• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科罗拉多工人赔偿提供者阿片类药物管理方案对慢性疼痛治疗指南依从性的影响。

Effect of an opioid management program for Colorado workers' compensation providers on adherence to treatment guidelines for chronic pain.

机构信息

Center for Health, Work & Environment, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.

出版信息

Am J Ind Med. 2019 Jan;62(1):21-29. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22920. Epub 2018 Nov 30.

DOI:10.1002/ajim.22920
PMID:30499587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6558965/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine adherence of state guidelines for Colorado workers' compensation physicians/providers treating individuals as injured workers with chronic pain after initiation of an opioid management program and provider incentives.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of chronic, non-cancer pain claims was constructed from the Colorado's workers' compensation database. Adherence to treatment guidelines and opioid prescribing practices were evaluated during implementation of a new billing code to incentivize adherence.

RESULTS

Overall, less than 33% of claims showed evidence of opioid management. Comprehensive opioid management was observed in only 4.4% of claims. In 2010, after implementing the new billing code, the ratio of long acting opioids to short acting opioids decreased from 0.2 to 0.13; returning to 0.2 in one year. Similarly, morphine equivalent doses declined for a short period.

CONCLUSIONS

Incentivizing physicians to adhere to chronic pain management guidelines only temporarily improves prescribing practices.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查科罗拉多州工伤赔偿医生/提供者在实施阿片类药物管理方案和提供激励措施后,对治疗慢性疼痛的个体作为受伤工人的州指南的依从性。

方法

从科罗拉多州工人赔偿数据库中构建了一组慢性非癌症疼痛的回顾性队列。在实施新计费代码以激励依从性的过程中,评估了治疗指南和阿片类药物处方实践的依从性。

结果

总体而言,不到 33%的索赔显示出阿片类药物管理的证据。只有 4.4%的索赔显示出全面的阿片类药物管理。2010 年,在实施新计费代码后,长效阿片类药物与短效阿片类药物的比例从 0.2 降至 0.13;一年后又回升至 0.2。类似地,吗啡等效剂量在短时间内下降。

结论

仅仅激励医生遵守慢性疼痛管理指南只能暂时改善处方实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0613/6558965/f473a0f6085b/nihms-1030564-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0613/6558965/64a2ac36e840/nihms-1030564-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0613/6558965/66d82404cde7/nihms-1030564-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0613/6558965/f473a0f6085b/nihms-1030564-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0613/6558965/64a2ac36e840/nihms-1030564-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0613/6558965/66d82404cde7/nihms-1030564-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0613/6558965/f473a0f6085b/nihms-1030564-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of an opioid management program for Colorado workers' compensation providers on adherence to treatment guidelines for chronic pain.科罗拉多工人赔偿提供者阿片类药物管理方案对慢性疼痛治疗指南依从性的影响。
Am J Ind Med. 2019 Jan;62(1):21-29. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22920. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
2
Changes in early high-risk opioid prescribing practices after policy interventions in Washington State.华盛顿州政策干预后早期高危阿片类药物处方行为的变化。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb;56(1):49-60. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13564. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
3
Early High-Risk Opioid Prescribing and Persistent Opioid Use in Australian Workers with Workers' Compensation Claims for Back and Neck Musculoskeletal Disorders or Injuries: A Retrospective Cohort Study.澳大利亚因背部和颈部肌肉骨骼疾病或损伤提出工伤赔偿申请的工人中早期高风险阿片类药物处方与持续阿片类药物使用情况:一项回顾性队列研究
CNS Drugs. 2025 May;39(5):499-512. doi: 10.1007/s40263-025-01169-5. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
4
The Impact of Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose Threshold Guidelines on Prescribed Dose in a Workers' Compensation Population.吗啡等效日剂量阈值指南对工人补偿人群中处方剂量的影响。
Med Care. 2020 Mar;58(3):241-247. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001269.
5
Opioid Use for Treatment of Chronic Pain: An Overview and Treatment Guideline for Injured Workers Responses.阿片类药物用于慢性疼痛治疗:工伤员工应对措施概述及治疗指南
WMJ. 2017 Jun;116(2):61-63.
6
Prescription opioids for occupational injury: results from workers' compensation claims records.用于职业伤害的处方阿片类药物:来自工伤赔偿申请记录的结果
Pain Med. 2014 Sep;15(9):1549-57. doi: 10.1111/pme.12421. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
7
Impacts of State-Level Opioid Review Programs on Injured Workers and Their Health Care Providers: A Qualitative Study in Washington and Ohio.州级阿片类药物审查项目对受伤工人及其医疗保健提供者的影响:华盛顿州和俄亥俄州的定性研究。
Milbank Q. 2024 Sep;102(3):605-631. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12705. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
8
Implementation of an Opioid Guideline Impacts on Opioid Prescriptions, Adverse Outcomes, and an Association with a State Opioid-Related Fatalities.阿片类药物指南的实施对阿片类药物处方、不良后果以及与州阿片类相关死亡的关联有影响。
J Occup Environ Med. 2019 Aug;61(8):653-658. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001640.
9
Association Between Pre-Injury Opioid Use and Opioid Use Patterns After a Work Injury.工伤前阿片类药物使用与工伤后阿片类药物使用模式之间的关联
Am J Ind Med. 2025 Feb;68(2):132-139. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23683. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
10
Increases in the use and cost of opioids to treat acute and chronic pain in injured workers, 1999 to 2009.1999 年至 2009 年期间,用于治疗受伤工人急性和慢性疼痛的阿片类药物的使用和费用增加。
J Occup Environ Med. 2012 Feb;54(2):216-23. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318240de33.

引用本文的文献

1
APCDs can Provide Important Insights for Surveilling the Opioid Epidemic, With Caveats.APCDs 可提供监测阿片类药物流行的重要洞见,但有 caveats。
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Aug;79(4):594-601. doi: 10.1177/10775587211062382. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
2
Misalignment of Stakeholder Incentives in the Opioid Crisis.阿片类药物危机中利益相关者激励机制的错位。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 16;17(20):7535. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207535.
3
Strengths and weaknesses of existing data sources to support research to address the opioids crisis.

本文引用的文献

1
Is Early Prescribing of Opioid and Psychotropic Medications Associated With Delayed Return to Work and Increased Final Workers' Compensation Cost?早期开具阿片类药物和精神药物与延迟重返工作岗位及最终工人赔偿成本增加有关吗?
J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Dec;57(12):1315-8. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000557.
2
Variability in Opioid Equivalence Calculations.阿片类药物等效性计算的变异性。
Pain Med. 2016 May 1;17(5):892-898. doi: 10.1111/pme.12920. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
3
Guideline for Prescribing Opioids to Treat Pain in Injured Workers.给受伤工人开具阿片类药物治疗疼痛的指南。
现有数据来源在支持应对阿片类药物危机研究方面的优势与不足。
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Nov 6;17:101015. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.101015. eCollection 2020 Mar.
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015 Aug;26(3):453-65. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2015.04.005.
4
Trends in opioid analgesic abuse and mortality in the United States.美国阿片类镇痛药滥用和死亡率的趋势。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 15;372(3):241-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1406143.
5
ACOEM practice guidelines: opioids for treatment of acute, subacute, chronic, and postoperative pain.美国职业与环境医学学会实践指南:用于治疗急性、亚急性、慢性和术后疼痛的阿片类药物
J Occup Environ Med. 2014 Dec;56(12):e143-59. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000352.
6
Prescription opioids for occupational injury: results from workers' compensation claims records.用于职业伤害的处方阿片类药物:来自工伤赔偿申请记录的结果
Pain Med. 2014 Sep;15(9):1549-57. doi: 10.1111/pme.12421. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
7
A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy comparison of short- and long-acting dihydrocodeine in chronic non-malignant pain.长效与短效双氢可待因治疗慢性非恶性疼痛的随机双盲双模拟对照研究
Pain. 2014 May;155(5):881-888. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.12.016. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
8
Changes in opioid prescribing for Washington workers' compensation claimants after implementation of an opioid dosing guideline for chronic noncancer pain: 2004 to 2010.华盛顿工人赔偿索赔者阿片类药物处方变化:2004 年至 2010 年实施慢性非癌症疼痛阿片类药物剂量指南后。
J Pain. 2013 Dec;14(12):1620-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.08.001.
9
Changes in opioid prescribing for chronic pain in Washington State.华盛顿州慢性疼痛阿片类药物处方的变化。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;26(4):394-400. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.04.120274.
10
The effect of opioid use on workers' compensation claim cost in the State of Michigan.密歇根州阿片类药物使用对工人赔偿索赔成本的影响。
J Occup Environ Med. 2012 Aug;54(8):948-53. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318252249b.