Suppr超能文献

环介导等温扩增技术结合层析流层析检测棒法的改进与评价及其在霍乱弧菌检测中的应用。

Improvement and evaluation of loop-mediated isothermal amplification combined with a chromatographic flow dipstick assay and utilization in detection of Vibrio cholerae.

机构信息

College of Life Sciences, Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266071, Shandong, China.

School of Medicine, Nankai University, No. 94 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300071, China.

出版信息

Anal Bioanal Chem. 2019 Jan;411(3):647-658. doi: 10.1007/s00216-018-1472-1. Epub 2018 Dec 1.

Abstract

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is a specific, sensitive, and easy-to-perform nucleic acid analytical technique with wide application for diagnosis of disease. Recently, LAMP combined with use of a lateral chromatographic flow dipstick (LFD) has been widely used in nucleic acid detection. However, the LFD mechanism has not been systematically analyzed, and the optimal combination of labeled primers has not been adequately evaluated. We analyzed the LAMP mechanism and discovered that the labeled loop primers played a significant role in the LFD assay. To verify our hypothesis, we developed two LFD assays for Vibrio cholerae to detect the ctxA gene and the 16S-23S ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS). We labeled the inner primers [forward inner primer (FIP) and backward inner primer (BIP)] and loop primers [forward loop primer (LF) and backward loop primer (LB)]. Then the labeled and unlabeled primers were combined to form ten different primer sets. We assessed the specificity, sensitivity, and efficiency of LFD assays with use of different primer compositions. All triple-labeled primer sets resulted in false positive results in the LFD assay, as did the FIP and BIP double-labeled primer set. Other double-labeled-primer sets used in LFD assays showed higher sensitivity than the LAMP assays. Moreover, FIP and LF double-labeled and BIP and LB double-labeled sets had the highest sensitivity. In both cases, assays could be performed in 20 min. We also applied the ITS LFD assays in food samples. The enrichment broths of 112 oyster samples were tested, and the proportion that tested positive by the LFD assays was 6.25%, which was not lower than the rate for the conventional PCR method (5.36%). Graphical abstract ᅟ.

摘要

环介导等温扩增(LAMP)是一种特异性强、灵敏度高、操作简便的核酸分析技术,在疾病诊断中应用广泛。最近,LAMP 与侧向层析流纸条(LFD)的结合已广泛应用于核酸检测。然而,LFD 的机制尚未得到系统分析,标记引物的最佳组合也没有得到充分评估。我们分析了 LAMP 的机制,发现标记的环引物在 LFD 检测中起着重要作用。为了验证我们的假设,我们开发了两种用于检测霍乱弧菌 ctxA 基因和 16S-23S 核糖体 DNA 内部转录间隔区(ITS)的 LFD 检测方法。我们标记了内引物[正向内引物(FIP)和反向内引物(BIP)]和环引物[正向环引物(LF)和反向环引物(LB)]。然后,用不同的引物组合形成了十种不同的引物组合。我们评估了不同引物组成的 LFD 检测方法的特异性、灵敏度和效率。所有三标记引物组合在 LFD 检测中均产生假阳性结果,FIP 和 BIP 双标记引物组合也是如此。其他用于 LFD 检测的双标记引物组合比 LAMP 检测更灵敏。此外,FIP 和 LF 双标记以及 BIP 和 LB 双标记组具有最高的灵敏度。在这两种情况下,检测均可在 20 分钟内完成。我们还将 ITS LFD 检测方法应用于食品样品。检测了 112 个牡蛎样本的富集肉汤,LFD 检测方法的阳性检出率为 6.25%,与传统 PCR 方法(5.36%)的检出率相当。图摘要 ᅟ.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验