Xu Fu-Rong, Yang Ya-Yun, Zhang En-Lai, A Xin-Xiang, Tang Cui-Feng, Dong Chao, Zhang Fei-Fei, Liu Xu, Dai Lu-Yuan
Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yunnan, China.
Yi Chuan. 2012 Nov;34(11):1466-74. doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1005.2012.01465.
On-farm conservation and utilization of crop landraces have been proposed as means of conserving plant germplasm, in contrast to ex situ germplasm conservation, but little is known about the effectiveness of this approach. This paper reports the findings from a survey conducted in 15 unique ethnic groups of the Yunnan Province on the conservation and utilization of paddy rice, wheat (including wheat, barley, oats, and rye) and maize landrace varieties through participatory rural appraisal (PRA) and questionnaires. The surveyed regions covered 306 villages (the village group) from 237 administrative villages in 124 towns (township) distributed in 36 counties of 11 prefectures (city) in Yunnan Province. The survey showed that 44.8%, 77.5%, and 37.3% of the visited villages had lost their paddy rice, wheat, and maize landraces, respectively. A total of 901 landraces were collected, including 371 rice, 119 wheat, and 411 maize varieties, respectively. There were 2.9 on-farm varieties on average per village, 3.3, 8.0 and 5.2 varieties on average per 100 households, 1 000 peasants and 100 Ha farmland areas, respectively. Among the 306 villages, two villages (Laomian and Qingkou) maintained the highest crop diversity with 18 varieties (including 10 rice and 8 maize varieties) and 14 paddy rice varieties. Also, on-farm varieties in different ethnic groups varied significantly from each other, ranging from 16 to 120 varieties per group. The diversity of paddy rice varieties was the highest, ranging from 1 to 72, and the diversity was mainly distributed in southern, southwest Yunnan of tropical, subtropical ethnic regions. The wheat varieties ranged from 0 to 47 and distributed in northern, northwest Yunnan of high altitude, temperature, and cold ethnic regions. The maize varieties ranged from 4 to 40. These patterns of variation in on-farm varieties are directly associated with traditional culture and custom for the ethnic minorities and reflect the lack of improved varieties for the local special environments. These findings confirm the role of on-farm conservation in plant genetic resources in China and provide baseline information for better on-farm conservation and utilization of plant germplasm in China.
与异地种质资源保存不同,农田作物地方品种的保存和利用已被提议作为保护植物种质的一种方式,但对这种方法的有效性了解甚少。本文报告了通过参与式农村评估(PRA)和问卷调查,对云南省15个独特民族群体中水稻、小麦(包括小麦、大麦、燕麦和黑麦)和玉米地方品种的保存和利用情况进行调查的结果。调查区域覆盖了云南省11个州市36个县124个乡镇237个行政村中的306个村庄(村组)。调查显示,分别有44.8%、77.5%和37.3%的受访村庄失去了其水稻、小麦和玉米地方品种。共收集到901个地方品种,其中分别有371个水稻品种、119个小麦品种和411个玉米品种。平均每个村庄有2.9个农田品种,每100户、1000名农民和100公顷农田面积分别平均有3.3个、8.0个和5.2个品种。在306个村庄中,两个村庄(老缅和青口)拥有最高的作物多样性,分别有18个品种(包括10个水稻品种和8个玉米品种)和14个水稻品种。此外,不同民族群体的农田品种差异显著,每个群体从16个到120个品种不等。水稻品种的多样性最高,从1个到72个不等,且多样性主要分布在云南南部、西南部的热带、亚热带民族地区。小麦品种从0个到47个不等,分布在云南北部、西北部高海拔、低温和寒冷的民族地区。玉米品种从4个到40个不等。这些农田品种的变异模式与少数民族的传统文化和习俗直接相关,反映出针对当地特殊环境的改良品种的缺乏。这些发现证实了农田保存在中国植物遗传资源中的作用,并为中国更好地进行农田植物种质资源的保存和利用提供了基线信息。