Suppr超能文献

利用数字胸腔引流装置的经胸膜气流数据预测肺手术后肺漏气持续时间。

Forecasting pulmonary air leak duration following lung surgery using transpleural airflow data from a digital pleural drainage device.

作者信息

Yeung Ching, Ghazel Mohsen, French Daniel, Japkowicz Nathalie, Gottlieb Bram, Maziak Donna, Seely Andrew J E, Shamji Farid, Sundaresan Sudhir, Villeneuve Patrick James, Gilbert Sebastien

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2018 Nov;10(Suppl 32):S3747-S3754. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.08.11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prolonged air leak (PAL) is often the limiting factor for hospital discharge after lung surgery. Our goal was to develop a statistical model that reliably predicts pulmonary air leak resolution by applying statistical time series modeling and forecasting techniques to digital drainage data.

METHODS

Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) modeling was used to forecast air leak flow from transplural air flow data. The results from ARIMA were retrospectively internally validated with a group of 100 patients who underwent lung resection between December 2012 and March 2017, for whom digital pleural drainage data was available for analysis and a persistent air leak was the limiting factor for chest tube removal.

RESULTS

The ARIMA model correctly identified 82% (82/100) of patients as to whether or not the last chest tube removal was appropriate. The performance characteristics of the model in properly identifying patients whose air leak would resolve and who would therefore be candidates for safe chest tube removal were: sensitivity 80% (95% CI, 69-88%), specificity 88% (95% CI, 68-97%), positive predictive value 95% (95% CI, 86-99%), and negative predictive value 59% (95% CI, 42-79%). The false positive and false negative rate was 12% (95% CI, 12-31%) and 20% (95% CI, 12-31%).

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to validate a statistical model that that reliably predicted resolution of pulmonary air leak resolution over a 24-hour period. This information may improve the care of patients with chest tube by optimizing duration of pleural drainage.

摘要

背景

长时间漏气(PAL)通常是肺手术后出院的限制因素。我们的目标是通过将统计时间序列建模和预测技术应用于数字引流数据,开发一种能够可靠预测肺漏气解决情况的统计模型。

方法

使用自回归积分移动平均(ARIMA)模型从经胸壁气流数据预测漏气流量。ARIMA模型的结果在一组100例于2012年12月至2017年3月期间接受肺切除术的患者中进行回顾性内部验证,这些患者有可用的数字胸腔引流数据用于分析,且持续性漏气是拔除胸管的限制因素。

结果

ARIMA模型正确识别了82%(82/100)的患者最后一次胸管拔除是否合适。该模型在正确识别漏气会解决从而适合安全拔除胸管的患者方面的性能特征为:敏感性80%(95%CI,69 - 88%),特异性88%(95%CI,68 - 97%),阳性预测值95%(95%CI,86 - 99%),阴性预测值59%(95%CI,42 - 79%)。假阳性率和假阴性率分别为12%(95%CI,12 - 31%)和20%(95%CI,12 - 31%)。

结论

我们能够验证一种统计模型,该模型能够可靠地预测24小时内肺漏气的解决情况。这些信息可能通过优化胸腔引流持续时间来改善胸管患者的护理。

相似文献

2
Determining optimal air leak resolution criteria when using digital pleural drainage device after lung resection.
JTCVS Open. 2024 Feb 5;18:360-368. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.01.016. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Randomized trial of digital versus analog pleural drainage in patients with or without a pulmonary air leak after lung resection.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Nov;150(5):1243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.051. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
5
Chest tube removal at different gas flows in prolonged air leak: a randomized non-inferiority trial.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Mar 1;65(3). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae097.
7
[Application of Digital Drainage System in Postoperative Refractory Prolonged Air Leaks after Pulmonary Surgery].
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 20;20(12):833-836. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2017.12.07.
9
Early Identification of Patients Who Will Meet 24-Hour Fluid Output Threshold for Chest Tube Removal After Lung Resection.
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;31(4):861-867. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2019.02.023. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
10
A Systematic Review of Digital vs Analog Drainage for Air Leak After Surgical Resection or Spontaneous Pneumothorax.
Chest. 2020 May;157(5):1346-1353. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.11.046. Epub 2020 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Determining optimal air leak resolution criteria when using digital pleural drainage device after lung resection.
JTCVS Open. 2024 Feb 5;18:360-368. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.01.016. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Management of Complications After Lung Resection: Prolonged Air Leak and Bronchopleural Fistula.
Thorac Surg Clin. 2020 Aug;30(3):347-358. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2020.04.008. Epub 2020 Apr 17.

本文引用的文献

3
A clinical prediction model for prolonged air leak after pulmonary resection.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Mar;153(3):690-699.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
4
Identifying Patients at Higher Risk of Prolonged Air Leak After Lung Resection.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Nov;102(5):1674-1679. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.035. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
5
Advances in chest drain management in thoracic disease.
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Feb;8(Suppl 1):S55-64. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.11.19.
6
Air leak after lung resection: pathophysiology and patients' implications.
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Feb;8(Suppl 1):S46-54. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.11.08.
7
Randomized trial of digital versus analog pleural drainage in patients with or without a pulmonary air leak after lung resection.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Nov;150(5):1243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.051. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
9
Multicenter international randomized comparison of objective and subjective outcomes between electronic and traditional chest drainage systems.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Aug;98(2):490-6; discussion 496-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.03.043. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验