Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Mar;27(3):468-475. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
To investigate the construct validity of the new thumb base OA magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scoring system (TOMS) by comparing TOMS scores with radiographic scores in patients with primary hand OA.
In 200 patients (83.5% women, mean (SD) age 61.0 (8.4) years), postero-anterior radiographs and MR scans (1.5 T) of the right first carpometacarpal (CMC-1) and scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) joints, were scored using the OARSI atlas and TOMS, respectively. The distributions of the TOMS scores (specified in results section) were stratified for the OARSI scores of corresponding radiographic features and investigated using boxplots and non-parametric tests. Furthermore, Spearman's rank or Phi correlation coefficients (ρ/φ) were calculated.
For all features, especially for erosions and osteophytes, the prevalence found with MRI was higher than with radiography. TOMS osteophyte and cartilage loss scores differed statistically significant between corresponding OARSI scores in CMC-1 (0 vs 1; 1 vs 2). TOMS scores were positively correlated with radiographic scores in CMC-1 for osteophytes (coefficient [95% confidence interval], ρ = 0.75 [0.69; 0.81]), cartilage loss/joint space narrowing (ρ = 0.70 [0.62; 0.76]), subchondral bone defects (SBDs)/erosion-cyst (ρ = 0.41 [0.29; 0.52]), bone marrow lesions (BMLs)/subchondral sclerosis (ρ = 0.65 [0.56; 0.73]) and subluxation (φ = 0.65 [0.57; 0.73]); and in STT for osteophytes (ρ = 0.30 [0.17; 0.42]) and cartilage loss/joint space narrowing (ρ = 0.53 [0.42; 0.62]).
In patients with hand OA, TOMS scores positively correlated with radiographic scores, indicating good construct validity. However, the prevalence of features on MR images was higher compared to radiographs, suggesting that TOMS might be more sensitive than radiography. The clinical meaning of these extra MR detected cases is currently still unknown.
通过比较原发性手部骨关节炎(OA)患者的新拇指基底 OA 磁共振成像(MRI)评分系统(TOMS)评分与放射学评分,探讨 TOMS 评分的结构效度。
在 200 名患者(83.5%为女性,平均(标准差)年龄 61.0(8.4)岁)中,使用 OARSI 图谱和 TOMS 分别对右第一腕掌(CMC-1)和舟状骨-大多角骨(STT)关节的后前位 X 线片和 MRI 进行评分。TOMS 评分(在结果部分指定)按相应放射学特征的 OARSI 评分分层,并使用箱线图和非参数检验进行研究。此外,还计算了 Spearman 秩相关或φ相关系数(ρ/φ)。
对于所有特征,尤其是侵蚀和骨赘,MRI 发现的患病率高于 X 线摄影。在 CMC-1 中,TOMS 骨赘和软骨丢失评分在对应 OARSI 评分 0 与 1(1 与 2)之间存在统计学显著差异。TOMS 评分与 CMC-1 的放射学评分呈正相关,包括骨赘(系数[95%置信区间],ρ=0.75[0.69;0.81])、软骨丢失/关节间隙狭窄(ρ=0.70[0.62;0.76])、软骨下骨缺损/侵蚀性囊肿(ρ=0.41[0.29;0.52])、骨髓病变/软骨下硬化(ρ=0.65[0.56;0.73])和半脱位(φ=0.65[0.57;0.73]);在 STT 中,骨赘(ρ=0.30[0.17;0.42])和软骨丢失/关节间隙狭窄(ρ=0.53[0.42;0.62])。
在手部 OA 患者中,TOMS 评分与放射学评分呈正相关,表明具有良好的结构效度。然而,与 X 射线摄影相比,MRI 图像上特征的患病率更高,这表明 TOMS 可能比 X 射线摄影更敏感。目前尚不清楚这些额外的 MRI 检测病例的临床意义。