Yan G E, Efferth Thomas
Department of Pharmaceutical Biology, Institute of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Department of Pharmaceutical Biology, Institute of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
Anticancer Res. 2018 Dec;38(12):6669-6672. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13034.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) dual staining is commonly applied in bioscience as a method to detect apoptosis. However, excessive handling of adherent cells may interfere with the integrity of plasma membrane and hence impede the accuracy of this method. Here, we exploited PI uptake as an indicator of cell integrity and investigated how cell harvesting methods and solutions involved in common apoptosis detection techniques affected measurement results.
Different cell harvesting techniques, staining with PI and flow cytometry were performed.
Non-fixed scrapped cells revealed significantly higher fractions of PI-positive staining compared to non-fixed trypsinized cells. In the case of harvesting cells by scrapping, samples stained in binding buffer (68.30±3.55%) showed consistently higher PI-positive staining than samples stained in PBS (36.37±5.90%) in a significant manner (p=0.015).
Enzymatic harvesting using 0.25% trypsin instead of mechanical harvesting by rubber scraper caused less damage of cell integrity. Furthermore, the binding buffer used in the apoptosis detection protocol aggravated the existing plasma membrane damage caused by the rubber scraper.
背景/目的:膜联蛋白V和碘化丙啶(PI)双重染色作为检测细胞凋亡的一种方法,在生物科学中被广泛应用。然而,对贴壁细胞的过度处理可能会干扰质膜的完整性,从而影响该方法的准确性。在此,我们将PI摄取作为细胞完整性的指标,研究了常见凋亡检测技术中涉及的细胞收获方法和溶液如何影响测量结果。
采用不同的细胞收获技术、PI染色和流式细胞术。
与未固定的胰蛋白酶消化细胞相比,未固定的刮取细胞显示出显著更高比例的PI阳性染色。在通过刮取收获细胞的情况下,在结合缓冲液中染色的样本(68.30±3.55%)始终比在PBS中染色的样本(36.37±5.90%)显示出更高的PI阳性染色,差异具有统计学意义(p=0.015)。
使用0.25%胰蛋白酶进行酶解收获而非用橡胶刮棒进行机械收获对细胞完整性的损伤较小。此外,凋亡检测方案中使用的结合缓冲液加剧了橡胶刮棒对质膜造成的现有损伤。