Department of Pharmacy, Banner University Medical Center Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona.
Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy - Glendale, Midwestern University, Glendale, Arizona.
Pharmacotherapy. 2019 Mar;39(3):382-398. doi: 10.1002/phar.2199. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
Shock syndromes are associated with unacceptably high rates of mortality in critically ill patients despite advances in therapeutic options. Vasodilatory shock is the most common type encountered in the intensive care unit. It is manifested by cardiovascular failure, peripheral vasodilatation, and arterial hypotension leading to tissue hypoperfusion and organ failure. Hemodynamic support is typically initiated with fluid resuscitation strategies and administration of adrenergic vasopressor agents in nonresponsive patients to restore arterial pressure with subsequent adequate organ reperfusion. Unfortunately, high catecholamine dosing requirements may be necessary to achieve targeted hemodynamic goals that may increase the risk of vasopressor-induced adverse events. The purpose of this article is to review the clinical efficacy and safety data and potential role in therapy for catecholamine-sparing agents in vasodilatory shock. Adjunctive therapeutic options to reduce vasoactive support requirements without compromising arterial pressure include arginine vasopressin and analogs, corticosteroids, midodrine, methylene blue, and angiotensin II. Although concomitant vasopressin and corticosteroids have a more defined role in evidence-based guidelines for managing shock, clinicians may consider other potential catecholamine-sparing agents.
休克综合征尽管治疗选择有所进步,但与危重患者不可接受的高死亡率相关。血管扩张性休克是在重症监护病房中最常见的类型。其表现为心血管衰竭、外周血管扩张和动脉低血压,导致组织灌注不足和器官衰竭。通常通过液体复苏策略和对无反应患者给予肾上腺素能血管加压剂来启动血流动力学支持,以恢复动脉压,随后进行适当的器官再灌注。不幸的是,可能需要高剂量儿茶酚胺来实现目标血流动力学目标,这可能会增加血管加压素诱导的不良事件的风险。本文旨在回顾血管扩张性休克中儿茶酚胺节约剂的临床疗效和安全性数据及其在治疗中的潜在作用。在不影响动脉压的情况下减少血管活性支持需求的辅助治疗选择包括血管加压素和类似物、皮质类固醇、米多君、亚甲蓝和血管紧张素 II。尽管血管加压素和皮质类固醇在管理休克的循证指南中有更明确的作用,但临床医生可能会考虑其他潜在的儿茶酚胺节约剂。