Laboratoire de Physique Statistique, École Normale Supérieure, PSL University, Université Paris Diderot, Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, 75005 Paris, France and
Laboratoire de Physique Statistique, École Normale Supérieure, PSL University, Université Paris Diderot, Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, 75005 Paris, France and.
J Neurosci. 2019 Jan 30;39(5):833-853. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1015-18.2018. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
Perceptual decision-making is the subject of many experimental and theoretical studies. Most modeling analyses are based on statistical processes of accumulation of evidence. In contrast, very few works confront attractor network models' predictions with empirical data from continuous sequences of trials. Recently however, numerical simulations of a biophysical competitive attractor network model have shown that such a network can describe sequences of decision trials and reproduce repetition biases observed in perceptual decision experiments. Here we get more insights into such effects by considering an extension of the reduced attractor network model of Wong and Wang (2006), taking into account an inhibitory current delivered to the network once a decision has been made. We make explicit the conditions on this inhibitory input for which the network can perform a succession of trials, without being either trapped in the first reached attractor, or losing all memory of the past dynamics. We study in detail how, during a sequence of decision trials, reaction times and performance depend on nonlinear dynamics of the network, and we confront the model behavior with empirical findings on sequential effects. Here we show that, quite remarkably, the network exhibits, qualitatively and with the correct order of magnitude, post-error slowing and post-error improvement in accuracy, two subtle effects reported in behavioral experiments in the absence of any feedback about the correctness of the decision. Our work thus provides evidence that such effects result from intrinsic properties of the nonlinear neural dynamics. Much experimental and theoretical work is being devoted to the understanding of the neural correlates of perceptual decision-making. In a typical behavioral experiment, animals or humans perform a continuous series of binary discrimination tasks. To model such experiments, we consider a biophysical decision-making attractor neural network, taking into account an inhibitory current delivered to the network once a decision is made. Here we provide evidence that the same intrinsic properties of the nonlinear network dynamics underpins various sequential effects reported in experiments. Quite remarkably, in the absence of feedback on the correctness of the decisions, the network exhibits post-error slowing (longer reaction times after error trials) and post-error improvement in accuracy (smaller error rates after error trials).
知觉决策是许多实验和理论研究的主题。大多数建模分析都基于证据积累的统计过程。相比之下,很少有工作将吸引子网络模型的预测与来自连续试验序列的经验数据进行对比。然而,最近,对生物物理竞争吸引子网络模型的数值模拟表明,这样的网络可以描述决策试验序列,并再现知觉决策实验中观察到的重复偏差。在这里,我们通过考虑 Wong 和 Wang(2006)的简化吸引子网络模型的扩展,进一步深入了解这种效应,该模型考虑了一旦做出决策就向网络提供的抑制电流。我们明确了网络可以连续进行试验的条件,而不会被困在第一个到达的吸引子中,也不会失去对过去动力学的所有记忆。我们详细研究了在决策试验序列中,反应时间和性能如何取决于网络的非线性动力学,并且我们将模型行为与关于序列效应的经验发现进行了对比。在这里,我们惊人地发现,网络表现出明显的、具有正确数量级的后错误减速和后错误准确性提高,这是在没有任何关于决策正确性的反馈的情况下在行为实验中报告的两个微妙效应。我们的工作因此提供了证据,表明这些效应源自非线性神经动力学的内在特性。大量的实验和理论工作致力于理解知觉决策的神经相关性。在典型的行为实验中,动物或人类连续执行一系列二元判别任务。为了模拟这样的实验,我们考虑了一个生物物理决策吸引子神经网络,该网络考虑了一旦做出决策就向网络提供的抑制电流。在这里,我们提供了证据,表明非线性网络动力学的相同内在特性支持了实验中报告的各种序列效应。非常显著的是,在没有关于决策正确性的反馈的情况下,网络表现出后错误减速(错误试验后反应时间更长)和后错误准确性提高(错误试验后错误率更小)。