Division of Endocrinology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2019 Feb;26(1):49-53. doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000460.
Genitoplasty in children with disorders of sex development (DSD) is an ethically complex issue. From a surgical perspective, genitoplasty in early childhood is preferred because it is felt to be associated with improved tissue healing, decreased risk of complications, and reduced psychological impact of genital surgery. However, advocacy groups and recent ethics literature have argued for deferring genitoplasty until a child reaches decisional maturity. This article reviews these arguments using an ethical framework and discusses the application and challenges of recent disorders of sex development research.
Recent ethics literature and advocacy groups have argued for deferring genitoplasty until a child reaches decisional maturity. As a counterpoint, urological societies have published arguments supporting the practice of early genitoplasty. Data from DSD research lends some guidance but also has a wide range of outcomes, which makes generalizability difficult. A retrospective, multicenter study of 21 individuals with congenital adrenal hyperplasia who underwent feminizing surgery showed no difference between cases and controls in social functioning, parent-child relationships, or sexual fulfillment. Ninety percent of patients thought genitoplasty should occur within the first year of life. In a study of 52 patients with 46,XY and 46,XX DSDs who underwent masculinizing genitoplasty, 57% thought their physical appearance was 'fair' or 'poor,' and problems with sexual function, urinary incontinence, and short penile length were common.
Early genitoplasty in children with DSDs is ethically complex, and discordant results in DSD research makes generalizability difficult. There is unlikely to be a universal solution to the issue of early genitoplasty in children with DSDs; families must be supported while they weigh both parental decision-making and the objective of ensuring an open future for their child.
儿童性别发育障碍(DSD)患者的生殖器整形术是一个具有伦理复杂性的问题。从手术的角度来看,幼儿期进行生殖器整形术是首选,因为人们认为它与改善组织愈合、降低并发症风险以及减少生殖器手术的心理影响有关。然而,倡导团体和最近的伦理学文献认为应推迟到儿童达到决策成熟时再进行生殖器整形术。本文使用伦理框架来回顾这些论点,并讨论最近 DSD 研究的应用和挑战。
最近的伦理学文献和倡导团体主张将生殖器整形术推迟到儿童达到决策成熟时进行。作为反驳,泌尿科协会发表了支持早期生殖器整形术的论点。来自 DSD 研究的数据提供了一些指导,但也存在广泛的结果,这使得推广变得困难。对 21 名接受女性化手术的先天性肾上腺增生患者进行的回顾性、多中心研究表明,在社会功能、亲子关系或性满足方面,病例与对照组之间没有差异。90%的患者认为生殖器整形术应在生命的第一年进行。在一项对 52 名 46,XY 和 46,XX DSD 患者进行男性化生殖器整形术的研究中,57%的患者认为自己的外貌“一般”或“差”,性功能、尿失禁和阴茎短小等问题很常见。
儿童 DSD 患者的早期生殖器整形术具有伦理复杂性,而且 DSD 研究中的不一致结果使得推广变得困难。对于儿童 DSD 患者早期生殖器整形术的问题,不太可能有一个普遍适用的解决方案;必须在家庭权衡父母决策和为孩子提供开放未来的目标的同时为他们提供支持。