Güntürk Özgün Barış, Kayalar Murat, Kaplan İbrahim, Uludağ Abuzer, Özaksar Kemal, Keleşoğlu Beray
Gaziantep Dr. Ersin Arslan Education and Research Hospital, Şahinbey, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Emot Hospital, Kahramanlar, İzmir, Turkey.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018 Sep;52(5):382-386. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
There has been no consensus in literature for the ideal flexor tendon repair technique. The results of zone 2 flexor tendon lacerations repaired primarily by 4 strand Modified Kessler core suture and epitendinous interlocking suture technique followed by Modified Kleinert protocol were investigated.
128 fingers of 89 patients who had flexor tendon laceration in zone 2 built the working group. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Strickland formula. A statistical analysis was made between Strickland scores and some parameters such as age, gender, follow-up time, co-existing injury existence, repair time, single or multiple finger injury, tendon rupture and the effect of FDS injury and repair.
Excellent, good, fair, poor results were obtained from 71 (55.5%), 46 (35.9%), 8 (6.3%), 3 (2.3%) fingers, respectively. Time of the repair has a significant effect on the strickland scores. Surgery performed within the first 24 hours following the injury gave better results. 3 fingers (2.3%) had tendon ruptures. Existence of ruptures affected the results significantly. Co-existing injuries were found that they did not have any effect on the results. In the fingers in which both FDP and FDS tendons were lacerated, no significant relationship was found between only FDP repair, both FDP and FDS repair and single FDS slip repair. Additionally no significant relationships between follow-up time, gender, single or multiple finger injury and Strickland scores were observed. 13 fingers (10.1%) had PIP joint contracture above 20°.
The low rupture rate (2.3%) and 91.4% 'good' and 'excellent' scoring rates in our series support the idea that modified Kessler 4-strand core suture and epitendinous interlocking suture repair combined with modified Kleinert protocol gives satisfactory results. Repair time is one of the most important factors affecting the functional results and surgery should not be delayed if there is an experienced surgeon available.
Level IV, therapeutic study.
对于理想的屈指肌腱修复技术,文献中尚无共识。本研究调查了采用4股改良凯斯勒核心缝合和腱周连锁缝合法,并遵循改良克莱纳特方案,对Ⅱ区屈指肌腱裂伤进行一期修复的效果。
89例Ⅱ区屈指肌腱裂伤患者的128根手指纳入研究组。采用斯特里克兰德公式评估功能结果。对斯特里克兰德评分与年龄、性别、随访时间、合并损伤情况、修复时间、单指或多指损伤、肌腱断裂以及指浅屈肌(FDS)损伤与修复的影响等参数进行统计学分析。
分别有71根(55.5%)、46根(35.9%)、8根(6.3%)、3根(2.3%)手指获得优、良、可、差的结果。修复时间对斯特里克兰德评分有显著影响。伤后24小时内进行手术效果更佳。3根手指(2.3%)发生肌腱断裂。肌腱断裂的发生对结果有显著影响。发现合并损伤对结果无任何影响。在指深屈肌(FDP)和FDS肌腱均断裂的手指中,仅修复FDP、同时修复FDP和FDS以及单独修复FDS滑脱之间未发现显著相关性。此外,未观察到随访时间、性别、单指或多指损伤与斯特里克兰德评分之间存在显著相关性。13根手指(10.1%)出现近端指间关节(PIP)挛缩超过20°。
本研究系列中低肌腱断裂率(2.3%)以及91.4%的“优”和“良”评分率支持以下观点:改良凯斯勒4股核心缝合和腱周连锁缝合法联合改良克莱纳特方案可取得满意效果。修复时间是影响功能结果的最重要因素之一,如果有经验丰富的外科医生,手术不应延迟。
IV级,治疗性研究。