Suppr超能文献

老年患者腹膜后肉瘤根治性切除术后的结局:来自美国肉瘤协作组的分析。

Outcomes of Elderly Patients Undergoing Curative Resection for Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Analysis From the US Sarcoma Collaborative.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2019 Jan;233:154-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.07.050. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The postoperative outcomes of elderly patients undergoing resection of retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) have not been widely studied.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgical resection for primary or recurrent RPS between 2000 and 2015 at participating US Sarcoma Collaborative institutions were identified. Patient demographics, perioperative morbidity, mortality, length of stay, discharge to home, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival were compared between elderly (≥70 y, n = 171) and nonelderly (<70 y, n = 494) patients.

RESULTS

There was no difference in perioperative morbidity (total and major complications elderly versus nonelderly: 39% versus 35%; P = 0.401 and 18% versus 17%; P = 0.646, respectively) or mortality between elderly and nonelderly patients with each group experiencing a 1% 30-d mortality rate. Length of stay and 30-d readmission rates were similar (elderly versus nonelderly; 7 d interquartile range [IQR: 5-9] versus 6 d [IQR: 4-9], P = 0.528 and 11% versus 12%, P = 0.667). Elderly patients were more likely to be discharged to a skilled nursing or rehabilitation facility (elderly versus nonelderly; 19% versus 7%, P < 0.001). There was no difference in 3-y disease-free survival between the elderly and nonelderly patients (41% versus 43%, P = 0.65); however, elderly patients had a lower 3-y disease-specific survival (60% versus 76%, P < 0.001). In elderly patients, the presence of multiple comorbidities and high-grade tumors were most predictive of outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced age was not associated with an increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality following resection of RPS in this multi-institutional review. Although short-term oncologic outcomes were similar in both groups, the risk of death after sarcoma recurrence was higher in elderly patients and may be related to comorbidity burden and tumor histology.

摘要

背景

老年患者行腹膜后肉瘤切除术(RPS)的术后结果尚未得到广泛研究。

方法

在参与美国肉瘤协作机构的机构中,确定了 2000 年至 2015 年间接受原发性或复发性 RPS 手术切除的患者。比较了老年(≥70 岁,n=171)和非老年(<70 岁,n=494)患者之间的患者人口统计学,围手术期发病率,死亡率,住院时间,出院回家,疾病特异性生存率和无病生存率。

结果

老年患者与非老年患者之间的围手术期发病率(总并发症和主要并发症:39%对 35%;P=0.401 和 18%对 17%;P=0.646)或死亡率无差异,每组患者的 30 天死亡率为 1%。住院时间和 30 天再入院率相似(老年与非老年:7 天 IQR[四分位距:5-9]对 6 天 IQR[4-9],P=0.528 和 11%对 12%,P=0.667)。老年患者更有可能出院到熟练的护理或康复机构(老年与非老年:19%对 7%,P<0.001)。老年患者和非老年患者的 3 年无病生存率无差异(41%对 43%,P=0.65);然而,老年患者的 3 年疾病特异性生存率较低(60%对 76%,P<0.001)。在老年患者中,存在多种合并症和高级别肿瘤是对结果的最主要预测因素。

结论

在这项多机构回顾性研究中,高龄与 RPS 切除术后围手术期发病率和死亡率增加无关。尽管两组的短期肿瘤学结果相似,但肉瘤复发后死亡的风险在老年患者中更高,这可能与合并症负担和肿瘤组织学有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验