• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

底泥疏浚长期控制砷、硒和锑污染的效果。

Long-term effectiveness of sediment dredging on controlling the contamination of arsenic, selenium, and antimony.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Integrated Regulation and Resource Development on Shallow Lakes, Ministry of Education, College of Environment, Hohai University, Nanjing, 210098, China.

State Key Laboratory of Lake Science and Environment, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China.

出版信息

Environ Pollut. 2019 Feb;245:725-734. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.050. Epub 2018 Nov 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.050
PMID:30500752
Abstract

This study assessed the effectiveness of dredging in controlling arsenic (As), selenium (Se), and antimony (Sb) contamination in sediments, by examining contaminant concentrations in sediments six years after dredging was completed. High-resolution diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) and dialysis (HR-Peeper) techniques were used to monitor the concentrations of DGT-labile metalloids and soluble metalloids in sediments, respectively. Results revealed that dredging effectively remediated metalloid contamination in sediments only in April, July and/or January. Compared to non-dredged sediments, the concentrations of soluble and DGT-labile As, Se, and Sb in dredged sediments decreased on average by 42%, 52%, and 43% (soluble), and 54%, 50%, and 53% (DGT), respectively. The effectiveness of the dredging was primarily due to the transformation of metalloids from labile to inert fractions, which increased the ability of the sediments to retain the metalloids, and the slowed rate of resupplied metalloids from available solid pools. In contrast, negligible/negative effects of dredging were seen in October, and the concentrations of soluble and DGT-labile metalloids even increased in some profiles of dredged sediments. This was mainly caused by a release of the metalloids from algal degradation, which may offset the dredging effectiveness.

摘要

本研究通过在疏浚完成六年后检测沉积物中污染物浓度,评估了疏浚在控制砷(As)、硒(Se)和锑(Sb)污染方面的效果。采用高分辨率扩散梯度薄膜(DGT)和透析(HR-Peeper)技术分别监测沉积物中 DGT 不稳定类金属元素和可溶性类金属元素的浓度。结果表明,疏浚仅在 4 月、7 月和/或 1 月有效修复了沉积物中的类金属污染。与未疏浚沉积物相比,疏浚沉积物中可溶性和 DGT 不稳定砷、硒和锑的浓度平均分别降低了 42%、52%和 43%(可溶性)和 54%、50%和 53%(DGT)。疏浚的有效性主要归因于类金属从不稳定态向惰性态的转化,增加了沉积物保留类金属的能力,并减缓了从可用固相库中补充类金属的速度。相比之下,10 月疏浚的效果微不足道/为负,一些疏浚沉积物的剖面中可溶性和 DGT 不稳定类金属元素的浓度甚至增加。这主要是由于藻类降解导致类金属释放,这可能抵消了疏浚的效果。

相似文献

1
Long-term effectiveness of sediment dredging on controlling the contamination of arsenic, selenium, and antimony.底泥疏浚长期控制砷、硒和锑污染的效果。
Environ Pollut. 2019 Feb;245:725-734. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.050. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
2
Long-term effects of sediment dredging on controlling cobalt, zinc, and nickel contamination determined by chemical fractionation and passive sampling.长期疏浚底泥对控制钴、锌和镍污染的影响研究——化学形态分析和被动采样法。
Chemosphere. 2019 Apr;220:476-485. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.138. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
3
Efficacy of dredging engineering as a means to remove heavy metals from lake sediments.疏浚工程作为去除湖泊沉积物中重金属的一种手段的效果。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 May 15;665:181-190. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.057. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
4
Successful control of internal phosphorus loading after sediment dredging for 6years: A field assessment using high-resolution sampling techniques.经过 6 年的底泥疏浚,成功控制了内部磷负荷:使用高分辨率采样技术的现场评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Mar;616-617:927-936. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.227. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
5
Assessing the remobilization of Antimony in sediments by DGT: A case study in a tributary of the Three Gorges Reservoir.应用 DGT 评估沉积物中锑的再悬浮作用:三峡库区一条支流的案例研究。
Environ Pollut. 2016 Jul;214:600-607. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.030. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
6
Impacts of Arsenic and Antimony Co-Contamination on Sedimentary Microbial Communities in Rivers with Different Pollution Gradients.砷和锑共存污染对不同污染梯度河流沉积物微生物群落的影响。
Microb Ecol. 2019 Oct;78(3):589-602. doi: 10.1007/s00248-019-01327-5. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
7
In situ high-resolution evaluation of labile arsenic and mercury in sediment of a large shallow lake.原位高分辨率评价大型浅水湖泊沉积物中不稳定的砷和汞。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Jan 15;541:83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.037. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
8
Metal/metalloid and phosphorus characteristics in porewater associated with manganese geochemistry: A case study in the Jiulong River Estuary, China.与锰地球化学有关的孔隙水中金属/类金属和磷的特征:以中国九龙江河口为例。
Environ Pollut. 2019 Dec;255(Pt 1):113134. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113134. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
9
Seasonal mobility of antimony in sediment-water systems in algae- and macrophyte-dominated zones of Lake Taihu (China).太湖藻型和草型湖区沉积物-水系统中锑的季节性迁移。
Chemosphere. 2019 May;223:108-116. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
10
Evaluation of simulated dredging to control internal phosphorus release from sediments: Focused on phosphorus transfer and resupply across the sediment-water interface.评价疏浚作业控制沉积物内源磷释放的效果:关注磷在沉积物-水界面的迁移和补给。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Aug 15;592:662-673. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.219. Epub 2017 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatiotemporal evaluation of water quality, metal pollution, and human health risks in a dredged Urban River, New Jersey, USA.美国新泽西州一条疏浚城市河流的水质、金属污染及人类健康风险的时空评估
Environ Geochem Health. 2025 Jun 25;47(7):283. doi: 10.1007/s10653-025-02579-6.
2
Passive Sampling-Based versus Conventional-Based Metrics for Evaluating Remediation Efficacy at Contaminated Sediment Sites: A Review.基于被动采样与常规方法的指标在受污染沉积物场地修复效果评估中的比较:综述。
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Jul 18;57(28):10151-10172. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c00232. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
3
Simultaneous Kinetics of Selenite Oxidation and Sorption on δ-MnO in Stirred-Flow Reactors.
搅拌流反应器中硒酸盐氧化和吸附的同时动力学。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 12;18(6):2902. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062902.