• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

漏斗胸的非放射学严重程度测量。

Non-Radiographic Severity Measurement of Pectus Excavatum.

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Surgery/Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Children's Hospital Colorado, Colorado Springs, Colorado.

Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2019 Jan;233:376-380. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2018.08.017
PMID:30502274
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To avoid the radiation exposure of CT imaging and the expense of CT or MRI studies, we sought to develop a non-radiographic severity measurement of pectus excavatum based on 3D photogrammetric imaging.

METHODS

Over 28 mo, ten consecutive patient volunteers with pectus excavatum underwent 3D stereophotogrammetric imaging. The surface width to surface depth ratio (Surface Lengths Pectus Index), the chest deformity's surface area to total chest surface area (Pectus Surface Area Ratio), and the chest deformity's volume to total chest volume (Pectus Volume Ratio) were calculated. Simple linear regression analysis compared the Surface Lengths Pectus Index, Pectus Surface Area Ratio, and Pectus Volume Ratio calculations each to the corresponding known CT pectus index.

RESULTS

The correlation between CT pectus index versus Surface Lengths Pectus Index yielded an R-squared value of 0.7637 and a P value of 0.0013. A CT pectus index of 3.4 or greater (eight patients) corresponded to a Surface Lengths Pectus Index of 1.86 or greater (six patients). The CT pectus index versus Pectus Surface Area Ratio (R-squared = 0.4627, P = 0.0305) and the CT pectus index versus the Pectus Volume Ratio (R-squared = 0.3048, P = 0.0990) demonstrated less correlation.

CONCLUSION

Surface Lengths Pectus Index corresponds to the CT pectus index and may be adequate to determine severity of pectus excavatum in some patients.

摘要

背景

为了避免 CT 成像的辐射暴露和 CT 或 MRI 检查的费用,我们试图开发一种基于 3D 摄影测量成像的非放射性漏斗胸严重程度测量方法。

方法

在 28 个月的时间里,连续 10 名漏斗胸患者志愿者接受了 3D 立体摄影测量成像。计算了表面宽度与表面深度比(表面长度漏斗胸指数)、胸部畸形表面积与总胸部表面积比(漏斗胸表面积比)和胸部畸形体积与总胸部体积比(漏斗胸体积比)。简单线性回归分析比较了 Surface Lengths Pectus Index、Pectus Surface Area Ratio 和 Pectus Volume Ratio 计算值与相应的已知 CT 漏斗胸指数。

结果

CT 漏斗胸指数与 Surface Lengths Pectus Index 之间的相关性得出的 R 平方值为 0.7637,P 值为 0.0013。CT 漏斗胸指数为 3.4 或更高(8 名患者)对应于 Surface Lengths Pectus Index 为 1.86 或更高(6 名患者)。CT 漏斗胸指数与 Pectus Surface Area Ratio(R 平方值=0.4627,P=0.0305)和 CT 漏斗胸指数与 Pectus Volume Ratio(R 平方值=0.3048,P=0.0990)之间的相关性较小。

结论

Surface Lengths Pectus Index 与 CT 漏斗胸指数相对应,可能足以确定某些患者漏斗胸的严重程度。

相似文献

1
Non-Radiographic Severity Measurement of Pectus Excavatum.漏斗胸的非放射学严重程度测量。
J Surg Res. 2019 Jan;233:376-380. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
2
Comparison of Haller index values calculated with chest radiographs versus CT for pectus excavatum evaluation.比较采用胸部 X 光片和 CT 计算的 Haller 指数值在漏斗胸评估中的应用。
Pediatr Radiol. 2010 Nov;40(11):1763-7. doi: 10.1007/s00247-010-1681-z. Epub 2010 May 15.
3
Exaggerated Interventricular Dependence Among Patients With Pectus Excavatum: Combined Assessment With Cardiac MRI and Chest CT.漏斗胸患者中心室间依赖性增强:心脏MRI与胸部CT联合评估
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Apr;208(4):854-861. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17296. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
4
A novel technique to measure severity of pediatric pectus excavatum using white light scanning.一种使用白光扫描测量小儿漏斗胸严重程度的新技术。
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Apr;54(4):656-662. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
5
Development of Prediction Models for Cardiac Compression in Pectus Excavatum Based on Three-Dimensional Surface Images.基于三维表面图像的漏斗胸心脏压迫预测模型的开发
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Spring;35(1):202-212. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.11.006. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
6
Asymmetric Pectus Excavatum Is Associated with Overgrowth of Ribs Rather Than Cartilage.不对称漏斗胸与肋骨过度生长而非软骨过度生长有关。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Aug;63(5):427-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1395394. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
7
Hyperinflation of the left anterior basal segment: a new sign of pectus excavatum severity on CT.左前基底段肺过度充气:CT上漏斗胸严重程度的新征象。
Clin Radiol. 2017 Nov;72(11):991.e15-991.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.06.123. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
8
Measuring the impact of surgical intervention on pediatric pectus excavatum using white light scanning.使用白光扫描测量手术干预对小儿漏斗胸的影响。
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Nov;54(11):2261-2267. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
9
A Simplified Method for Three-Dimensional Optical Imaging and Measurement of Patients with Chest Wall Deformities.一种用于胸壁畸形患者的三维光学成像与测量的简化方法。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Feb;29(2):267-271. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0191. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
10
Three-Dimensional Optical Imaging for Pectus Excavatum Assessment.三维光学成像在漏斗胸评估中的应用。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Oct;108(4):1065-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.04.074. Epub 2019 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancements in preoperative imaging of pectus excavatum: a comprehensive review.漏斗胸术前影像学进展:全面综述
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jan 30;16(1):696-707. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-662. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
2
X-ray-free protocol for pectus deformities based on magnetic resonance imaging and a low-cost portable three-dimensional scanning device: a preliminary study.基于磁共振成像和低成本便携式三维扫描设备的无 X 射线鸡胸畸形检测方案:初步研究。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Jun 28;33(1):110-118. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab036.
3
The effectiveness of double-bar correction for pectus excavatum: A comparison between the parallel bar and cross-bar techniques.
双杠矫正漏斗胸的效果:平行杠与交叉杠技术的比较。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0238539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238539. eCollection 2020.
4
Optical imaging versus CT and plain radiography to quantify pectus severity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.光学成像与CT及X线平片用于量化漏斗胸严重程度的系统评价和Meta分析
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Apr;12(4):1475-1487. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.31.