Australian Centre for Precision Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Regional Cancer Centre Uppsala, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):676-683. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.022. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
Some studies suggest that gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists are associated with higher risk of adverse events than antiandrogens (AAs) monotherapy. However, it has been unclear whether this is due to indication bias.
To investigate rates of change in comorbidity for men on GnRH agonists versus AA monotherapy in a population-based register study.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Men with advanced nonmetastatic prostate cancer (PCa) who received primary AA (n=2078) or GnRH agonists (n=4878) and age- and area-matched PCa-free men were selected from Prostate Cancer Database Sweden 3.0. Increases in comorbidity were measured using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), from 5yr before through to 5yr after starting androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).
Multivariable linear regression was used to determine differences in excess rate of CCI change before and after ADT initiation. Risk of any incremental change in CCI following ADT was assessed using multivariable Cox regression analyses.
Men on GnRH agonists experienced a greater difference in excess rate of CCI change after starting ADT than men on AA monotherapy (5.6% per yr, p<0.001). Risk of any new CCI change after ADT was greater for GnRH agonists than for AA (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.44).
Impact on comorbidity was lower for men on AA monotherapy than for men on GnRH agonists. Our results should be confirmed through randomised trials of effectiveness and adverse effects, comparing AA monotherapy and GnRH agonists in men with advanced nonmetastatic PCa who are unsuitable for curative treatment.
Hormone therapies for advanced prostate cancer can increase the risk of other diseases (eg, heart disease, diabetes). This study compared two common forms of hormone therapy and found that the risk of another serious disease was higher for those on gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists than for those on antiandrogen monotherapy.
一些研究表明,促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂与抗雄激素(AA)单药治疗相比,不良事件的风险更高。然而,尚不清楚这是否是由于适应证偏倚所致。
在一项基于人群的登记研究中,调查 GnRH 激动剂与 AA 单药治疗的男性患者合并症变化率。
设计、地点和参与者:从瑞典前列腺癌数据库 3.0 中选择了接受一线 AA(n=2078)或 GnRH 激动剂(n=4878)治疗的晚期非转移性前列腺癌(PCa)男性患者和年龄及地区匹配的无 PCa 男性患者。使用 Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)测量合并症的增加,从开始雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)前 5 年到后 5 年。
使用多变量线性回归来确定 ADT 起始前后 CCI 变化的超额率差异。使用多变量 Cox 回归分析评估 ADT 后 CCI 任何增量变化的风险。
与 AA 单药治疗的男性相比,接受 GnRH 激动剂治疗的男性在开始 ADT 后 CCI 变化的超额率差异更大(每年 5.6%,p<0.001)。与 AA 相比, GnRH 激动剂治疗后发生任何新的 CCI 变化的风险更高(风险比,1.32;95%置信区间,1.20-1.44)。
AA 单药治疗的男性患者合并症的影响低于 GnRH 激动剂治疗的男性患者。我们的结果应通过比较不适合治愈性治疗的晚期非转移性 PCa 男性患者的 AA 单药治疗和 GnRH 激动剂的有效性和不良反应的随机试验来证实。
晚期前列腺癌的激素治疗会增加其他疾病(如心脏病、糖尿病)的风险。这项研究比较了两种常见的激素治疗方法,发现接受促性腺激素释放激素激动剂治疗的患者发生另一种严重疾病的风险高于接受抗雄激素单药治疗的患者。