Arrhythmia Center, Korea University Medical Center Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Arrhythmia Center, Korea University Medical Center Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Dec;15(12):1746-1753. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.09.012.
Electrical isolation of the left atrial appendage (LAA) is associated with a lower rate of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence in patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation. However, LAA isolation can significantly impair LAA contractility.
This study was performed to evaluate whether electrical isolation of the LAA is associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA).
Consecutive patients with AF undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation at Korea University Medical Center Anam Hospital were analyzed.
Of 2352 patients, 39 (1.7%) had LAA isolation. Patients with LAA isolation had a significantly higher rate of ischemic stroke or TIA than did those without LAA isolation (log-rank, P < .001; hazard ratio 23.6; P < .001). There were significant differences in the baseline characteristics of the 2 groups, including type of AF (34 [87.2%] and 911 [39.4%] patients with and without LAA isolation had nonparoxysmal AF, respectively). After multivariate adjustment, LAA isolation was found to be a significant risk factor for ischemic stroke or TIA (adjusted hazard ratio 11.3; P < .001). Propensity score-matched analysis also revealed an increased risk of ischemic stroke or TIA in patients with LAA isolation compared with those without LAA isolation (log-rank, P = .001). The LAA flow velocity of post-LAA isolation status was not significantly different between patients who did and did not experience ischemic stroke or TIA (30.3 ± 17.7 cm/s vs 33.9 ± 17.9 cm/s; P = .608).
A significantly increased risk of ischemic stroke or TIA was observed in patients with electrical isolation of the LAA. In addition, postisolation LAA flow velocity is not a reliable marker to predict future ischemic events.
左心耳(LAA)电隔离与射频导管消融患者心房颤动(AF)复发率降低相关。然而,LAA 隔离会显著损害 LAA 的收缩能力。
本研究旨在评估 LAA 电隔离是否与缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)风险增加相关。
分析韩国大学医疗中心安山医院连续接受射频导管消融的 AF 患者。
在 2352 例患者中,有 39 例(1.7%)进行了 LAA 隔离。LAA 隔离患者发生缺血性卒中和 TIA 的风险明显高于未行 LAA 隔离的患者(对数秩检验,P<0.001;风险比 23.6;P<0.001)。两组患者的基线特征存在显著差异,包括 AF 类型(34 例[87.2%]和 911 例[39.4%]患者分别为非阵发性 AF)。多变量调整后,LAA 隔离是缺血性卒中和 TIA 的显著危险因素(调整后的风险比 11.3;P<0.001)。倾向评分匹配分析也显示 LAA 隔离患者发生缺血性卒中和 TIA 的风险高于未行 LAA 隔离的患者(对数秩检验,P=0.001)。LAA 隔离后 LAA 流速在发生缺血性卒中和 TIA 的患者之间无显著差异(30.3±17.7 cm/s 比 33.9±17.9 cm/s;P=0.608)。
LAA 电隔离患者发生缺血性卒中和 TIA 的风险显著增加。此外,隔离后 LAA 流速不是预测未来缺血事件的可靠标志物。