Division of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Mar;153(3):690-699.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
Prolonged air leak increases costs and worsens outcomes after pulmonary resection. We aimed to develop a clinical prediction tool for prolonged air leak using pretreatment and intraoperative variables.
Patients who underwent pulmonary resection for lung cancer/nodules (from January 2009 to June 2014) were stratified by prolonged parenchymal air leak (>5 days). Using backward stepwise logistic regression with bootstrap resampling for internal validation, candidate variables were identified and a nomogram risk calculator was developed.
A total of 2317 patients underwent pulmonary resection for lung cancer/nodules. Prolonged air leak (8.6%, n = 200) was associated with significantly longer hospital stay (median 10 vs 4 days; P < .001). Final model variables associated with increased risk included low percent forced expiratory volume in 1 second, smoking history, bilobectomy, higher annual surgeon caseload, previous chest surgery, Zubrod score >2, and interaction terms for right-sided thoracotomy and wedge resection by thoracotomy. Wedge resection, higher body mass index, and unmeasured percent forced expiratory volume in 1 second were protective. Derived nomogram discriminatory accuracy was 76% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.79) and facilitated patient stratification into low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups with monotonic increase in observed prolonged air leaks (2.0%, 8.9%, and 19.2%, respectively; P < .001). Patients at intermediate and high risk were 4.80 times (95% CI, 2.86-8.07) and 11.86 times (95% CI, 7.21-19.52) more likely to have prolonged air leak compared with patients at low risk.
Using readily available candidate variables, our nomogram predicts increasing risk of prolonged air leak with good discriminatory ability. Risk stratification can support surgical decision making, and help initiate proactive, patient-specific surgical management.
肺切除术后,长时间的漏气会增加成本并导致预后变差。我们旨在利用术前和术中变量开发一种用于长时间漏气的临床预测工具。
根据肺实质漏气(>5 天)将 2009 年 1 月至 2014 年 6 月期间接受肺癌/结节肺切除术的患者分层。使用带 bootstrap 重采样的向后逐步逻辑回归进行内部验证,确定候选变量,并开发列线图风险计算器。
共 2317 例肺癌/结节患者接受了肺切除术。长时间的漏气(8.6%,n=200)与住院时间明显延长(中位数分别为 10 天和 4 天;P<0.001)相关。与风险增加相关的最终模型变量包括低 1 秒用力呼气量百分比、吸烟史、双叶切除术、较高的年度外科医生手术量、既往胸部手术史、Zubrod 评分>2,以及右侧开胸和楔形切除术的开胸交互项。楔形切除术、较高的体重指数和未测量的 1 秒用力呼气量百分比是保护性的。衍生的列线图区分准确性为 76%(95%置信区间[CI],0.72-0.79),并通过观察到的长时间漏气呈单调增加,方便地将患者分层为低、中、高危组(分别为 2.0%、8.9%和 19.2%;P<0.001)。与低危患者相比,中危和高危患者发生长时间漏气的可能性分别高出 4.80 倍(95%CI,2.86-8.07)和 11.86 倍(95%CI,7.21-19.52)。
使用现成的候选变量,我们的列线图预测长时间漏气的风险具有良好的区分能力。风险分层可以支持手术决策,并有助于启动针对患者的积极主动的手术管理。