_2018_256_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/c3635cf4e181/13002_2018_256_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/8d597049c360/13002_2018_256_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/7883ccc2e8f4/13002_2018_256_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/5d0df7ac6d53/13002_2018_256_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/b283b081787a/13002_2018_256_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc14/6267802/ebcc7eb0b7b0/13002_2018_256_Fig12_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Status and factors influencing on-farm conservation of Kam Sweet Rice (Oryza sativa L.) genetic resources in southeast Guizhou Province, China.中国贵州省东南部稻田甜水稻(Oryza sativa L.)遗传资源的保存现状及其影响因素。
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2018 Nov 29;14(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13002-018-0256-1.
2
Traditional agricultural management of Kam Sweet Rice (Oryza sativa L.) in southeast Guizhou Province, China.中国贵州省东南部传统的香禾糯(Oryza sativa L.)农业管理。
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2022 Apr 7;18(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13002-022-00528-6.
3
Influence of ethnic traditional cultures on genetic diversity of rice landraces under on-farm conservation in southwest China.中国西南地区田间保存条件下民族传统文化对水稻地方品种遗传多样性的影响
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2016 Oct 27;12(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13002-016-0120-0.
4
Kam Sweet Rice ( L.) Is a Special Ecotypic Rice in Southeast Guizhou, China as Revealed by Genetic Diversity Analysis.基于遗传多样性分析揭示的中国黔东南地区的特种生态型水稻——香禾糯(Kam Sweet Rice, L.)
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Mar 7;13:830556. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.830556. eCollection 2022.
5
Genetic Diversity Evaluation and Conservation of Kam Fragrant Glutinous Rice ( L.) Germplasm in Southeast Guizhou, China.中国黔东南香禾糯(L.)种质资源的遗传多样性评价与保护
Plants (Basel). 2021 Sep 14;10(9):1898. doi: 10.3390/plants10091898.
6
[On-farm conservation and utilization of paddy rice, wheat and maize landrace varieties in 15 unique ethnic groups in Yunnan, China].[中国云南15个独特民族群体对水稻、小麦和玉米地方品种的田间保护与利用]
Yi Chuan. 2012 Nov;34(11):1466-74. doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1005.2012.01465.
7
Ethnobotanical studies on rice landraces under on-farm conservation in Xishuangbanna of Yunnan Province, China.中国云南西双版纳稻作梯田中田间保护稻种的民族植物学研究。
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2024 Apr 29;20(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13002-024-00683-y.
8
Genomic footprints of Kam Sweet Rice domestication indicate possible migration routes of the Dong people in China and provide resources for future rice breeding.基因组足迹揭示了中国侗族人对香米的驯化过程,可能为其迁徙路线提供线索,并为未来的水稻育种提供资源。
Mol Plant. 2023 Feb 6;16(2):415-431. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2022.12.020. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
9
Diversity, knowledge, and valuation of plants used as fermentation starters for traditional glutinous rice wine by Dong communities in Southeast Guizhou, China.中国东南部侗族社区用于传统糯米酒发酵的植物的多样性、知识和价值评估。
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2019 Apr 27;15(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13002-019-0299-y.
10
Agrobiodiversity and in situ conservation in ethnic minority communities of Xishuangbanna in Yunnan Province, Southwest China.中国西南部云南省西双版纳少数民族社区的农业生物多样性与原地保护
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017 May 15;13(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13002-017-0158-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of hormone concentrations on anther cultures and the acquisition of regenerated plants of five awnless triticale genotypes.激素浓度对五种无芒小黑麦基因型花药培养及再生植株获得的影响。
Plant Methods. 2025 Jan 7;21(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13007-024-01322-z.
2
Ethnobotanical studies on rice landraces under on-farm conservation in Xishuangbanna of Yunnan Province, China.中国云南西双版纳稻作梯田中田间保护稻种的民族植物学研究。
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2024 Apr 29;20(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13002-024-00683-y.
3
Characteristics of antioxidant capacity and metabolomics analysis of flavonoids in the bran layer of green glutinous rice (Oryza sativa L. var. Glutinosa Matsum).

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of ethnic traditional cultures on genetic diversity of rice landraces under on-farm conservation in southwest China.中国西南地区田间保存条件下民族传统文化对水稻地方品种遗传多样性的影响
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2016 Oct 27;12(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13002-016-0120-0.
2
Diachronic analysis of genetic diversity in rice landraces under on-farm conservation in Yunnan, China.中国云南农田中稻种遗传多样性的历时分析。
Theor Appl Genet. 2016 Jan;129(1):155-68. doi: 10.1007/s00122-015-2617-7.
3
Genetic diversity and population structure of rice landraces from Eastern and North Eastern States of India.
绿糯米(Oryza sativa L. var. Glutinosa Matsum)糠层中黄酮类化合物抗氧化能力的特征及代谢组学分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 29;13(1):16372. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43466-3.
4
Traditional agricultural management of Kam Sweet Rice (Oryza sativa L.) in southeast Guizhou Province, China.中国贵州省东南部传统的香禾糯(Oryza sativa L.)农业管理。
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2022 Apr 7;18(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13002-022-00528-6.
5
Kam Sweet Rice ( L.) Is a Special Ecotypic Rice in Southeast Guizhou, China as Revealed by Genetic Diversity Analysis.基于遗传多样性分析揭示的中国黔东南地区的特种生态型水稻——香禾糯(Kam Sweet Rice, L.)
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Mar 7;13:830556. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.830556. eCollection 2022.
6
Traditional knowledge of edible plants used as flavoring for fish-grilling in Southeast Guizhou, China.中国贵州东南部用于烤鱼调味的食用植物传统知识。
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2022 Mar 18;18(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13002-022-00519-7.
7
Edible Plant Oil: Global Status, Health Issues, and Perspectives.食用植物油:全球现状、健康问题及展望
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Aug 28;11:1315. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01315. eCollection 2020.
印度东部和东北部水稻地方品种的遗传多样性和种群结构。
BMC Genet. 2013 Aug 15;14:71. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-14-71.
4
Genetic structure and diversity of indigenous rice (Oryza sativa) varieties in the Eastern Himalayan region of Northeast India.印度东北部喜马拉雅东部地区本土水稻(Oryza sativa)品种的遗传结构与多样性。
Springerplus. 2013 May 19;2(1):228. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-228. Print 2013 Dec.
5
Effectiveness of in situ and ex situ conservation of crop diversity. What a Phaseolus vulgaris L. landrace case study can tell us.作物多样性原地和迁地保护的有效性。菜豆地方品种案例研究能告诉我们什么。
Genetica. 2010 Oct;138(9-10):985-98. doi: 10.1007/s10709-010-9485-5. Epub 2010 Sep 11.
6
Spatio-temporal dynamics of genetic diversity in Sorghum bicolor in Niger.尼日尔高粱遗传多样性的时空动态。
Theor Appl Genet. 2010 May;120(7):1301-13. doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1257-1. Epub 2010 Jan 9.
7
Intellectual property. Chinese province crafts pioneering law to thwart biopiracy.知识产权。中国省份制定开创性法律以挫败生物剽窃行为。
Science. 2008 May 9;320(5877):732-3. doi: 10.1126/science.320.5877.732.
8
Assessing the impact of the green revolution, 1960 to 2000.评估1960年至2000年绿色革命的影响。
Science. 2003 May 2;300(5620):758-62. doi: 10.1126/science.1078710.
9
Molecular evidence on the origin and evolution of glutinous rice.关于糯米起源与演化的分子证据。
Genetics. 2002 Oct;162(2):941-50. doi: 10.1093/genetics/162.2.941.
10
Genetic diversity of barley landrace accessions (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare) conserved for different lengths of time in ex situ gene banks.在异地基因库中保存不同时长的大麦地方品种种质(普通大麦亚种)的遗传多样性。
Heredity (Edinb). 2000 Apr;84 ( Pt 4):476-86. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00705.x.