Suppr超能文献

前交叉韧带重建前后的等速膝关节力量和本体感觉:家庭康复与监督康复的比较

Isokinetic knee strength and proprioception before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A comparison between home-based and supervised rehabilitation.

作者信息

Lim Jong-Min, Cho Jae-Jin, Kim Tae-Yeong, Yoon Bum-Chul

机构信息

Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Yeoju Institute of Technology, Yeoju-si, Kyunggi-do, Korea.

Department of Physical Therapy, Sahmyook University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32(3):421-429. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181237.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction focuses on restoring knee deficiencies and function. However, the extent of the clinician's direct supervision that is required to recover knee function is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate differences in isokinetic knee strength improvement, endurance, and proprioception between home-based (HBR) and supervised rehabilitation (SR).

METHODS

Thirty participants were randomly allocated to each group after reconstruction. Isokinetic knee strength and proprioception were measured using the Biodex multi-joint and stability systems, respectively, before and after intervention.

RESULTS

The SR group showed a significant improvement from baseline, but not the HBR group (SR group, from 1.94 ± 1.44 to 1.02 ± 0.92, p< 0.05; HBR group, from 1.69 ± 0.88 to 1.61 ± 0.90, p> 0.05). There was a significant effect of exercise type on proprioception scores after controlling for pretest values (p< 0.05). No significant difference in isokinetic knee strength was observed between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

HBR recovered knee strength as effectively as the SR, but SR was more effective than HBR for the recovery of proprioception and functional knee movement. This result indicates that guidance from health professionals play an important role in enhancing proprioception for patients following ACL reconstruction.

摘要

背景

前交叉韧带(ACL)重建后的康复重点在于恢复膝关节功能和弥补膝关节缺陷。然而,恢复膝关节功能所需临床医生直接监督的程度尚不清楚。

目的

研究家庭康复(HBR)和监督下康复(SR)在等速膝关节力量改善、耐力和本体感觉方面的差异。

方法

30名参与者在重建后被随机分配到每组。分别在干预前后使用Biodex多关节和稳定性系统测量等速膝关节力量和本体感觉。

结果

SR组与基线相比有显著改善,而HBR组没有(SR组,从1.94±1.44到1.02±0.92,p<0.05;HBR组,从1.69±0.88到1.61±0.90,p>0.05)。在控制预测试值后,运动类型对本体感觉评分有显著影响(p<0.05)。两组之间在等速膝关节力量方面未观察到显著差异。

结论

HBR在恢复膝关节力量方面与SR同样有效,但在恢复本体感觉和膝关节功能运动方面,SR比HBR更有效。这一结果表明,健康专业人员的指导对ACL重建术后患者增强本体感觉起着重要作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验