Suppr超能文献

不同滴度性病研究实验室试验中血凝试验的评估

Evaluation of Hemagglutination Assay among Varying Titers of the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory Test.

作者信息

Kashyap Bineeta, Goyal Nisha, Gupta Neha, Singh N P, Kumar Vinod

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Indian J Dermatol. 2018 Nov-Dec;63(6):479-483. doi: 10.4103/ijd.IJD_595_17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Syphilis, besides being a significant cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality, is a substantial cause of adult morbidity. A discordant serological result can present a diagnostic challenge; hence, a fundamental knowledge about the diagnostic limitations or interpretation of these assays becomes imperative for the clinicians to avoid management dilemma. The study was proposed to see the usefulness and correlation of hemagglutination assay (TPHA) with varying titers of Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over a period of 2 years, 22,351 sera were subjected to screening for syphilis by VDRL test. TPHA test was performed for confirmation in 243 of the total sera.

RESULTS

VDRL reactivity was seen in 0.77% of the tested sera. TPHA positivity was 58.85% among the sera tested. Calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of VDRL against TPHA were 87.41%, 52%, 72.25%, and 74.29%, respectively. TPHA positivity was found to be 100% and 55% in VDRL reactive cases with titers ≥32 and <8, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Screening and diagnostic serological tests for syphilis should be reviewed in routine by the treating physician in the light of clinical presentation and the history of infection and treatment.

摘要

背景与目的

梅毒不仅是围产期发病和死亡的重要原因,也是成人发病的重要原因。血清学结果不一致会带来诊断挑战;因此,临床医生必须掌握这些检测方法的诊断局限性或解读的基本知识,以避免管理困境。本研究旨在观察血凝试验(TPHA)与不同滴度的性病研究实验室(VDRL)试验的实用性及相关性。

材料与方法

在2年时间里,对22351份血清进行了VDRL试验梅毒筛查。对其中243份血清进行了TPHA试验以作确认。

结果

在所检测的血清中,0.77%出现VDRL反应性。在所检测的血清中,TPHA阳性率为58.85%。VDRL相对于TPHA的计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为87.41%、52%、72.25%和74.29%。在VDRL反应性病例中,滴度≥32和<8时,TPHA阳性率分别为100%和55%。

结论

治疗医生应根据临床表现以及感染和治疗史,定期对梅毒的筛查和诊断血清学检测进行评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5de/6233038/da82139c54f0/IJD-63-479-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验