• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜袖状胃切除术比腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术术后出血风险更低。

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy has a Lower Risk of Postoperative Bleeding Than Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

作者信息

Zafar Syed Nabeel, Shockcor Nicole, Prasad Nikhil, Wise Eric S, Jackson Hope T, Kligman Mark

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2019 Feb;29(1):53-57. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000598.

DOI:10.1097/SLE.0000000000000598
PMID:30499889
Abstract

Measures to reduce postoperative bleeding (POB) after bariatric surgery is skewed toward laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). We use 2015 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) to characterize the differences in bleeding rates between LSG and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses (LRYGB). Propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regressions tested for independent differences in POB rates. A total of 168,093 patients from 742 centers were identified in the data set. After selection 36,925 patients with LRYGB and 20,020 patients with LSG were included in the analysis. A total of 710 (1.25%) patient suffered a POB. The independent odds of POB were 38% lower for patients having LSG compared with those having LRYGB (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval=0.51-0.76). This difference is more pronounced with intraoperative securing of the staple line. Appropriate measures to reduce POB after each type of bariatric procedure is warranted.

摘要

减肥手术后减少术后出血(POB)的措施偏向于腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)。我们使用2015年代谢与减肥手术认证及质量改进计划(MBSAQIP)来描述LSG与腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)之间出血率的差异。倾向评分匹配和多变量逻辑回归检验了POB率的独立差异。在数据集中共识别出来自742个中心的168,093名患者。经过筛选,36,925例LRYGB患者和20,020例LSG患者被纳入分析。共有710名(1.25%)患者发生POB。与接受LRYGB的患者相比,接受LSG的患者发生POB的独立几率低38%(比值比,0.62;95%置信区间=0.51-0.76)。术中固定吻合钉线时,这种差异更为明显。每种减肥手术术后都需要采取适当措施来减少POB。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy has a Lower Risk of Postoperative Bleeding Than Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术比腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术术后出血风险更低。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2019 Feb;29(1):53-57. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000598.
2
Is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy safer than laparoscopic gastric bypass? a comparison of 30-day complications using the MBSAQIP data registry.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术比腹腔镜胃旁路术更安全吗?利用 MBSAQIP 数据登记系统比较 30 天并发症。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Mar;14(3):264-269. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.12.011. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
3
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the pediatric population: a MBSAQIP analysis.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术在儿科人群中的比较:MBSAQIP 分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 Feb;16(2):254-260. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.11.009. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
4
Perioperative Outcomes of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: an Analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Database.糖尿病患者行 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术的围手术期结局:代谢和减重手术认证和质量改进计划(MBSAQIP)数据库分析。
Obes Surg. 2020 Jan;30(1):111-118. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04175-x.
5
A Retrospective 2-Year Follow-up of Late Complications Treated Surgically and Endoscopically After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) for Morbid Obesity.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)和腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)治疗病态肥胖后手术和内镜治疗晚期并发症的2年回顾性随访
Obes Surg. 2018 Apr;28(4):1055-1062. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2967-0.
6
Comparison of cholecystectomy cases after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and gastric banding.比较 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术、袖状胃切除术和胃束带术治疗胆囊切除术后的病例。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Jan-Feb;10(1):64-8. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.04.019. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
7
Safety of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in elderly patients - analysis of the MBSAQIP.老年人腹腔镜袖状胃切除术和 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的安全性 - MBSAQIP 分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Sep;14(9):1276-1282. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
8
Procedure-related morbidity in bariatric surgery: a retrospective short- and mid-term follow-up of a single institution of the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence.减重手术相关发病率:美国外科医师学会减重手术卓越中心单机构的回顾性短期和中期随访。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Oct;217(4):614-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
9
Primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus gastric bypass: a propensity-matched comparison of 30-day outcomes.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与胃旁路术:30 天结局的倾向评分匹配比较。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021 Jul;17(7):1369-1382. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.01.022. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
10
Postoperative Care and Functional Recovery After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Among Patients Under ERAS Protocol.在加速康复外科(ERAS)方案下,腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后的护理及功能恢复情况对比
Obes Surg. 2018 Apr;28(4):1031-1039. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2964-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Causes for Reoperation and Reintervention Following Bariatric Surgery.减肥手术后再次手术和再次干预原因中的种族和族裔差异。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Feb 17. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02302-2.
2
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy with Staple-Line Oversewing in a Patient with Factor XI Deficiency: A Case Report.11因子缺乏患者行腹腔镜袖状胃切除术并缝合吻合线:一例报告
Am J Case Rep. 2024 Apr 24;25:e942824. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.942824.
3
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy effects on obesity comorbidities: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Roux-en-Y胃旁路术和腹腔镜袖状胃切除术对肥胖合并症的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Surg. 2022 Dec 2;9:953804. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.953804. eCollection 2022.
4
Improving Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery in Patients With Cirrhosis in the United States: A Nationwide Assessment.改善美国肝硬化患者减重手术的结局:一项全国性评估。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov;115(11):1849-1856. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000911.
5
Quality of MBSAQIP data: bad luck, or lack of QA plan?MBSAQIP 数据的质量:是运气不好,还是缺乏质量保证计划?
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):973-980. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06884-x. Epub 2019 Jun 12.