Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚选择在家中由未经监管的分娩助手提供分娩护理的女性调查。

A survey of women in Australia who choose the care of unregulated birthworkers for a birth at home.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2752, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southern Queensland, 11 Salisbury Rd, Ipswich, QLD 4305, Australia.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.

出版信息

Women Birth. 2020 Feb;33(1):86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Nov 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anecdotally, the number of Australian women who choose unregulated birthworkers to support a homebirth without a registered midwife present is increasing.

AIM

To explore the experiences and reasons why some women choose unregulated birthworkers for a homebirth, and examine what they might do if changes in legislation removed this choice.

METHODS

A survey was distributed via social media networks and data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Content analysis was undertaken on open-ended questions.

FINDINGS

Eighty-two women completed the survey. Most reported they achieved an undisturbed homebirth with a flexible carer who provided continuity of care and respect for their choices irrespective of risk factors. Three women whose babies died described their homebirth with an unregulated birthworker as the worst experience of their life. Motivators for choosing an unregulated birthworker to support homebirth were: previous negative and traumatising birth experiences; limited choice; and lack of access to midwifery led models of care within mainstream services. Only a third of the women in this study said they would birth in a hospital if legislation prevented their access to an unregulated birthworker's support for a future birth.

CONCLUSION

Maternity services in Australia do not meet all women's needs, leaving some feeling no other option exists but to seek an unregulated birthworker to support a homebirth. Previous negative experiences with maternity healthcare providers, inflexible systems of care, and limited access to funding for homebirth with privately practising midwives were identified as motivating factors. These issues require solutions to prevent homebirth going underground.

摘要

背景

据传闻,选择不受监管的助产妇在没有注册助产士在场的情况下在家中分娩的澳大利亚女性人数正在增加。

目的

探讨一些女性选择不受监管的助产妇在家中分娩的经验和原因,并研究如果立法的变化取消了这种选择,她们可能会怎么做。

方法

通过社交媒体网络分发了一份调查,使用描述性统计方法对数据进行分析。对开放式问题进行了内容分析。

结果

82 名女性完成了调查。大多数人报告说,她们在家中实现了不受干扰的分娩,有一个灵活的护理人员提供连续的护理,并尊重她们的选择,无论风险因素如何。三名婴儿死亡的女性描述说,她们与不受监管的助产妇一起在家中分娩是她们一生中最糟糕的经历。选择不受监管的助产妇在家中分娩的动机是:之前的负面和创伤性分娩经历;选择有限;以及在主流服务中缺乏获得助产士主导的护理模式的机会。在这项研究中的三分之一的女性表示,如果立法禁止她们获得不受监管的助产妇的支持,她们将在医院分娩。

结论

澳大利亚的产妇服务没有满足所有女性的需求,这使得一些女性觉得别无选择,只能寻求不受监管的助产妇来支持在家分娩。与产妇保健提供者的负面经历、护理系统缺乏灵活性以及获得私人执业助产士支持的家庭分娩的资金有限,被确定为激励因素。这些问题需要解决方案,以防止家庭分娩转入地下。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验