Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Institute of Psychology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019 Jul;105:105-116. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.11.038. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
Since cortisol measurement in saliva has been established, it has been used as an indicator of stress-related hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis activity. Concurrent development of methodological frameworks such as ambulatory assessment, ecological momentary assessment, and experience sampling have provided opportunities to combine both approaches in daily life research. The current review provides a summary of basic methodological principles and recommendations, as well as abstracts of findings of studies investigating momentary associations between stress and cortisol in daily life with an emphasis on within-subject associations (i.e. average covariance in repeated momentary assessments of stress and cortisol, and individual-specific deviations from the average covariance). Methodological challenges related to stress measurement, sampling principles, and appropriate statistical modeling are discussed, followed by a description of the historical development of studies on within-subject associations between momentary daily life stress and cortisol. The review concludes with a discussion of controversial methodological characteristics of these studies regarding operationalizations of stress, compliance, timing and frequency of stress and cortisol sampling, and reporting of effect sizes. Future research in this area would benefit from automated cortisol assessment, broadening of the scope of stress response measures, use of advanced statistical models that better account for dynamics in the stress process in daily life, and attempts to replicate findings. While previous studies of momentary stress and concurrent cortisol assessments have reliably confirmed some fundamental predictions from stress theory in daily life, future studies should aim at providing progress by testing innovative research questions and utilizing new technological developments.
自从唾液中的皮质醇测量被建立以来,它一直被用作下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺皮质轴活动与应激相关的指标。同时发展起来的方法学框架,如动态评估、生态瞬时评估和体验抽样,为在日常生活研究中结合这两种方法提供了机会。本综述提供了基本方法学原则和建议的摘要,以及在日常生活中研究应激和皮质醇瞬时关联的研究结果的摘要,重点是个体内关联(即应激和皮质醇的重复瞬时评估中的平均协方差,以及个体特有的平均协方差偏差)。讨论了与应激测量、采样原则和适当的统计建模相关的方法学挑战,然后描述了关于瞬时日常生活应激和皮质醇之间个体内关联的研究的历史发展。综述最后讨论了这些研究在应激的操作化、应激和皮质醇采样的顺应性、时间和频率以及效应大小报告方面的有争议的方法学特征。该领域的未来研究将受益于皮质醇的自动评估、应激反应测量范围的扩大、使用更好地解释日常生活中应激过程动态的先进统计模型,以及对发现的复制。虽然瞬时应激和同时皮质醇评估的先前研究已经可靠地证实了日常生活中应激理论的一些基本预测,但未来的研究应该通过测试创新的研究问题和利用新技术发展来提供进展。